Iran Hangs First Batch Of Mossad Collaborators.

No....it's pretty much systemic throughout the Palestinian communities here in America....because "Death to America " was what they ALL were chanting as they marched in the streets of NY and LA and every other big city in America.

So I do NOT buy what you are selling.

First of all, they are correct that the US has done lots of really evil things.
Secondly is that it is a bad translation, and the intent is to defeat US imperialism actually.

So you SHOULD "buy" what they are selling, because it is a legal and moral imperative.
 
First of all, they are correct that the US has done lots of really evil things.
Secondly is that it is a bad translation, and the intent is to defeat US imperialism actually.

So you SHOULD "buy" what they are selling, because it is a legal and moral imperative.
First of all they are wrong and you are a liar

The US is not imperialist

You are brainwashed by fools
 
First of all, they are correct that the US has done lots of really evil things.
Secondly is that it is a bad translation, and the intent is to defeat US imperialism actually.

So you SHOULD "buy" what they are selling, because it is a legal and moral imperative.
how do you say "our intent is to defeat US imperialism...." in arabic and
how do you say DEATH in arabic?
 
I don't know the names of the companies who are now the private owners of Iraqi oil because they are deliberately hidden.
But clearly Iraqi oil was public before the invasion and is private now.

{...
In February 2007, the Iraqi cabinet approved a draft law that would distribute oil revenues to the various regions and provinces of Iraq based on population, and would also give regional oil companies the authority to enter into contractual arrangements directly with foreign companies concerning the exploration and development of oil fields. Iraqis remained divided over provisions allowing regional governments to enter into contracts directly with foreign companies; while strongly supported by Kurds, Sunni Arabs wanted the Oil Ministry to retain signing power. As a compromise the draft law proposed that a new body called the Federal Oil and Gas Council would be created that could, in some circumstances, prevent execution of contracts signed by regional governments. This arrangement would undo the nationalization of the Iraqi oil industry that dates back to 1972.

Under Article I of the 2010 Law of Income Taxation on Foreign Oil Companies Working in Iraq, there is a 35% tax on "income earned in Iraq from the contracts signed with the Foreign Oil Companies, their subsidiaries, branches, or offices and their subcontractors working in Iraq in the field of oil and gas extraction and production and the relevant industries". The production contracts, which foreign oil companies enter into with the Iraqi federal or regional governments, often include revenue-sharing terms as well.
...}
History of petroleum industry in Iraq - Wikipedia

Seems to be EXACTLY as I have said and nothing like what you have claimed.

PLUS,
Iraq was under sanctions including the updating of their oil infrastructure and some parts and portions are made elsewhere.

So their petroleum infrastructure needed updating. That's what American companies (including royalties for parts my Grandfather invented) are good at.

Black skies of smoke from burning petroleum wells and pumps....I'm sure that stuff got damaged/worn out over the years.
Iraq is still a mess. I'm glad we are NOT involved in nation building in Iran.
 
That is totally untrue.
Palestinians have never been hostile to the US or Canada.

The obvious hostiles to the US and Canada are the Zionists who blew up the British peacekeepers in the King David Hotel.

Israel have NEVER been "friends".
Not only has Mossad been committing espionage against the US, but interfering in elections, not allowing use of any bases, etc., but Menachem Begin also gunned down the UN moderator, Folke Bernadotte.

I have no idea what you mean by, " 'Palestinians' didn't show up until AFTER the 6 day war."
The word Palestine goes back to before 2000 BC.
The Palestinians are the ancient Canaanites, Akkadians, Chaldeans, Phoenicians, Philistines, etc.
The 6 day war was in 1967, when Israel violated the UN partition and stole the West Bank and the Sinai, in a sneak attack that wiped out Egypt's air force.

Bull hockey....

I can't magically unsee the videos of Palestinians en masse chanting "Death to America". As well as "From the River to the Sea".
 
First of all, they are correct that the US has done lots of really evil things.
Secondly is that it is a bad translation, and the intent is to defeat US imperialism actually.

So you SHOULD "buy" what they are selling, because it is a legal and moral imperative.
Accepting my non-existent part for the "evil" the US government does?

Yeah....you are a radical Muslim terrorist if you believe that crap.
 
All lies

Kuwait was a soveriegn nation and Iraq was the unprovoked aggressor

No its not.
Kuwait was part of the Ottoman Empire until the British stole it.

{...
In May 1896, Shaikh Muhammad Al-Sabah was assassinated by his half-brother, Mubarak, who, in early 1897, was recognized, by the Ottoman sultan, as the qaimmaqam (provincial sub-governor) of Kuwait.

Mubarak's seizure of the throne via murder left his brother's former allies as a threat to his rule, especially as his opponents gained the backing of the Ottomans. In July, Mubarak invited the British to deploy gunboats along the Kuwaiti coast. Britain saw Mubarak's desire for an alliance as an opportunity to counteract German influence in the region and so agreed. This led to what is known as the First Kuwaiti Crisis, in which the Ottomans demanded that the British stop interfering with their empire. In the end, the Ottoman Empire backed down, rather than go to war.

