Iran Hangs First Batch Of Mossad Collaborators.

[Rigby5]

But they were not operating as agents of and on behalf of the Saudi government.
They, and the other Muslim nationals with them, were independent agents of the broad brush cause known as Islamic Jihad which wages war with the West and non-Muslim world, where-ever and how-ever they can.

USA support and organization of Islamic mujahedin against the Soviet's occupation in Afghanistan during the 1980s is a classic cause of drawing in Muslim would-be warriors from throughout the Dar el-Islam, partly for that cause, partly to get training, weapons, and future support for their later intended war against the non-Muslim world/West.

Wrong.
The WTC attack was a bad idea, but more than justified by the US evil on the Highway of Death.
Saddam had been given permission to invade Kuwait by US ambassador Glasspie.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Wrong.
The WTC attack was a bad idea, but more than justified by the US evil on the Highway of Death.
Saddam had been given permission to invade Kuwait by US ambassador Glasspie.

LIAR
The US actions on the hiway of death were legal acts of war


Glasspie NEVER gave any such permission you dishonest ************

the 911 attacks were unprovoked

 

[Rigby5]

Sorry komrade you are full of shyte.
Also full of communist, former USSR and current CCP propaganda.
And ignorance of your own design.

Wrong.
Clearly we installed the Shah in Iran in 1953 because we wanted to steal Iran's oil.
Clearly we attacked Iraq in 2003 because we wanted to steal Iraq's oil.

 

[Stryder50]

There is no such thing as "Islami Jihad".
There is no evidence of any aggressive Moslem Arabs.
All Mohammed fought was defensively against the Roman Byzantine invaders.
After 1200 AD, all that was the Asian waves like Mongols, Moghuls, Turks, Tatars, and Cossacks, and had nothing to do with Islam.

You flunked all of what little history you took in school.

World Map Showing The Spread Of Islam From 622-1700​

 

[Rigby5]

Wrong

The distant past has nothing to do with it and they are a terrorist state

Wrong.
History constantly repeats, and we repeated the 1953 take over of Iran with the 2003 illegal takeover of Iraq, Libya, Egypt, Syria, the Ukraine, etc.

 

[Stryder50]

Examples?

Start with examples of your own on what you think are fables.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Wrong.
History constantly repeats, and we repeated the 1953 take over of Iran with the 2003 illegal takeover of Iraq, Libya, Egypt, Syria, the Ukraine, etc.

WRONG

You are posting lies not history

we never took over any of those nations and you cannot demonstrate that we did

 

[Rigby5]

Wrong

They are extremist and have syupported terrorism for a ling time

We attack LEGALLY

The US is the main source of terrorism, with Israel being second.

Attacking is never legal, and clearly we lied to attack or take over Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan, Egypt, Syria, the Ukraine, Palestine, etc.

 

[Stryder50]

Wrong.
Iran is not extremists and has never attacked anyone.
It is the US that keeps illegally attacking everyone.

Your pravda is incorrect, komrade.
To the point you are now delusional.

 

[Soupnazi630]

The US is the main source of terrorism, with Israel being second.

Attacking is never legal, and clearly we lied to attack or take over Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan, Egypt, Syria, the Ukraine, Palestine, etc.

Wrong

The US is the main opponent of terrorism

Attacking IS LEGAL if our government approves of it

We did not take over those nations DUMMBASS

 

[Deadstick]

Start with examples of your own on what you think are fables.

Well i asked first, but if you insist, Russia intends invading Western Europe, the Salisbury Novichok attack, Syria used Chemical Weapons, Gaddafi intended killing everyone in Benghazi, WMD in Iraq, the Serbs were carrying out Genocide in Bosnia, that will do to be going on with.

 

[Stryder50]

I am not an expert, but since both Iran and Iraq are Shiite, likely Iraq used to be part of Iran or the Persians.

Iran is predominately Shiite.*
Iran was a mix of Shiite and Sunni.
The Persians were centuries ago. Their "empire" gone by the time Mohammad had his visions from Allah.

* About half the insurgents my son and his fellows killed or captured carried gave markers in Farsi language. Farsi the predominate language of Iran.

 

[Rigby5]

Reagan had no way of knowing he'd win that election. = false
USSR bankrupt itself because that is what results from socialism/communism if in place for too long.

