Zone1 Is Feminism Destroying the West?

[Company 13]

First you say women are paid equally now then you say women are being paid less. Make up your mind. The teachers unions have done nothing about giving teachers higher wages. All they have done is promote transgender grooming for kids. 'Back in day' I actually worked for an electronics manufacturing company whose CEO, and my direct boss, was a woman so, your claims seem false.

I said women are paid equally? If I did, it was a typo.
You are wrong about the unions. But I know you have to get in those talking points.
Sweetie, my back in the day goes back further than yours. My back in the day is when there were no women bosses. Even school principals and superintendents were all men until the 80s.
EditL: I take that last sentence back. I did attend a school before the 80s that had a woman principal. And woman drove the school buses. But where I live now, the first woman principal was in the 80s. And the first woman bus driver was in the 70s.

 

[initforme]

Why ? Ok minus traditional Christian or secular women that hold to the principles and standards that God has proven works time and time again, otherwise if they are followed they end up working perfectly, but liberal leftist women whose numbers have been growing significantly over time in this nation, are of the complete opposite in thinking now. This is where the question was asked about them wanting to destroy and replace came from.

It's a fair question that deserves a fair answer.

An insignificant number of women who dont want the old tradition arent trying to destroy anything. Get over it. So over the top its comical.

 

[Leo123]

I said women are paid equally? If I did, it was a typo.
You are wrong about the unions. But I know you have to get in those talking points.
Sweetie, my back in the day goes back further than yours. My back in the day is when there were no women bosses. Even school principals and superintendents were all men until the 80s.

You said: "They are paid equally now.' How has the teacher's union(s) increased teacher wages? 80's? Dear, I'm talking 60's and 70's. In the 80's my kids had predominately women teachers, principals and superintendents. Maybe if men were running things, teachers would be making more today.

 

[Leo123]

An insignificant number of women who dont want the old tradition arent trying to destroy anything. Get over it. So over the top its comical.

It only takes a few radicals to overturn a society. See the rise of Nazi Germany.

 

[initforme]

First you say women are paid equally now then you say women are being paid less. Make up your mind. The teachers unions have done nothing about giving teachers higher wages. All they have done is promote transgender grooming for kids. 'Back in day' I actually worked for an electronics manufacturing company whose CEO, and my direct boss, was a woman so, your claims seem false.

Now youre onto unions. The entity that used to provide for a wage that could support a family. The irony is palpable.

 

[initforme]

It only takes a few radicals to overturn a society. See the rise of Nazi Germany.

Even more laughable comparing nazi germany to feminism. Thanks for the laugh.

 

[initforme]

It only takes a few radicals to overturn a society. See the rise of Nazi Germany.

Even more laughable comparing nazi germany to feminism.

 

[Company 13]

You said: "They are paid equally now.' How has the teacher's union(s) increased teacher wages? 80's? Dear, I'm talking 60's and 70's. In the 80's my kids had predominately women teachers, principals and superintendents. Maybe if men were running things, teachers would be making more today.

OK. There are laws now preventing unequal pay. In the 60s and 70s, there was not equal pay for equal work.
Men used to run things and teachers were paid less.

 

[initforme]

You said: "They are paid equally now.' How has the teacher's union(s) increased teacher wages? 80's? Dear, I'm talking 60's and 70's. In the 80's my kids had predominately women teachers, principals and superintendents. Maybe if men were running things, teachers would be making more today.

Youd be crying from the heavens if a teacher made a good wage.

 

[Leo123]

Oh, for goodness.
More powerful than that would be having abortions that they need instead of dying.
More powerful than that would be deciding not to have children without facing insults from society.
More powerful than that would be making laws and enforcing laws.
Also, not all women are capable of "ushering in new life."

No woman has ever died due to an abortion refusal for her life threatening condition. That's just bullshit. More powerful than deciding not to have children is not to have procreational type sex. Most women are capable of ushering in new life. Your plea to the scant minority to make a point is laughable.

 

[Leo123]

Youd be crying from the heavens if a teacher made a good wage.

No, I would not. I actually think all teachers (male and female) are grossly under paid. Stop projecting.

 

[Company 13]

It only takes a few radicals to overturn a society. See the rise of Nazi Germany.

In which case, it only takes a few radicals to improve society. That's what the women's rights movements have done.

 

[Leo123]

OK. There are laws now preventing unequal pay. In the 60s and 70s, there was not equal pay for equal work.
Men used to run things and teachers were paid less.

I worked for a woman boss who made much more than me in the 60's and 70's. When I was a teen, I worked in a large hotel restaurant as a bus boy. The waitresses made a whole lot more than me and got to keep most of the tips.

 

[Company 13]

No woman has ever died due to an abortion refusal for her life threatening condition. That's just bullshit. More powerful than deciding not to have children is not to have procreational type sex. Most women are capable of ushering in new life. Your plea to the scant minority to make a point is laughable.

Yes, women have died who needed abortions and couldn't get them. To deny that is bullshit.
Someone can have sex and the contraception not work. A woman could have religious objections to contraception and get pregnant.
Yes, there are few who can have children. But I thought you were trying to say women should be so joyful about the wonder of giving birth that they should joyfully forgo a career.

 

[OODA_Loop]

Oh, for goodness.
More powerful than that would be having abortions that they need instead of dying.
More powerful than that would be deciding not to have children without facing insults from society.
More powerful than that would be making laws and enforcing laws.
Also, not all women are capable of "ushering in new life."

What would be powerful is for women to be more responsible with their reproductive activities.

Much like we demand of gun owners.

 

[initforme]

What would be powerful is for women to be more responsible with their reproductive activities.

Much like we demand of gun owners.

True. Slowly but surely the birth rate is dropping. Thats a good sign. They are being more responsible.

 

[Leo123]

In which case, it only takes a few radicals to improve society. That's what the women's rights movements have done.

Yes, Trump has improved society by leaps and bounds however, so called 'women's rights movements' have outlived their women's voters rights mission and have infiltrated men's rights.

Compared to the past, women today have more freedom and opportunities but, some data suggest that their relative happiness (compared to men) has not risen. Supporting what all men instinctively know, women are never really satisfied with money, things and power. That's because men and women are DIFFERENT and the differences are meant to be complimentary not competitive.

 

[OODA_Loop]

True. Slowly but surely the birth rate is dropping. Thats a good sign. They are being more responsible.

Rectal conception doesn’t provide for procreation [except for certain USMB posters] so that skews the numbers downward.

 

[Leo123]

True. Slowly but surely the birth rate is dropping. Thats a good sign. They are being more responsible.

We are now below replacement rate. How is that 'good' or 'responsible?'

 

[initforme]

We are not below replacement rate. How is that 'good' or 'responsible?'

Yes i know and agree we are not below replacement rate. So wheres the issue?