Iran Hangs First Batch Of Mossad Collaborators.

[Rigby5]

WRONG

You are posting lies not history

we never took over any of those nations and you cannot demonstrate that we did

That comes off pretty crazy, to claim the US did not invade and take over Iraq and Afghanistan.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Wrong.
The spread of Islam had nothing to do with war.
It was just a superior social system, that had things like welfare for widows and orphans.

That easy to prove.
For example, your map claims the Moors in the Iberian peninsula was an expansion of Arab caliphate.
That obviously is a lie because the Moors were from the independent country of Morocco, and had nothing at all to do with any caliphate.

No one said anything about a caliphate which is unnecessary for jigad or muslims expansion

The crusades were a response to muslim aggression which is mandated by the Koran

 

[Soupnazi630]

That comes off pretty crazy, to claim the US did not invade and take over Iraq and Afghanistan.

We invaded we did not take them over MORON

your claims are ALWAYS proven to be manufactured crap which you dream up from thin air

 

[Stryder50]

That comes off pretty crazy, to claim the US did not invade and take over Iraq and Afghanistan.

We didn't do such for the false reasons you suggest.
Both were counter-offensives responding to threats and actions of those two nations.

 

[Rigby5]

Iran is predominately Shiite.*
Iran was a mix of Shiite and Sunni.
The Persians were centuries ago. Their "empire" gone by the time Mohammad had his visions from Allah.

* About half the insurgents my son and his fellows killed or captured carried gave markers in Farsi language. Farsi the predominate language of Iran.

The point is that western colonial imperialists keep invading and taking over.
Like the British invaded and stole Kuwait from Iraq around 1890. The British also stole Yemen for a naval base.

If not for western colonial imperialists, likely most Shiites would be in a single nation.

 

[Soupnazi630]

The point is that western colonial imperialists keep invading and taking over.
Like the British invaded and stole Kuwait from Iraq around 1890. The British also stole Yemen for a naval base.

If not for western colonial imperialists, likely most Shiites would be in a single nation.

No the point is that NOTHING you say is ACCURATE OR TRUE

That has been proven beyond question

 

[Rigby5]

WRONG


There is no record whatsoever of North being sent by anyone anywhere NEAR any iranian representatives before the election

Your claim is a BALD FACED LIE

SDI was not the least bit illegal and had little to do with LEGAL DEFENSIVE weapons in space

SOcialism and communism is evil less efficient and always fails

Wrong.
Oliver North was convicted for delaying the hostage release.
{...
WASHINGTON -- Oliver North, the former White House aide once praised by President Ronald Reagan as 'a true American hero,' was convicted Thursday of three felonies and cleared of nine other charges from the Iran-Contra scandal.

A federal jury of nine women and three men convicted North, 45, a former staff member of the National Security Council, of destroying official documents, accepting an illegal gift of a $13,800 home security system and of aiding and abetting the obstruction of Congress in November 1986.
...}

Why else would there be the coincidence that Iran released the hostages right after Carter lost the election?

SDI was going to put nukes into space.
That is totally illegal.

Communism and socialism not only are always more successful, but what most of the world uses. In fact, the US schools system, post office, roads, harbors, libraries, stadiums, etc. are all communist or socialist, and far more efficient than privatization.
Privatization always doubles the price of everything by adding on the layers of profit charges.

 

[Rigby5]

Nope it was not legal to invade kuwait and they stole NOTHING

the US was righ to defend them

You are a liar there IS NO SUCH VIDEO

No opinion of concern is not granting permission you lying sack of this

911 was unjustified and unprovoked

We are the greatest of natiuons and do more for the world tjhan any other which is why ALL Of YOUR accusations are made up fiction

That is just silly.
In fact, Kuwait used to be and should still be part of Iraq, since it clearly is their coastline.
The British illegally stole Kuwait from Iran in the 1890s.

 

[JohnDB]

 

[Rigby5]

Clearly you are both ignorant and an idiot.
Safe to assume most reading here will see that and no reason for me to correct your mistakes, ignorance and lies.

BTW, history doesn't repeat itself.
Correct concept is: "Those who fail to learn the lessons of history are fated to repeat them."

Applies to you in your personal life it seems.

Wrong.

First of all, many people have said many similar things.
{...
Edmund Burke (1729-1797) said "Those who don't know history are destined to repeat it."

George Santayana (1863-1952) said "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it."
...}

But that has nothing at all to do with the fact it is well known that history shows a constant repetition.

{...
The phrase "history repeats itself" refers to the idea that similar events tend to occur again throughout history, often due to recurring patterns. This concept suggests that we can observe patterns across historical events, and it emphasizes the importance of learning from past mistakes to avoid repeating them. Karl Marx famously stated that history repeats itself first as tragedy, then as farce, highlighting the cyclical nature of events. Examples of this phenomenon include the invasions of Russia by Napoleon and Hitler, as well as economic downturns like the Great Recession and the Great Depression. Overall, understanding these patterns can provide valuable insights into current events and future possibilities.
...}

 

[Rigby5]

We invaded we did not take them over MORON

your claims are ALWAYS proven to be manufactured crap which you dream up from thin air

That makes no sense.
Why would we invade innocent countries unless it was to "take them over" and take them over is what we did.
Like with Iraq, we took over all their oil sales and made them go through US companies.