In January 1899, Mubarak signed an agreement with the British which pledged that Kuwait would never cede any territory nor receive agents or representatives of any foreign power without the British Government's consent. In essence, this policy gave Britain control of Kuwait's foreign policy. The treaty also gave Britain responsibility for Kuwait's national security. In return, Britain agreed to grant an annual subsidy of 15,000 Indian rupees (£1,500) to the ruling family. In 1911, Mubarak raised taxes.
...}
 
Bull hockey....

I can't magically unsee the videos of Palestinians en masse chanting "Death to America". As well as "From the River to the Sea".

The meaning of the Palestinians is defeat of the puppet US government of Israel.
And "From the River to the Sea" just means a ONE STATE solution, which is obviously the only possible choice at this point.
 
No its not.
Kuwait was part of the Ottoman Empire until the British stole it.

{...
In May 1896, Shaikh Muhammad Al-Sabah was assassinated by his half-brother, Mubarak, who, in early 1897, was recognized, by the Ottoman sultan, as the qaimmaqam (provincial sub-governor) of Kuwait.

Mubarak's seizure of the throne via murder left his brother's former allies as a threat to his rule, especially as his opponents gained the backing of the Ottomans. In July, Mubarak invited the British to deploy gunboats along the Kuwaiti coast. Britain saw Mubarak's desire for an alliance as an opportunity to counteract German influence in the region and so agreed. This led to what is known as the First Kuwaiti Crisis, in which the Ottomans demanded that the British stop interfering with their empire. In the end, the Ottoman Empire backed down, rather than go to war.

In January 1899, Mubarak signed an agreement with the British which pledged that Kuwait would never cede any territory nor receive agents or representatives of any foreign power without the British Government's consent. In essence, this policy gave Britain control of Kuwait's foreign policy. The treaty also gave Britain responsibility for Kuwait's national security. In return, Britain agreed to grant an annual subsidy of 15,000 Indian rupees (£1,500) to the ruling family. In 1911, Mubarak raised taxes.
...}
Kuwait is and was an independant sovereign nation when Iraq illegally invaded
 
The meaning of the Palestinians is defeat of the puppet US government of Israel.
And "From the River to the Sea" just means a ONE STATE solution, which is obviously the only possible choice at this point.
You are definitely delusional and an extremist Muslim terrorist....need to be on several watch lists. If you aren't already.
 
Accepting my non-existent part for the "evil" the US government does?

Yeah....you are a radical Muslim terrorist if you believe that crap.

Do you deny the US invaded Mexico illegally twice, invaded Spanish colonies illegally, attacked Germany in WWI illegally, tried to illegally install Chaing Kai Shek as dictator in China, tried to illegally install Syngman Rhee as dictator in Korea, tried to install Diem as dictator in Vietnam, tried to install Batista as dictator in Cuba, tried to install Samosa as dictator in Nicaragua, illegally invaded Iraq and Afghanistan, illegally took over Libya, the Ukraine, Palestine, Syria, Egypt, etc.?
 
Do you deny the US invaded Mexico illegally twice, invaded Spanish colonies illegally, attacked Germany in WWI illegally, tried to illegally install Chaing Kai Shek as dictator in China, tried to illegally install Syngman Rhee as dictator in Korea, tried to install Diem as dictator in Vietnam, tried to install Batista as dictator in Cuba, tried to install Samosa as dictator in Nicaragua, illegally invaded Iraq and Afghanistan, illegally took over Libya, the Ukraine, Palestine, Syria, Egypt, etc.?

You are an Muslim Extremist Terrorist....why would ANYONE take ANYTHING you say as even remotely true....because you seek to destroy America and Israel under some sort of idealism promoted by pedophiles.

Your goals and ideals are opposite of anything good.
 
You are definitely delusional and an extremist Muslim terrorist....need to be on several watch lists. If you aren't already.

Wrong.
Palestine was promised independence for helping Lawrence of Arabia defeat the Ottoman empire.
The Zionists did not exist back in 1922 when the British did a census of the new nation of Palestine.
They did not infiltrate until the 1940s.
And its obvious the Zionists are the bad guys, since they are the ones who blew up the British peacekeepers in the King David Hotel, gunned down Folke Bernadotte the UN moderator, and massacred hundreds of native villages like Deir Yassin.
 
15th post
Wrong.
Palestine was promised independence for helping Lawrence of Arabia defeat the Ottoman empire.
The Zionists did not exist back in 1922 when the British did a census of the new nation of Palestine.
They did not infiltrate until the 1940s.
And its obvious the Zionists are the bad guys, since they are the ones who blew up the British peacekeepers in the King David Hotel, gunned down Folke Bernadotte the UN moderator, and massacred hundreds of native villages like Deir Yassin.
Blocked....
I have zero interest in talking to Muslim terrorists.
 