Wrong.
Whether or not Reagan could predict the outcome of the election is irrelevant.
The point is he had more chances of winning if the hostages were not released before the election.
And it is on records that Reagan sent Col. Oliver North to negotiate with the Iranians right before the election, which is illegal.

It is well known that the USSR went bankrupt attempting to duplicate SDI, which was the illegal weaponizing of space.

Communism/socialism is always far more efficient and less expensive than capitalism.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Wrong.
Whether or not Reagan could predict the outcome of the election is irrelevant.
The point is he had more chances of winning if the hostages were not released before the election.
And it is on records that Reagan sent Col. Oliver North to negotiate with the Iranians right before the election, which is illegal.

It is well known that the USSR went bankrupt attempting to duplicate SDI, which was the illegal weaponizing of space.

Communism/socialism is always far more efficient and less expensive than capitalism.

WRONG


There is no record whatsoever of North being sent by anyone anywhere NEAR any iranian representatives before the election

Your claim is a BALD FACED LIE

SDI was not the least bit illegal and had little to do with LEGAL DEFENSIVE weapons in space

SOcialism and communism is evil less efficient and always fails

 

[Stryder50]

Wrong.
The WTC attack was a bad idea, but more than justified by the US evil on the Highway of Death.
Saddam had been given permission to invade Kuwait by US ambassador Glasspie.

Highway of Death is SOP in case of open war. Not as Evil as what Iraq did in Kuwait.
Saddam misunderstand the reply to what Gillespie thought was his asking about USA position regards dialog with Kuwait.

Your pravda is failing komrade.

 

[Rigby5]

LIAR
The US actions on the hiway of death were legal acts of war


Glasspie NEVER gave any such permission you dishonest ************

the 911 attacks were unprovoked

Wrong.
What was legal was Iraq invading Kuwait for their crimes of stealing oil.
Everything else, like the US attacking Iraqi troops, was totally illegal.

Glasspie in on video, giving permission to Saddam to do whatever he wanted.
Glasspie said the US had no opinion or concern and it was between Iraq and Kuwait.

The 9/11 attacks were way more than justified for all the illegal murders, wars, invasions, takeovers, etc. by the US.

 

[Stryder50]

Wrong.
Clearly we installed the Shah in Iran in 1953 because we wanted to steal Iran's oil.
Clearly we attacked Iraq in 2003 because we wanted to steal Iraq's oil.

Document that alleged theft of petroleum, please.
Otherwise just another pile of Leftist pravda.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Wrong.
What was legal was Iraq invading Kuwait for their crimes of stealing oil.
Everything else, like the US attacking Iraqi troops, was totally illegal.

Glasspie in on video, giving permission to Saddam to do whatever he wanted.
Glasspie said the US had no opinion or concern and it was between Iraq and Kuwait.

The 9/11 attacks were way more than justified for all the illegal murders, wars, invasions, takeovers, etc. by the US.

Nope it was not legal to invade kuwait and they stole NOTHING

the US was righ to defend them

You are a liar there IS NO SUCH VIDEO

No opinion of concern is not granting permission you lying sack of this

911 was unjustified and unprovoked

We are the greatest of natiuons and do more for the world tjhan any other which is why ALL Of YOUR accusations are made up fiction

 

[Stryder50]

Wrong.
History constantly repeats, and we repeated the 1953 take over of Iran with the 2003 illegal takeover of Iraq, Libya, Egypt, Syria, the Ukraine, etc.

Clearly you are both ignorant and an idiot.
Safe to assume most reading here will see that and no reason for me to correct your mistakes, ignorance and lies.

BTW, history doesn't repeat itself.
Correct concept is: "Those who fail to learn the lessons of history are fated to repeat them."

Applies to you in your personal life it seems.

 

[Rigby5]

You flunked all of what little history you took in school.

View attachment 1130011

World Map Showing The Spread Of Islam From 622-1700​

Wrong.
The spread of Islam had nothing to do with war.
It was just a superior social system, that had things like welfare for widows and orphans.

That easy to prove.
For example, your map claims the Moors in the Iberian peninsula was an expansion of Arab caliphate.
That obviously is a lie because the Moors were from the independent country of Morocco, and had nothing at all to do with any caliphate.