A little test what people think in regard to the Renee Good business

[Darlo kittu]

The only thing that matters here:
Could a reasonable person, in the exact same setting as the ICE officer - that is, looking at the situation through their eyes - have a reasonable fear of death or bodily harm?
If the answer is yes, the shoot is good.

The shot was perfect

Scratch one social justice warrior

 

[Billiejeens]

The only thing that matters here:
Could a reasonable person, in the exact same setting as the ICE officer - that is, looking at the situation through their eyes - have a reasonable fear of death or bodily harm?
If the answer is yes, the shoot is good.

He was bodily harmed.

 

[Billiejeens]

Renee Good's Lesbian Partner Breaks Silence, Says ICE Harassment, Stalking Was to 'Support Our Neighbors'​

 

[M14 Shooter]

Issue settled.

 

[BackAgain]

Personally, I am sorry she died.

But, even so, if she hadn’t gone to interfere with the perfectly valid and proper work of the ICE agents, and if she hadn’t stopped her car on that street (perpendicular to the flow of traffic), she’d never have had occasion to strike the ICE agent with her vehicle.

She carries the blame almost exclusively — together with the idiot protestors being orchestrated by some insidious anti American operatives.

 

[Billiejeens]

Personally, I am sorry she died.

But, even so, if she hadn’t gone to interfere with the perfectly valid and proper work of the ICE agents, and if she hadn’t stopped her car on that street (perpendicular to the flow of traffic), she’d never have had occasion to strike the ICE agent with her vehicle.

She carries the blame almost exclusively — together with the idiot protestors being orchestrated by some insidious anti American operatives.

An inordinate number of the protestors are women.

Women are naturally nurturing creatures.
Normal women nurture their families.

Lesbian, Trans and Left Wing Indoctrinated women in general, have been brainwashed to exchange their family
for these strangers that they see as a valid replacement which is constantly reinforced within their culture.

They become true believers.
That's a problem.

 

[Darlo kittu]

They are fruit loops

 

[DigitalDrifter]

It was NOT reasonable for them or anyone else to harass and or hinder an ICE operation. P-E-R-I-O-D!!!

Doing so, shows us that you are against our immigration laws, i.e. a Dimocrat.

 

[kyzr]

I think these are fair questions. I've added a real good video that shows what happened, however, you're probably best served to turn the volume off, because their account of events are dishonest for the sake of left narrations - They practically explain why your eyes must suck (cough!). Add why with the answers if you care to.

1. It was reasonable for Renee and Rebecca to harass ICE. YES or NO

2. It was advisable for Renee and Rebecca to harass ICE. YES or NO

3. The car struck the agent as the women tried to escape detainment. CORRECT or INCORRECT

4. The fact Renee steered her tires to the right is important to demonstrate she didn't mean to. CORRECT or INCORRECT

5. Renee actually steered her tires to the right after striking the agent. CORRECT or INCORRECT

6. The agent can't see the tires anyhow -He only knows he was struck dead-nuts by a woman trying to escape detainment. CORRECT or INCORRECT

7. The primary reason the agent escaped injury was of her doing, because she steered to the right. CORRECT or INCORRECT

8. The primary reason the agent escaped injury was of his doing, doesn't matter whether or not trained to not stand in front of a vehicle. CORRECT or INCORRECT

9 The agent is justified to have shot her by the books, as Renee put him in immediate danger. CORRECT or INCORRECT

10. Renee was justified being there. CORRECT or INCORRECT

11. The Agent was justified being there. CORRECT or INCORRECT

12. People like Renee are primarily provoked by REPUBLICANS or DEMOCRATS?

13 People like Renee put people in danger. CORRECT or INCORRECT

14. People like the Agent put people in danger. CORRECT or INCORRECT

15. Is Renee a hero on some level, or just a travesty? HERO TRAVISTY

16. Word is Rebecca accepts blame and remorse for getting Renee involved, and capped GoFundme at 1.5 M. These are gestures of good character. CORRECT or INCORRECT

17. Minneapolis is a real fkd up city these days. CORRECT or INCORRECT

18. The reason these protests didn't occur under the Obama Administration is because? WHY?

19. Deportations, immigration control, and police/military protection are necessary. CORRECT or INCORRECT

20. The Agent began firing as he was struck by the car. CORRECT or INCORRECT

21. Law enforcement must snap decisions in fractions of a second when confronted by danger. CORRECT or INCORRECT

22. Renee simply fucked up, and her disregard for the Agent's life apparent. CORRECT or INCORRECT

23. Protesters of the day stand behind their rights to provoke and test others, in the name of group concern for those rights. It's complicated and twisted. CORRECT or INCORRECT

24. Problem is Trump is what the left make him out to be. CORRECT or INCORRECT

There is a "Poll tab" to do polls, use it.

 

[kyzr]

Again Saint Renee brought this on herself. ICE did not follow her. She was out looking for ICE
She refused to comply with their orders. Her gal pal told her to drive off
She pointed her 4000.pd weapon at a law enforcement officer
She got shot. Why is that a shock to anyone?

