Zone1 The Great Feminization-by Helen Andrews

[Zincwarrior]

Women are currently part of the American voting block who VOTE for policies that can include going to war. Think, instead of regurgitating feminist talking points.

So no female President. Trump ran on being for peace.

 

[Leo123]

So no female President. Trump ran on being for peace.

No female real combat soldiers. It takes men willing to go to war to create and make peace.

 

[martybegan]

Women can never be good combat soldiers. Men are the ones that have to do that. Sure, they can drive, fly work in supply etc. but, when it comes down to taking down a machine gun nest, taking a hill, slogging through jungles or crawling out of a fox hole, etc. they would only be a burden. However, they vote to put men in those circumstances. Men always die by the thousands in wars. Women combat prisoners would likely be tortured and raped or raped and sent back pregnant to humiliate and tear down the other side.

In addition to all that, politics can be very divisive in a family and is the cause of friction and divorce in many cases. Better to have the husband represent the family.

It's not a perfect situation, and some roles should be for men (or very butch women) based on physical ability, but a free society demands sacrifice from all parts of it in times of need and war.

That's something we have forgotten about in general.

 

[martybegan]

deciding things based on emotions is just as valid as deciding on logical arguments, but to arrive at any real solution, both sides of the coin should be studied in detail.

Using emotion doesn't get you the results logic would get you.

It is not "just as valid" when it comes to certain things. You don't want someone feeling their calcs on bridge construction are correct, you want them knowing the calcs are correct.

 

[Leo123]

It's not a perfect situation, and some roles should be for men (or very butch women) based on physical ability, but a free society demands sacrifice from all parts of it in times of need and war.

That's something we have forgotten about in general.

Even 'butch' women don't stand a chance in real combat. They are just not as strong as men in general. Today we do have women in the military doing just what you said, playing supporting roles, but they will never be subject to the same rigors as men in combat and would be a drag in a real fighting, combat situation. So, my original question: Why are they allowed to vote to send men to war?

 

[martybegan]

Even 'butch' women don't stand a chance in real combat. They are just not as strong as men in general. Today we do have women in the military doing just what you said, playing supporting roles, but they will never be subject to the same rigors as men in combat and would be a drag in a real fighting, combat situation. So, my original question: Why are they allowed to vote to send men to war?

Because to do otherwise denies them the franchise, which in the US is no longer connected to being eligible for military service.

 

[Zincwarrior]

No female real combat soldiers. It takes men willing to go to war to create and make peace.

Thats great I guess.

 

[Leo123]

Because to do otherwise denies them the franchise, which in the US is no longer connected to being eligible for military service.

Men are denied the franchise not to go to war. They have to register with selective service. Women are free to vote for a war they cannot physically support.

 

[martybegan]

Men are denied the franchise not to go to war. They have to register with selective service. Women are free to vote for a war they cannot physically support.

Selective service is an outdated concept, not needed anymore. Everyone has such a digital footprint these days finding them for a draft would be easy without the Selective Service database.

I would extend it to women. they can always go into the factories as a labor force if things ever got bad enough for a draft to happen again.

 

[Leo123]

Selective service is an outdated concept, not needed anymore. Everyone has such a digital footprint these days finding them for a draft would be easy without the Selective Service database.

I would extend it to women. they can always go into the factories as a labor force if things ever got bad enough for a draft to happen again.

If a man does not register with Selective Service he can be fined $250,000 or 5 years in prison. They will be ineligible for federal aid, federal employment, job training programs and driver's licenses in some States. SS may be 'outdated' but it is in full force today.

SS is not needed for women because they are not called to put their lives on the line compared to men.

 

[Leo123]

Thats great I guess.

What's great about it? War is literal Hell on Earth. You gonna let some woman tell you to charge a machine gun nest?

 

[martybegan]

If a man does not register with Selective Service he can be fined $250,000 or 5 years in prison. They will be ineligible for federal aid, federal employment, job training programs and driver's licenses in some States. SS may be 'outdated' but it is in full force today.

SS is not needed for women because they are not called to put their lives on the line compared to men.

When was the last time that was enforced?

 

[Leo123]

When was the last time that was enforced?

It's enforced today, men MUST register and, of course, most men do today without coercion as our country is not at war. If we go full on war, SS ensures man can't skate. Men are subject to conscription, women are not.

 

[martybegan]

It's enforced today, men MUST register and, of course, most men do today without coercion as our country is not at war. If we go full on war, SS ensures man can't skate. Men are subject to conscription, women are not.

Registering doesn't mean you will get conscripted, hence why I consider it something to just get rid of.

Women can and should be allowed to vote, you won't convince me otherwise.

 

[Zincwarrior]

What's great about it? War is literal Hell on Earth. You gonna let some woman tell you to charge a machine gun nest?

What a strange, yet incoherent argument. Impressive.

 

[Leo123]

Registering doesn't mean you will get conscripted, hence why I consider it something to just get rid of.

Women can and should be allowed to vote, you won't convince me otherwise.

So, you want conscription without consent. Got it and good luck with that. My question was why should women be allowed to vote for men to go to war? SS or not, in the case of a horrible war, if you are a man, you WILL be conscripted and your age will not be a factor.

 

[Leo123]

What a strange, yet incoherent argument. Impressive.

You can't answer can you?

 

[martybegan]

So, you want conscription without consent. Got it and good luck with that. My question was why should women be allowed to vote for men to go to war? SS or not, in the case of a horrible war, if you are a man, you WILL be conscripted and your age will not be a factor.

Why should I expect a firefighter to fight fires when I don't do it?

Society has roles, people choose those roles. You can always deny conscription if you feel that way, (if it ever happens again).

Hell, I would probably be one of the first taken, I have a Masters in Chemical Engineering, and would thrown into the "leaky suit brigades"

 

[Zincwarrior]

You can't answer can you?

I literally have no idea what your point is related to the topic. I mean old people and handicapped people vote to. What that has to do with the topic is...?

 

[Leo123]

I literally have no idea what your point is related to the topic. I mean old people and handicapped people vote to. What that has to do with the topic is...?

Did you know old men can be conscripted into service? It happened during WWI and WWII. If you have 'no idea of my point' why do you continue to post this garbage?

Let me make it easy for you.....Do you agree that women can vote to send men into combat?