If Dems Won Everything, Why Are They So Crazy Mad?

[DrLove]

Obviously like everyone else, because they know they didn’t win.

Tucker Carlson Asks Question of the Day: The Democrats 'Won Everything,' Why Are They So 'Crazy-Person Mad'?

Fox News host Tucker Carlson began his opening monologue on Thursday with a simple question. “

redstate.com

Funny - We asked you the same question in 2016 and here you are - STILL mad at everyone and everything!

 

[XponentialChaos]

You should look at the election again in full and you will see what happened the votes for Trump were blocked and the votes were all for your favorite. Go do it, analyze well and then tell me if I'm wrong or not.

I watched it live. I was glued to the tv as it was happening.

If you have a convincing argument, then you should go present it to the courts.

You don't.

 

[Dalia]

Obviously like everyone else, because they know they didn’t win.

Tucker Carlson Asks Question of the Day: The Democrats 'Won Everything,' Why Are They So 'Crazy-Person Mad'?

Fox News host Tucker Carlson began his opening monologue on Thursday with a simple question. “

redstate.com

Funny - We asked you the same question in 2016 and here you are - STILL mad at everyone and everything!

Trump didn't steal the election like your old pig Biden.

 

[Dalia]

You should look at the election again in full and you will see what happened the votes for Trump were blocked and the votes were all for your favorite. Go do it, analyze well and then tell me if I'm wrong or not.

I watched it live. I was glued to the tv as it was happening.

If you have a convincing argument, then you should go present it to the courts.

You don't.

Probably you didn't see anything because it all suits you well.

 

[XponentialChaos]

Probably you didn't see anything because it all suits you well.

I'm being objective and the courts agree with me, even the conservative judges.

I would argue that you see a conspiracy theory without any evidence because that's what you want to be true.

To each their own.

 

[westwall]

Probably you didn't see anything because it all suits you well.

I'm being objective and the courts agree with me, even the conservative judges.

I would argue that you see a conspiracy theory without any evidence because that's what you want to be true.

To each their own.

An objective judge would allow evidence to be presented. Every case that was launched the judges refused to allow the evidence to be presented. That makes them complicit.

 

[Dalia]

Probably you didn't see anything because it all suits you well.

I'm being objective and the courts agree with me, even the conservative judges.

I would argue that you see a conspiracy theory without any evidence because that's what you want to be true.

To each their own.

So you're not going to look at the election again to confirm that he didn't have fraud?

 

[Weatherman2020]

Probably you didn't see anything because it all suits you well.

I'm being objective and the courts agree with me, even the conservative judges.

I would argue that you see a conspiracy theory without any evidence because that's what you want to be true.

To each their own.

Is that why Democrats say the voting machines are rigged?

 

[Weatherman2020]

Probably you didn't see anything because it all suits you well.

I'm being objective and the courts agree with me, even the conservative judges.

I would argue that you see a conspiracy theory without any evidence because that's what you want to be true.

To each their own.

So you're not going to look at the election again to confirm that he didn't have fraud?

There will be no postmortem of the voting process because shutup.

 

[XponentialChaos]

An objective judge would allow evidence to be presented. Every case that was launched the judges refused to allow the evidence to be presented. That makes them complicit.

Go take your issues up with them. Many of them were appointed by Trump himself.

 

[XponentialChaos]

So you're not going to look at the election again

I don’t need to look at it again. I saw it the first time.

 

[Dalia]

So you're not going to look at the election again

I don’t need to look at it again. I saw it the first time.

So you miss a lot too.

 

[XponentialChaos]

Is that why Democrats say the voting machines are rigged?

Submit evidence to the courts or I’ll disregard that claim as conspiracy theory nonsense.

 

[XponentialChaos]

So you miss a lot too.

If you had convincing evidence, then it would be simple to make your argument to the courts.

You don’t. You just have an unsubstantiated conspired theory.

 

[Dalia]

So you miss a lot too.

If you had convincing evidence, then it would be simple to make your argument to the courts.

You don’t. You just have an unsubstantiated conspired theory.

The court is blind like the Democrats.

 

[XponentialChaos]

The court is blind like the Democrats.

Maybe we’re all blind or maybe you’ve just been fooled to believe in a conspiracy theory lie with unconvincing evidence.

We disagree.

 

[westwall]

An objective judge would allow evidence to be presented. Every case that was launched the judges refused to allow the evidence to be presented. That makes them complicit.

Go take your issues up with them. Many of them were appointed by Trump himself.

Just proves that the swamp is large, and more corrupt than ever.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Is that why Democrats say the voting machines are rigged?

Submit evidence to the courts or I’ll disregard that claim as conspiracy theory nonsense.

Courts? Which courts? The one that ruled people can be slaves or the one that ruled American citizens can be put in concentration camps without trial. Twice.

 

[Dragonlady]

Obviously like everyone else, because they know they didn’t win.

Tucker Carlson Asks Question of the Day: The Democrats 'Won Everything,' Why Are They So 'Crazy-Person Mad'?

Fox News host Tucker Carlson began his opening monologue on Thursday with a simple question. “

redstate.com

People tend to get pissed off at dictator wannabe's who try to kill them and overthrown the government.

Donald Trump has just spent four years trying attacking, lying about, and attempting to jail Obama, Biden, and Clinton. And then he tried to kill the leadership of both parties and take over the government.

In most of the countries in the world, they wouldn't even have a trial. They would have just taken Trump out and shot him when the coup failed.

 

[colfax_m]

An objective judge would allow evidence to be presented. Every case that was launched the judges refused to allow the evidence to be presented. That makes them complicit.

Do you think that if this is repeated often enough, it will become true?