Look what law Tampon signed in 2020:

Well, well, well, look what Tim Walz signed into law in 2020... - Revolver News

Looks like Tampon Tim saved the day.

revolver.news

Well, well, well…Look what Tim Walz signed into law in 2020:MN law §609.066: Officers can use deadly force if a driver accelerates toward them, creating immediate life-threatening danger. No need to wait for impact—they can act based on apparent intent & proximity.

 

[IM2]

I think these are fair questions. I've added a real good video that shows what happened, however, you're probably best served to turn the volume off, because their account of events are dishonest for the sake of left narrations - They practically explain why your eyes must suck (cough!). Add why with the answers if you care to.

1. It was reasonable for Renee and Rebecca to harass ICE. YES or NO

2. It was advisable for Renee and Rebecca to harass ICE. YES or NO

3. The car struck the agent as the women tried to escape detainment. CORRECT or INCORRECT

4. The fact Renee steered her tires to the right is important to demonstrate she didn't mean to. CORRECT or INCORRECT

5. Renee actually steered her tires to the right after striking the agent. CORRECT or INCORRECT

6. The agent can't see the tires anyhow -He only knows he was struck dead-nuts by a woman trying to escape detainment. CORRECT or INCORRECT

7. The primary reason the agent escaped injury was of her doing, because she steered to the right. CORRECT or INCORRECT

8. The primary reason the agent escaped injury was of his doing, doesn't matter whether or not trained to not stand in front of a vehicle. CORRECT or INCORRECT

9 The agent is justified to have shot her by the books, as Renee put him in immediate danger. CORRECT or INCORRECT

10. Renee was justified being there. CORRECT or INCORRECT

11. The Agent was justified being there. CORRECT or INCORRECT

12. People like Renee are primarily provoked by REPUBLICANS or DEMOCRATS?

13 People like Renee put people in danger. CORRECT or INCORRECT

14. People like the Agent put people in danger. CORRECT or INCORRECT

15. Is Renee a hero on some level, or just a travesty? HERO TRAVISTY

16. Word is Rebecca accepts blame and remorse for getting Renee involved, and capped GoFundme at 1.5 M. These are gestures of good character. CORRECT or INCORRECT

17. Minneapolis is a real fkd up city these days. CORRECT or INCORRECT

18. The reason these protests didn't occur under the Obama Administration is because? WHY?

19. Deportations, immigration control, and police/military protection are necessary. CORRECT or INCORRECT

20. The Agent began firing as he was struck by the car. CORRECT or INCORRECT

21. Law enforcement must snap decisions in fractions of a second when confronted by danger. CORRECT or INCORRECT

22. Renee simply fucked up, and her disregard for the Agent's life apparent. CORRECT or INCORRECT

23. Protesters of the day stand behind their rights to provoke and test others, in the name of group concern for those rights. It's complicated and twisted. CORRECT or INCORRECT

24. Problem is Trump is what the left make him out to be. CORRECT or INCORRECT

https://www.cnn.com/2026/01/09/us/video/ice-agents-cellphone-footage-raises-new-questions-invs

Take your questions and shove them up your MAGAT ---. ICE had no business being sent to that city. ICE is there in violation of the Constitution. This was murdered by the government. Period.

 

[IM2]

Revolver.News – Bias and Credibility​

Detailed Report​

Questionable Reasoning: Poor Sourcing, Lack of Transparency, Conspiracy Theories
Bias Rating: RIGHT (7.9)
Factual Reporting: MIXED (6.4)
Country: Unknown
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

• Overall, we rate Revolver.News right biased and Questionable based on poor sourcing techniques and a complete lack of transparency.

Revolver.News - Bias and Credibility

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no

mediabiasfactcheck.com

 

[Darlo kittu]

Take your questions and shove them up your MAGAT ---. ICE had no business being sent to that city. ICE is there in violation of the Constitution. This was murdered by the government. Period.

No business?.

So no illegals in your city?

Listen up tough guy if your mucking Democrats wiukd allow the local Police to work with ICE they could pick up the illegals at the jail

Now until someone dies and you are made boss ICE will continue to enforce existing immigration laws

 

[22lcidw]

Take your questions and shove them up your MAGAT ---. ICE had no business being sent to that city. ICE is there in violation of the Constitution. This was murdered by the government. Period.

Prog Socialist Communist fatigue.

 

[IDIOCRACY]

Take your questions and shove them up your MAGAT ---. ICE had no business being sent to that city. ICE is there in violation of the Constitution. This was murdered by the government. Period.

You could have just admitted Renee fucked up. Govt. murder, neat, serves your taste for victimization well.

 

[IDIOCRACY]

I say that you stating that parking her car there was deliberate is pure misinformation.

I understand that is what Trump and his people want you to believe but I don't belive that is correct.

In looking at the video, her tires were pointed West, suggesting she was trying to cross the street going in the opposite direction of the ICE procession direction but she could not cross because they were upon her

View attachment 1205986

here is what AI says

AI Overview

There is significant disagreement between federal authorities and local officials/eyewitnesses regarding whether Renee Good intentionally used her car to block or attack the ICE agents.

