ESay
Gold Member
- Mar 14, 2015
- 10,874
- 2,529
- 140
Of course not. I think it is obvious.I assume your native tongue isn’t English.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Of course not. I think it is obvious.I assume your native tongue isn’t English.
Your lack of comprehensible grammar was a clue.Of course not. I think it is obvious.
Without a doubt. But I am okay with that. I am not going to be proficient in English.Your lack of comprehensible grammar was a clue.
which individual has done anything as a group?Jews have done nothing as a group for which they deserve to be criticized. Sure, there have been a few Jewish criminals over the years. Nevertheless, as a group Jews behave and perform well.
No, blaming an entire group based on the incidental identity of a single person. Or do you think that one should accuse all Christians and hold Christianity responsible because one serial killer happened to be Christian?FROM the IHRA, which the bill explicitly incorporates:
"Accusing Jews as a people of being responsible for real or imagined wrongdoing committed by a single Jewish person or group, or even for acts committed by non-Jews."
In other words, blaming Jews for what Jews do.
![]()
What is antisemitism?
With the IHRA working definition of antisemitism, the IHRA built international consensus around an answer to the question, what does antisemitism mean?holocaustremembrance.com
It’s my native tongue and I am barely fluent.Without a doubt. But I am okay with that. I am not going to be proficient in English.
Well, feel free to ask for clarification from me, if you happen to be interested in my point here or there.It’s my native tongue and I am barely fluent.
I don’t judge you for it. In fact, I wish I had an ability to speak as well as you do in a foreign language.
Substantively, I don’t always get what you’re trying to say. Or I just disagree with it a lot.
Will do.Well, feel free to ask for clarification from me, if you happen to be interested in my point here or there.
You tell 'em' ,Adolf.In about 27 states such laws are already in force, right here in the Land Of The Brave and Home Of The Free. Israel owns the US.
Oops, you didn't restate the argument honestly. I know that was unintentional. The bill says blaming for the actions of a group"No, blaming an entire group based on the incidental identity of a single person. Or do you think that one should accuse all Christians and hold Christianity responsible because one serial killer happened to be Christian?
Hey truth-speaker, lol, the example includes a "grouP of Jews."Wrong.
Let’s say you’re a retard. And you accuse all Jewish people for something done by just one Jewish person. That’s accusing Jews in general for one Jew’s actions. That is such a gross over-generalization that it is clear to all thinking people that you’re true intentions to simply smear Jewish people.
There’s a word for that. And that’s all the law says.
Ron Unzand Paul Craig Roberts
Oh, my God. Ever heard of the Bolsheviks? Jews were the greatest mass murderers of the 20th century. Per capita, no one evn comes close.Jews have done nothing as a group for which they deserve to be criticized. Sure, there have been a few Jewish criminals over the years. Nevertheless, as a group Jews behave and perform well.
I'm against all "hate" speech laws. And why do Jews ger a special law just forthemselves? No one else is "protected" from being blamed for what they do. No one else insists everybody buy their stupid Jewskin lampshades and poisonous shower heads nonsense or go to jail. Jews are a scourge with this shit.There are already plenty of laws on the books which compromise the notion of an absolute freedom of speech. There are hate-crime statutes on the books and we have codified speech which is subject to prior restraint. But if we make sure that the existing laws apply to Jews, that becomes a problem for people. One wonders why.
OK Bibi.You tell 'em' ,Adolf.
And if you then attack a random Japanese person because of association with that group? It is exactly that thinking that led to internment camps. The Japanese imperial navy, under orders from the Japanese government attacked Pearl Harbor. That guy who lives down the street and works at the Japanese restaurant didn't bomb pearl harbor.Oops, you didn't restate the argument honestly. I know that was unintentional. The bill says blaming for the actions of a group"
Do we say the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor in 1941?
Should we be charged with anti-Japanese discrimination if we do?
If you are against hatred speech laws then that's great if you are consistent. The thing is, you seem, seperatly to have a problem with Judaism. Your trying to rail against a wording of a bill is undermined by the obvious fact that it would affect you personally.I'm against all "hate" speech laws. And why do Jews ger a special law just forthemselves? No one else is "protected" from being blamed for what they do. No one else insists everybody buy their stupid Jewskin lampshades and poisonous shower heads nonsense or go to jail. Jews are a scourge with this shit.
The vast majority of the Bolsheviks were not Jewish. Virtually none of them were observant Jews.Oh, my God. Ever heard of the Bolsheviks? Jews were the greatest mass murderers of the 20th century. Per capita, no one evn comes close.
![]()
Nazis Were Better Humans Than the Bolsheviks. Not. Even. Close.
The Nazis encouraged smart people to have more children. The Bolsheviks murdered the children of smart people.craignelsen.substack.com