playtime
Diamond Member
- Aug 18, 2015
- 55,575
- 47,977
- 3,645
I would use the Hitlery Clinton defense: "I don't recall".
Don't have to take the 5th, don't have to answer anything.
too late.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I would use the Hitlery Clinton defense: "I don't recall".
Don't have to take the 5th, don't have to answer anything.
Sure, why not? Just lie.I would use the Hitlery Clinton defense: "I don't recall".
Don't have to take the 5th, don't have to answer anything.
And just think, people thought that organized crime was a thing of the past.
Now we have the Trump family to deal with. Oops!
Correct. His lawyer said it is a witch hunt, if they have a case have em prove it. Guess you're not very bright. Not a surprise.Eric Trump took the 5th 500 times because the govt. has a "weak case"?
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
Doesn't matter what you think or what I think, does it?I pretty much think the same about Harris as I do Trump. Neither are bright enough to be making public statements.
Again, why testify if you don't have to? Pleading the 5th is allowed. Change the law but don't blame those who follow it.on jan 5th roger stone spoke at a 'stop the steal ' rally & used some of the very same oathkeepers that were just arrested for seditious conspiracy - as his personal security.
roger stone pleaded the 5th when congress wanted him to testify under oath abut jan. 6...
huh, curious that.
Who isn’t?they are all guilty AF.
Did you expect his lawyer to admit his client is guilty?Correct. His lawyer said it is a witch hunt, if they have a case have em prove it. Guess you're not very bright. Not a surprise.
IF they had a solid case he would tell him to testify to tell his version...like Rittenhouse did. Here they don't have very much if anything is my educated guess.Did you expect his lawyer to admit his client is guilty?
Why do you imagine that Trump was correct? I have to imagine that he was not correct.James’s office noted that Eric Trump and Trump Organization chief financial officer Allen Weisselberg each invoked the Fifth Amendment more than 500 times.
Eric Trump did so during an Oct. 5, 2020, interview: “Eric Trump then invoked his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination in response to more than 500 questions over six hours.”
4 big points from the N.Y. attorney general’s Trump allegations
I suppose this is related to other threads noting Trump being investigated but you have to get a special chuckle over this.
Trump made the statements concerning Hillary associated taking the fifth. I have to imagine he was correct and for the most part I see this as verification that Trump and Hillary are pretty much the same where corruption is concerned.
An important part of proving is to ask questions and analyze the answers. Eric Trump had answers and avoided the answers because he was most likely guilty. The Trumps are hardly innocent of wrong doing.Correct. His lawyer said it is a witch hunt, if they have a case have em prove it. Guess you're not very bright. Not a surprise.
You are guessing. If they have the documents and details of a crime they should be able to prove it. Trump isn’t doing anything illegal by pleading the 5th.Why do you imagine that Trump was correct? I have to imagine that he was not correct.
An important part of proving is to ask questions and analyze the answers. Eric Trump had answers and avoided the answers because he was most likely guilty. The Trumps are hardly innocent of wrong doing.
These cases are almost impossible to prove. I wish the AG luck. More waste of taxpayer dollars. NY has people pushing other people onto oncoming trains and she is worried about tax law. Amazing.too late.
Correct, he is not doing anything illegal. He simply does not want to incriminate himself or his father.You are guessing. If they have the documents and details of a crime they should be able to prove it. Trump isn’t doing anything illegal by pleading the 5th.
Bad guess. They may have plenty. Rittenhouse took the stand because he thought he could help his case.IF they had a solid case he would tell him to testify to tell his version...like Rittenhouse did. Here they don't have very much if anything is my educated guess.
It is allowed under the law. Usually it is when the prosecution has a weak case.
Or he doesn't have anything to defend because he didn't do anything wrong and doesn't wish to give the AG any credence? You have made up your mind already so it doesn't matter what you think tbhCorrect, he is not doing anything illegal. He simply does not want to incriminate himself or his father.
That doesn't make him innocent.
How can a guess be "bad"? We don't know what the AG has. LOLBad guess. They may have plenty. Rittenhouse took the stand because he thought he could help his case.
Trump said, "If you're innocent, why are you taking the Fifth Amendment?" He implied you are guilty if you take the Fifth.So just to be clear, this isn't partisan. No, not at all. If I bring up Democrats who took the fifth, you will start a thread about them and slam them too, yes siree. That's what you're saying