You are an Muslim Extremist Terrorist....why would ANYONE take ANYTHING you say as even remotely true....because you seek to destroy America and Israel under some sort of idealism promoted by pedophiles.

Your goals and ideals are opposite of anything good.

Wrong.
The principles of a republic are that you allow everyone their own self determination.
That includes allowing Iran to be whatever Iranians what it to be.
If you do not believe in allowing Iran to choose their own government, then you do not support the principles of a republic and are a traitor to the US.
 
You might recall there was an earlier war with Iraq, 1990-1991, over their invasion of Kuwait.
That war never ended. There was no Peace Treaty signed with Iraq.
Only an Armistice, with terms. Iraq was not complying with those terms.

I had a list nearly a dozen reasons long, since misplaced in my files and the website it was on has ceased to exist. So this is a rough recall, and partial at the moment.

1) Back to Armistice, but no Peace Treaty.
As mentioned, that means technically the first war never ended, was only on hold.
This is similar to the situation with North Korea where there is no Peace Treaty for the war of 1950-1953 which they started. Only a cease-fire~armistice. Which means that war could re-start at any moment. Hence the heavy deployment of troops on the border/DMZ by the USA and South Korea. This has been an unwanted expense and threat prevention focus for the USA, shouldn't be necessary. Especially if North Korea would cease it's hostile posture.

The USA was very reluctant to have another such unwanted tension and terms with another hostile nation, requiring unwanted deployment of USA military to guard and enforce terms like already exists with N. Korea. Not to mention the unwanted expense.
Ideally would see Iraq come to the table and sign a peace treaty.

2) One term of the Armistice was the No-Fly Zones on the borders with Iraq. Iraq was constantly targeting our patrols with their anti-aircraft weapons systems and provocative flights testing boundaries and resolve. There was increasing danger of such activity causing an incident that might renew the war.

3) Miss-use of "Oil for Food" fund$. Saddam/Iraq was diverting these funds towards increased weapons procurement which they were not supposed to be doing.

4) Violations of terms restricting increasing weapons procurement. See 3) above.

5) Iraq's efforts to destabilize and disrupt the use of the US Dollar in petroleum and other international trade arrangements.

6) Support for Islamic "terrorism" such as refugee to terrorists seeking to escape prosecution in the West and reward payments to terrorists and family survivors of slain terrorists.

7) Indications that an alleged anti-hijack/anti-terrorist training facility might also being used for training in doing terrorist attacks.

8) Obstructing and resisting certain WMD inspectors/inspections adding suspicion that they were trying to hide WMDs.

9) Active program of genocide against the 'Marsh Arabs' in Southern Iraq. A humanitarian concern.

10) Suspicious shipments from suspected WMD sites out of the country, mostly into Syria.

11) As mentioned in a previous post the environmental/ecological WMD of cutting water flow to the Southern Marshes. Injuring fisheries and migratory birds of the region.

That's a rough basic list as best I can recall two decades later.
Some were "official" and mentioned, others weren't but implied.

Wrong.
Kuwait was guilty of treaty violations amounting to acts of war.
They were stealing oil and dumping it below agreed prices, bankrupting Iraq.

So what Iraq did was legal, justified, and with the permission of US ambassador Glasspie.

1) What the US did to attack Iraqi forces was totally illegal.
Especially the illegal use of hyperbaric weapons on the Highway of Death, under a negotiated, white flag, retreat.

2) No-fly-zones are totally illegal and violated Iraqi sovereignty and air space.

3) Your idea of "Oil for Food" is all wrong. The point is that the US at first was criminal in blockading all food to Iraq. But then we finally allowed them to buy food, but at prices set by the US. The US delivered the food, so your claim of somehow "diverting funds" for weapons is totally impossible and makes no sense at all. Iraq had plenty of money for weapons, but were under the illegal US blockade.

All the rest is even less rational.
The WMD inspections were allowed and turned up nothing.
It was not until after years of this nonsense that Iraq finally halted inspections.
And they were never legal in the first place.
The final proof is the Deulfer and Keys ran inspections after we defeated Saddam, and they proved there never were any WMD at all.
It was all faked by the US.
The claim of shipping WMD to Syria is ridiculous since Syria was Shiite and Saddam was Sunni.

And you keep getting the southern marsh thing all wrong as well.
You keep claiming that somehow Saddam "cut the water" to the southern marshes, when that not only is impossible, but the opposite of what Saddam actually did, which was draining the marshes in order to end the malaria threat.
 
LIAR
The US actions on the hiway of death were legal acts of war


Glasspie NEVER gave any such permission you dishonest ************

the 911 attacks were unprovoked

War is only legal in defense of things like Kuwait treaty violations.
Nothing had been done to the US, so it was illegal for the US to be involved at all.

I watched the video, and heard US ambassador Glasspie tell Saddam the US had no position and did not care if invaded Kuwait.

The 9/11 attacks were provoked by many illegal crimes by the US, including the Highway of Death.
 
Back
Top Bottom