There is, no way, and never will be a way, to produce hydrogen for use as a fuel, that will not require more energy to be put into that process, than what you can get back out of it by burning that hydrogen.
You're trying to argue for the equivalent of perpetual motion.
A water-fuelled car is an automobile that hypothetically derives its energy directly from water. Water-fuelled cars have been the subject of numerous international patents, newspaper and popular science magazine articles, local television news coverage, and websites. The claims for these devices have been found to be pseudoscience and some were found to be tied to investment frauds. These vehicles may be claimed to produce fuel from water on board with no other energy input, or may be a hybrid claiming to derive some of its energy from water in addition to a conventional source (such as gasoline).
Water is fully oxidized hydrogen. Hydrogen itself is a high-energy, flammable substance, but its useful energy is released when water is formed. Water will not burn. The process of electrolysis can split water into hydrogen and oxygen, but it takes as much energy to take apart a water molecule as was released when the hydrogen was oxidized to form water. In fact, some energy would be lost in converting water to hydrogen and then burning the hydrogen because some waste heat would always be produced in the conversions. Releasing chemical energy from water, in excess or in equal proportion to the energy required to facilitate such production, would therefore violate the first or second law of thermodynamics.
I advise every poster interested in saving the planet (well this is what Biden says anyway) to watch the video where Water is used and separated into Hydrogen and Oxygen and burned like your current vehicle uses gasoline. There are people among us that do not want this video watched.
If the truth of your ignorance is an insult, educate yourself.
Seawater is not a source of hydrogen, not a source of energy.
We need energy to run the cars. Now it's mostly from fossil fuels, which
are a source of energy. They come out of the ground with useful energy
in them. There is no equivalent source of hydrogen. It is all chemically
bound and breaking those bonds takes energy.
Why do you want to use that energy to get hydrogen?
What is the gain you see from that hydrogen? Spell it out.
I advise every poster interested in saving the planet (well this is what Biden says anyway) to watch the video where Water is used and separated into Hydrogen and Oxygen and burned like your current vehicle uses gasoline. There are people among us that do not want this video watched.
If the video is somebody using energy to split water into hydrogen and oxygen and then using that hydrogen and oxygen to do work, I've seen them before.
If the truth of your ignorance is an insult, educate yourself.
Seawater is not a source of hydrogen, not a source of energy.
We need energy to run the cars. Now it's mostly from fossil fuels, which
are a source of energy. They come out of the ground with useful energy
in them. There is no equivalent source of hydrogen. It is all chemically
bound and breaking those bonds takes energy.
Why do you want to use that energy to get hydrogen?
What is the gain you see from that hydrogen? Spell it out.
First of all, there are decent ways to discuss and then there are those who are stunted so resort to insults.
You are fixated on seawater. Toyota is fixated on having a car with a tank filled with water that then is electronically separated into Hydrogen and Oxygen with the Hydrogen burned as a fuel. Really your argument is not with me, but is with Toyota and their engineers.
If the video is somebody using energy to split water into hydrogen and oxygen and then using that hydrogen and oxygen to do work, I've seen them before.
First of all, there are decent ways to discuss and then there are those who are stunted so resort to insults.
You are fixated on seawater. Toyota is fixated on having a car with a tank filled with water that then is electronically separated into Hydrogen and Oxygen with the Hydrogen burned as a fuel. Really your argument is not with me, but is with Toyota and their engineers.
First of all, there are decent ways to discuss and then there are those who are stunted so resort to insults.
You are fixated on seawater. Toyota is fixated on having a car with a tank filled with water that then is electronically separated into Hydrogen and Oxygen with the Hydrogen burned as a fuel. Really your argument is not with me, but is with Toyota and their engineers.
I advise every poster interested in saving the planet (well this is what Biden says anyway) to watch the video where Water is used and separated into Hydrogen and Oxygen and burned like your current vehicle uses gasoline. There are people among us that do not want this video watched.
They generate the electricity on the vehicle and use that energy to crack the water and if you truly are interested, watch the video and then try to e mail Toyota to see what they will tell you. They are the experts on this.
They generate the electricity on the vehicle and use that energy to crack the water and if you truly are interested, watch the video and then try to e mail Toyota to see what they will tell you. They are the experts on this.
Photocatalytic water splitting for green hydrogen production is hindered by the sluggish kinetics of oxygen evolution reaction (OER). Loading a co-catalyst is essential for accelerating the kinetics, but the detailed reaction mechanism and role of the co-catalyst are still obscure. Here, we...