tax.com: So How Did the Bush Tax Cuts Work Out for the Economy?
The Republicans use this stick to beat away any hint of buying down the deficit. Why?
The Republicans use this stick to beat away any hint of buying down the deficit. Why?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
you must have missed the 6 years of full employment. Convenient to ignore those isnt it?
US Unemployment Rate by Year
2001 4.76
2002 5.78
2003 5.99
2004 5.53
2005 5.08
2006 4.63
2007 4.61
2008 5.76
2009 9.26
The United States Unemployment Rate By Year
you must have missed the 6 years of full employment. Convenient to ignore those isnt it?
Because they "imagine" how something is supposed to work and figure that's "good enough".
you must have missed the 6 years of full employment. Convenient to ignore those isnt it?
US Unemployment Rate by Year
2001 4.76
2002 5.78
2003 5.99
2004 5.53
2005 5.08
2006 4.63
2007 4.61
2008 5.76
2009 9.26
The United States Unemployment Rate By Year
Notice when it started to change? After Democrats took over! Thank you Obama!
When Bush was in office, here in Ohio, we had reports about businesses paying two dollars over minimum wage, because they were trying to attract new workers.
Now, you're lucky if you can find a job.
Liberals can push this pap, but the facts are too easy bring into evidence.
you must have missed the 6 years of full employment. Convenient to ignore those isnt it?
US Unemployment Rate by Year
2001 4.76
2002 5.78
2003 5.99
2004 5.53
2005 5.08
2006 4.63
2007 4.61
2008 5.76
2009 9.26
The United States Unemployment Rate By Year
Notice when it started to change? After Democrats took over! Thank you Obama!
When Bush was in office, here in Ohio, we had reports about businesses paying two dollars over minimum wage, because they were trying to attract new workers.
Now, you're lucky if you can find a job.
Liberals can push this pap, but the facts are too easy bring into evidence.
The right has certain faith based myths that do not work but they support them anyway.
tax.com: So How Did the Bush Tax Cuts Work Out for the Economy?
The Republicans use this stick to beat away any hint of buying down the deficit. Why?
you must have missed the 6 years of full employment. Convenient to ignore those isnt it?
Unemployment was 3.9% when Bush took office. Unemployment was never below 4% at any time after his tax cuts.
How could any of that be 'full' employment? How could 6% for most of 2003 be 'full employment' if UE had been 4% most of 2000?
How can your unemployment rate be 'full employment' if it's possible to go 2 points lower?
you must have missed the 6 years of full employment. Convenient to ignore those isnt it?
US Unemployment Rate by Year
2001 4.76
2002 5.78
2003 5.99
2004 5.53
2005 5.08
2006 4.63
2007 4.61
2008 5.76
2009 9.26
The United States Unemployment Rate By Year
Notice when it started to change? After Democrats took over! Thank you Obama!
When Bush was in office, here in Ohio, we had reports about businesses paying two dollars over minimum wage, because they were trying to attract new workers.
Now, you're lucky if you can find a job.
Liberals can push this pap, but the facts are too easy bring into evidence.
Can you tell us what Bush and the Democratic Congress did to cause unemployment to rise in 2008 and 2009?
Specifically?
Or are you just mindlessly repeating a fallacious talking point?
you must have missed the 6 years of full employment. Convenient to ignore those isnt it?
Unemployment was 3.9% when Bush took office. Unemployment was never below 4% at any time after his tax cuts.
How could any of that be 'full' employment? How could 6% for most of 2003 be 'full employment' if UE had been 4% most of 2000?
How can your unemployment rate be 'full employment' if it's possible to go 2 points lower?
you must have missed the 6 years of full employment. Convenient to ignore those isnt it?
US Unemployment Rate by Year
2001 4.76
2002 5.78
2003 5.99
2004 5.53
2005 5.08
2006 4.63
2007 4.61
2008 5.76
2009 9.26
The United States Unemployment Rate By Year
Notice when it started to change? After Democrats took over! Thank you Obama!
...
you must have missed the 6 years of full employment. Convenient to ignore those isnt it?
US Unemployment Rate by Year
2001 4.76
2002 5.78
2003 5.99
2004 5.53
2005 5.08
2006 4.63
2007 4.61
2008 5.76
2009 9.26
The United States Unemployment Rate By Year
Notice when it started to change? After Democrats took over! Thank you Obama!
When Bush was in office, here in Ohio, we had reports about businesses paying two dollars over minimum wage, because they were trying to attract new workers.
Now, you're lucky if you can find a job.
Liberals can push this pap, but the facts are too easy bring into evidence.
Can you tell us what Bush and the Democratic Congress did to cause unemployment to rise in 2008 and 2009?
Specifically?
Or are you just mindlessly repeating a fallacious talking point?
Here's a look at the institute's core proposals:
1. Develop new skills
One of the job market's biggest problems, the report says, is a mismatch between the skills workers now have and the skills required by potential new jobs. If current trends hold, McKinsey estimates the US will have a shortage of up to 1.5 million workers with a college degree or higher in 2020, while nearly 6 million Americans who lack a high school diploma will be unemployed.
Solutions could include more partnerships between employers and community colleges or vocational schools, a national jobs database to help people decide what careers to train for, and targeted federal scholarships.
The report estimates that six broad sectors health care, business services, leisure and hospitality, construction, manufacturing, and retail will account for as much as 85 percent of new jobs. (Those sectors account for 66 percent of all jobs in America today.)
MORE
tax.com: So How Did the Bush Tax Cuts Work Out for the Economy?
The Republicans use this stick to beat away any hint of buying down the deficit. Why?
tax.com: So How Did the Bush Tax Cuts Work Out for the Economy?
The Republicans use this stick to beat away any hint of buying down the deficit. Why?
Notice the Republicans immediately changed the thread to 'prove' it must be Obama's fault. Unemployment is a direct result of the Bush tax cuts, the Bush Adminsitrations failure to regulate both congress and industry and spend billions of dollars every month on a war of choice.
The RW echol chamber can lie - and do - over and over and over but the facts do not change. The first decade of the 21st C is known as the lost decade for a reason and history books in the distant future will refere to the Bush years in that way.
The only way out of this mess brought on my the total incomptence of Boooooooosh&Co. is too put Americans to work. And since American business seems content to sit on over 2 trillion dollars and not invest in America, it's up to the government to do so.