Federal Officials' Account

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and other federal officials have stated that Good intentionally blocked the road and "weaponized her vehicle" to conduct an act of violence against the agents.

• Federal officials claim Good had been harassing law enforcement vehicles earlier in the day and intentionally returned to the scene to impede the operation by parking her car diagonally across the public roadway as a barrier.
• They describe her actions as "domestic terrorism" and assert the agent who shot her acted in self-defense, fearing for his life when the car moved toward him.

Local Officials' and Eyewitness Account

Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey, local officials, and eyewitnesses strongly dispute the federal claims.

• Video analysis by local officials and some news organizations suggests Good was attempting to leave the scene or maneuver away from the agents when she was shot, not trying to run them over.
• Eyewitnesses have stated that she stopped to let an unmarked ICE vehicle pass, and the agents then got out of their vehicle and approached her, escalating the situation.
• They argue the agent acted recklessly and that the use of lethal force was not justified.

In essence, federal authorities claim the blocking was intentional interference, while local accounts and video analysis suggest she was trying to leave or inadvertently stopped in the road due to the situation, making her car placement a point of significant contention in the ongoing investigation.

1. I don't know what your first sentence means.

2. You said the car never struck the agent, why would that be considering beginning at 2:30 in the video, the agent is struck by the car?

3. 2:37 shows she turned her wheels to the right after she'd already struck the agent you claim never happened. It doesn't matter she steered to the right anyway, after all, she struck the agent, whether before, during or after striking the agent.

4. AI huh? That's the best you got I guess to defend your position. Anyone who is an expert on subjects and checks AI knows AI is OFTEN wrong. Need proof?

Here's the video for your convenience. https://www.cnn.com/2026/01/09/us/video/ice-agents-cellphone-footage-raises-new-questions-invs

 

[toobfreak]

here is what AI says

**** you and your AI. For the 99th time, where her tire was pointing before the event, her intentions, blah, blah, blah, none of this crap matters. All that matters are the facts of the law, jackass:

1. She and others had been following, provoking, interferring in LE operations for hours if not days.
2. ICE has endured an unprecedented increase in threats, harassment and violent behavior for months leading to elevated tension.
3. The officer in question had himself just been injured and dragged by a car just a few months ago resulting in his needing 33 stitches.
4. The WHOLE POINT in these trained, idiotic anti-ICE squads is to PROVOKE a confrontation and FORCE a conflict.
5. The officer crossed over to support the other officer at her door.
6. She stepped on the gas when the law requires you to shut off your engine, peeling out on the slippery surface.
7. At the time she started moving, even though she WAS cutting her wheels around to the right, at that time, they were actually pointed forward, so when the car started moving, it came straight at the officer.
8. She didn't have room to drive out of there anyway without hitting the guy even with him jumping back out of her way.
9. No reasonable officer would have not fired as officers are trained to do, not thought that she /could/ be intending to hit and hurt him, and officers only have a split second to react, not a week to study 30 videos from 19 angles.
10. The law always gives a wide deference to the officer and will only rule against him in the most overt, egregious abuses of police policy, a good reason to not provoke them.
11. These will be the official findings of the review board who will clear him of all wrongdoing as a result with maybe a small slap on the wrist.

THAT is why you don't **** with cops. They are ARMED, TRAINED, and prepared to SHOOT YOUR ******* ASS if they decide you are a danger to them or anyone else. People are playing with dynamite doing this crap. Let them do their jobs just as they always have.

BTW, do you know Obumma deported 4 million illegals in one year, more than Trump. And they were deported in exactly the same manner. You are being PLAYED by the democrats and media all for a midterm election. Good died for nothing, a senseless waste of human life.

LIVE IT. LEARN IT. LOVE IT. REMEMBER IT.

 

[IDIOCRACY]

Just remember people, next time you're struck by the front of a car, be sure to check where the tires are turned beforehand.

We'll disregard she steered right after he was struck or at best when he was struck. The fact she steered to the right means something, somehow, cuz lib democrats are cracked.

 

[DonGlock26]

The Left's narrative isn't working.

 

[Luckyone]

1. I don't know what your first sentence means.

No one knows why she was parked there. She is dead and cannot answer the question

2. You said the car never struck the agent, why would that be considering beginning at 2:30 in the video, the agent is struck by the car?

There is no visual proof she hit him

3. 2:37 shows she turned her wheels to the right after she'd already struck the agent you claim never happened. It doesn't matter she steered to the right anyway, after all, she struck the agent, whether before, during or after striking the agent.

I have seen the video more than 10 times and at no time was the car targeting the agent

4. AI huh? That's the best you got I guess to defend your position. Anyone who is an expert on subjects and checks AI knows AI is OFTEN wrong. Need proof

My eyes are all the proof that I need. You cannot prove your point

Here's the video for your convenience. https://www.cnn.com/2026/01/09/us/video/ice-agents-cellphone-footage-raises-new-questions-invs