 

[JohnDB]

That makes no sense.
Why would we invade innocent countries unless it was to "take them over" and take them over is what we did.
Like with Iraq, we took over all their oil sales and made them go through US companies.

However the profits from those oil sales went to pay their debts as well as fund their infrastructure we destroyed....including police salaries, hospitals, electricity generation and a host of other civilian needs. (Oil companies got reasonable "handling fees")

 

[Rigby5]

We didn't do such for the false reasons you suggest.
Both were counter-offensives responding to threats and actions of those two nations.

Nonsense.
There was no offensive from Iraq or Afghanistan, so there could not have been any "counter-offensives".
Neither Iraq nor Afghanistan ever made any "threats" or hostile "actions" to the US.

In fact, Afghanistan offered to extradite Osama bin Laden to Saudi Arabia, and we refused.

Face facts, we simply invaded these countries because we wanted to expand our empire.

 

[Rigby5]

However the profits from those oil sales went to pay their debts as well as fund their infrastructure we destroyed....including police salaries, hospitals, electricity generation and a host of other civilian needs. (Oil companies got reasonable "handling fees")

Wrong.
The profits from these oil sales also went to US companies in Texas.
And they still do.
The US took over what used to be nationalized, and privatized Iraq's oil, for the benefit of Texas billionaires.

 

[irosie91]

Wrong.
The spread of Islam had nothing to do with war.
It was just a superior social system, that had things like welfare for widows and orphans.

That easy to prove.
For example, your map claims the Moors in the Iberian peninsula was an expansion of Arab caliphate.
That obviously is a lie because the Moors were from the independent country of Morocco, and had nothing at all to do with any caliphate.

easy to find out----we can ask my Dhimmi. uhm UMAYYAD CALIPHATE---learn
some history, rigs

 

[Soupnazi630]

That makes no sense.
Why would we invade innocent countries unless it was to "take them over" and take them over is what we did.
Like with Iraq, we took over all their oil sales and made them go through US companies.

We did not take them over

What makes no sense is why YOU constantly repeat the same proven lies

Taking over oil sales is NOT taking over the country

 

[JohnDB]

Wrong.
The profits from these oil sales also went to US companies in Texas.
And they still do.
The US took over what used to be nationalized, and privatized Iraq's oil, for the benefit of Texas billionaires.

Who Exactly and precisely? Name names.

 

[Soupnazi630]

That is just silly.
In fact, Kuwait used to be and should still be part of Iraq, since it clearly is their coastline.
The British illegally stole Kuwait from Iran in the 1890s.

Nope it is a sovereign nation and it was not illegally stolen

 

[Rigby5]

That might be so, but your implications are the "fake news" here.
1) Judism has no prohibition on becoming a Jew. Nor requirement of being any particular race or ethic, or not of.
2) Hebrew origins, Abraham and his clan, are of Sumerian 'Semitic' peoples and lands. Back about 4000+ years ago.

While there is no racial prohibition on Judaism, the facts are Zionists are illegally claiming a right to steal Palestine by being the "Chosen People" and Palestine being the "Promised Land".
The Zionists have no legal, religious, ethical, or moral claim to Palestine.
So Israel should not exist at all, and was illegally created by murder and theft

While the original Hebrew are Abrahamic, Sumerian Semitic people, they were nomads in the Sinai, and have no claim to the Land of Canaan.
The Canaanites, Akkadians, etc. go back over 10,000 years ago, and were there constantly.
The Hebrew invaded around 1000 BC, but massacred the Canaanite woman and children at places like Jericho, so became so hated that the Assyrian defeated them and drove them out by about 800 BC.
And that is it.
There is no other significant rule by the Hebrew.
When King Herod pops up around 100 BC, that is a fake Roman puppet who only claimed to have converted to Judaism.

Again, the Hebrew were defeated by the Assyrians, Babylonians, Persians, Greeks, Seleucids, and Romans, so clearly their claim of the "Chosen People" is obviously entirely wrong.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Wrong.
Oliver North was convicted for delaying the hostage release.
{...
WASHINGTON -- Oliver North, the former White House aide once praised by President Ronald Reagan as 'a true American hero,' was convicted Thursday of three felonies and cleared of nine other charges from the Iran-Contra scandal.

A federal jury of nine women and three men convicted North, 45, a former staff member of the National Security Council, of destroying official documents, accepting an illegal gift of a $13,800 home security system and of aiding and abetting the obstruction of Congress in November 1986.
...}

Why else would there be the coincidence that Iran released the hostages right after Carter lost the election?

SDI was going to put nukes into space.
That is totally illegal.

Communism and socialism not only are always more successful, but what most of the world uses. In fact, the US schools system, post office, roads, harbors, libraries, stadiums, etc. are all communist or socialist, and far more efficient than privatization.
Privatization always doubles the price of everything by adding on the layers of profit charges.

Wrong

Dumbass


Oliver North was convicted for the arms for hostages deal. It was securing the release of hostages in other nation. It had nothing to do with the hostages held in iran before the elction.

It and north had nothing to do with the hostages undcer Carter you stupid retard

SDI had no intention or design to put ANY nukes in space it was striclty about shooting them down

Communsim and socialism are always less succesful

social services are not socialism