Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Which has only increased the massive scientific consensus long supporting AGW or "Climate Change" tyvm!Every scientific principle is valid only as long as it supports all the available data and observations. The scope of our data and observations grow constantly.
Dear me. It is only contentious amongst oil company executives and the gullible drones that parrot their fake science.
Climate Change is a Liberal Plot to piss off Republicans
Another counterpoint free reply, still no counter to the main point either.
Come on you can't be that stupid?
you keep ignoring the NOAA and Hadcrut4 data:
You ignored post 102 again. the monthly rise of CO2 doesn't match with the monthly temperature changes.
In response, you do the "NANANANANANA I CAN'T HEAR YOU!" thing.
Dear me. It is only contentious amongst oil company executives and the gullible drones that parrot their fake science.
So being in an interglacial cycle has nothing to do with the planet warming?Some of the things that are contentious are:
The exact mechanism that causes climate to change. That is contentious.
That is utter nonsense. The very nearly unanimous opinion of active climate scientists is that the global warming of the last 150 years is being caused by the greenhouse effect acting on excess CO2 produced by the combustion of fossil fuels. You knew that was a fact several years ago, you just seem to lack the honesty to admit it.
Run away.Which has only increased the massive scientific consensus long supporting AGW or "Climate Change" tyvm!Every scientific principle is valid only as long as it supports all the available data and observations. The scope of our data and observations grow constantly.
Unlike the piddling support AGW denialists such as yourself continue to enjoy among climate related scientists. In"valid"ate yourself much? <That's rhetorical. (Don't answer it).
So being in an interglacial cycle has nothing to do with the planet warming?
Since the slow cooling of the past 6000-8000 years
We are still below the peak temperatures of the previous interglacial cycles, dear. We never got above them.So being in an interglacial cycle has nothing to do with the planet warming?
Nope. Natural factors are trying to make the planet cool now. Since the slow cooling of the past 6000-8000 years suddenly turned into fast warming, we know that's not part of any natural cycle, and that humans are the cause.
This is basic stuff. If you don't know it, you have no business bothering the grownups.
We are still below the peak temperatures of the previous interglacial cycles, dear. We never got above them.
But if you are arguing we were heading for a glacial cycle and CO2 saved us from that, that's a great argument you are making.
8,000 years ago, when much of Europe and North America looked like this?
I dispute your claim that's how.We are still below the peak temperatures of the previous interglacial cycles, dear. We never got above them.
And how is that relevant to the fact that humans are causing the fast warming now, fast warming that will continue?
But if you are arguing we were heading for a glacial cycle and CO2 saved us from that, that's a great argument you are making.
Great idea. Overheat the earth now to stop the ice age in 20,000 years. You're essentially arguming that you need to run the furnace full blast staring in July because winter is eventually coming. That's some special kind of stupid.
I dispute your claim that's how.
Actually 580 ppm is not going to overheat the planet. 580 ppm will keep the planet from entering a glacial period. That's a good thing.
