Zone1 Is Feminism Destroying the West?

Yes i know and agree we are not below replacement rate. So wheres the issue?
Typo, should have been 'now' but you knew that and saw fit to take a cheap shot. Already edited.
 
We are now below replacement rate. How is that 'good' or 'responsible?'
Its not a responsibilty to have kids. Its a choice. Have them if thats your goal and dont have them if one doesnt want them. Do you see how its ok either way?
 
What would be powerful is for women to be more responsible with their reproductive activities.

Much like we demand of gun owners.
Actually, they probably are more responsible with their reproductive activities than gun owners are with guns.
 
Actually, they probably are more responsible with their reproductive activities than gun owners are with guns.
Not even close


In the United States, over one million abortions were performed in 2023.
According to the Guttmacher Institute, there were approximately 1,038,100 clinician-provided abortions in 2024, reflecting a slight increase from the previous year


18,874​

The number of firearm deaths, excluding suicides, in 2023

 
Not even close


In the United States, over one million abortions were performed in 2023.
According to the Guttmacher Institute, there were approximately 1,038,100 clinician-provided abortions in 2024, reflecting a slight increase from the previous year


18,874​

The number of firearm deaths, excluding suicides, in 2023

Roe is gone... issue has been taken care of. President Trump did an awesome thing taking care of the issue.
 
DNA defines a unique life.

That DNA in the zygote will most likely develop into a fully formed human being. Abortion kills that life and kills any opportunity for that life to become a person. I already schooled you on your stupid single cell argument. Humans are made of probably millions of living cells. Your shallow thinking is obvious. What makes me 'anti-abortion' by schooling you on the scientific facts of human life? No one coronated Candice Owens except maybe you. Calling me names is a childish move. k

'Toxic masculinity' is a term with no real proof. It's just female toxic speech. If you ask me, today there is more 'toxic femininity.'
Toxic masculinity has plenty of proof if you understand what it actually means. But, if you're going to me triggered snowflake about it, then that is your problem.

You could make a case for toxic femininity, absoöutely.
Here is a toxic female being schooled.




How is any one of them being toxic? The first one is being belittled and the last one just talks about a date
 
Last edited:
Ok I'll say it, because God designed us the way we are, and he gave us thousands of year's of evidence that proves everything that we know to be true, otherwise as is experienced by trial and then error when we attempt to play a god ourselves. Stop trying to be a god, and start understanding the one true God.
Ew, cringe.
 
Its not a responsibilty to have kids. Its a choice. Have them if thats your goal and dont have them if one doesnt want them. Do you see how its ok either way?
Humans are made to procreate. That is not a choice.
 
A married couple using contraception is immoral? How?
Christianity (aka Catholicism) requires 3 thinks for sex to be okay
1. One husband, one wife
2. Both consent, foster unity/intimacy, avoid pure lust
3. Open to procreation.

Using contraception is you trying to nullify God's design.
 
That doesn't prove there's more depression there is more depression than before. The far right just needs to believe that for some weird reason.
It proves that women require more anti-depressants than men, which has been my claim, and for which I've provided reasons for.
 
Toxic masculinity has plenty of proof if you understand what it actually means. But, if you're going to me triggered snowflake about it, then that is your problem.

You could make a case for toxic femininity, absoöutely.

How is any one of them being toxic? The first one is being belittled and the last one just yalks about a date
‘Yalking’ is toxic. The first one is just a nasty dyke.
 
Last edited:
What would be powerful is for women to be more responsible with their reproductive activities.

Much like we demand of gun owners.
So you can complain about them not having children instead?
 
Last edited:
Contraceptives are used to prevent pregnancy (and they sometimes fail). Abortion is used to terminate a pregnancy.
Exactly, so the abortion is used when the contraception fails as a method of contraception.

Thank you, you made my point for me.

92-95% of abortions are due to unintended pregnancies. Not rape, not youth... just because the mom or parents didn't want them, so they killed em. That's contraception.
 
All of the feminists in here calling people mysoginists are just exposing themselves as out of rhetoric or arguments. Every time you use it, you weaken your credibility, and the term itself.
 
Christianity (aka Catholicism) requires 3 thinks for sex to be okay
1. One husband, one wife
2. Both consent, foster unity/intimacy, avoid pure lust
3. Open to procreation.

Using contraception is you trying to nullify God's design.
Well #3 is wrong, impractical. Using that logic a married couple who wants a very small family or no kids at all would have to remain celibate totally. Not tenable in todays world. Goes against morals.
 
15th post
She's being belittled by the podcast host.

You obviously had to choose a crypyo-racist clip too.
She is being challenged and is actually belittling herself not being able to adequately reply.
 
Its not a responsibilty to have kids. Its a choice. Have them if thats your goal and dont have them if one doesnt want them. Do you see how its ok either way?
Stop projecting.. it's what ought to be encouraged in society that's the issue. You keep taking it personally. People are free to not have kids, but capable young people who are fit and based should be encouraged to have them, and society should praise them for it.
 
Well #3 is wrong, impractical.
Take that up with God. I'm not talking laws, I'm talking Christian morality.
Using that logic a married couple who wants a very small family or no kids at all would have to remain celibate totally. Not tenable in todays world. Goes against morals.
How is celibacy not tenable? And how is it going against morals?
 
Back
Top Bottom