I would love to hear the tape. Wouldn't you?

If it were destroyed, how did journalists hear it?

This is what I mean about defying logic.

AI is not evidence. AI believes what it reads on the internet.

Show me any evidence of such a tape.

Show me the confirmation that "AI" says exists.
You say journalists heard it but you want me to furnish evidence of it's existence? That is what I mean about defying logic. As is the case with the Epstein files, why doesn't the regime just release the files of the Homan investigation. Unless they destroyed the file too.
 
You say journalists heard it but you want me to furnish evidence of it's existence?
I didn't say journalists heard it. I asked how you could claim journalists heard it and also that it was destroyed.

Was it like the tapes in the old "Mission Impossible" series that would self-destruct after one hearing?

Or do you now admit that no journalists heard any such tapes?
That is what I mean about defying logic. As is the case with the Epstein files, why doesn't the regime just release the files of the Homan investigation. Unless they destroyed the file too.
Same answer for both: Because the DOJ has long had an ethical stricture against releasing information about an investigation that led to no indictment. That's even if there ever was such an investigation. There is no evidence of an investigation of Homan - none. Just second hand reporting of supposed anonymous sources.
 
Seriously doubt there was anything incriminating on a recording. There is a reason these are mostly never released.

The second person involved was a snitch. That is generally the meat of the prosecution.

The FBI even admits their use of informants is dubious right on their own site. They say,

"...use of informants to assist in the investigation of criminal activity may involve an element of deception, intrusion into the privacy of individuals, or cooperation with persons whose reliability and motivation may be open to question."

Edit: Message won't post with my source, but you can do an internet search on the quote. It's from the FBI's own site
 
Seriously doubt there was anything incriminating on a recording. There is a reason these are mostly never released.

The second person involved was a snitch. That is generally the meat of the prosecution.

The FBI even admits their use of informants is dubious right on their own site. They say,

"...use of informants to assist in the investigation of criminal activity may involve an element of deception, intrusion into the privacy of individuals, or cooperation with persons whose reliability and motivation may be open to question."

Edit: Message won't post with my source, but you can do an internet search on the quote. It's from the FBI's own site
Maybe that is what Tom meant when he said he had broken no laws. He thought he had been the victim of entrapment. Cuz he didn't say in a Faux interview he didn't take the money.
 
Homan wasn't a Homeland Security employee at the time.
That's a defense............."I took the bribe before I was named border czar"...........I think most Americans, those not in trump's cult, would find unpersuasive.
 
Another silly hoax blew up in the dembots face
The Wylie Coyote effect.

wile-coyote.gif
 
That's a defense............."I took the bribe before I was named border czar"...........I think most Americans, those not in trump's cult, would find unpersuasive.
What we the bride?
 

"I would love to hear the tape. Wouldn't you?"​


I'm not sure about the partisan rhetoric in the OP, just b/c you don't like someone doesn't automatically mean they are guilty.

But I am always in favor of more information, that can only be good for a representative republic.



However, intelligent folks know that in this era, high government officials don't face any legal consequences for corruption, we see it all over these days.

No reason to keep the evidence under wraps if there will be no prosecution, sure, let's see it.



Homan to Newsmax: 'Did Nothing Illegal,' Bribe Claims a 'Hit Piece'​



". . . FBI Director Kash Patel and Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche said in a statement to the Hill Saturday that “this matter originated under the previous administration and was subjected to a full review by FBI agents and Justice Department prosecutors. They found no credible evidence of any criminal wrongdoing.”

Homan himself called the allegations “bullsh-t.”
 

"I would love to hear the tape. Wouldn't you?"​


I'm not sure about the partisan rhetoric in the OP, just b/c you don't like someone doesn't automatically mean they are guilty.

But I am always in favor of more information, that can only be good for a representative republic.



However, intelligent folks know that in this era, high government officials don't face any legal consequences for corruption, we see it all over these days.

No reason to keep the evidence under wraps if there will be no prosecution, sure, let's see it.



Homan to Newsmax: 'Did Nothing Illegal,' Bribe Claims a 'Hit Piece'​



". . . FBI Director Kash Patel and Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche said in a statement to the Hill Saturday that “this matter originated under the previous administration and was subjected to a full review by FBI agents and Justice Department prosecutors. They found no credible evidence of any criminal wrongdoing.”

Homan himself called the allegations “bullsh-t.”
Your post here shows logic, and fact, which is why none from the left, especially Berg80 will accept it...
 

"I would love to hear the tape. Wouldn't you?"​


I'm not sure about the partisan rhetoric in the OP, just b/c you don't like someone doesn't automatically mean they are guilty.

But I am always in favor of more information, that can only be good for a representative republic.



However, intelligent folks know that in this era, high government officials don't face any legal consequences for corruption, we see it all over these days.

No reason to keep the evidence under wraps if there will be no prosecution, sure, let's see it.



Homan to Newsmax: 'Did Nothing Illegal,' Bribe Claims a 'Hit Piece'​



". . . FBI Director Kash Patel and Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche said in a statement to the Hill Saturday that “this matter originated under the previous administration and was subjected to a full review by FBI agents and Justice Department prosecutors. They found no credible evidence of any criminal wrongdoing.”

Homan himself called the allegations “bullsh-t.”
Sounds like a failed attempting the xiden admin to start yet another hoax
 
15th post
No, not the same. Congress takes donations to their regulated campaign funds.

What Homan took was a personal bribe to his own personal funds.
What was the bride for?
 
The election had not happened yet.
Wow, you are one impressive person. Legal experts suggest Homan could have faced charges for conspiracy or fraud. No wonder trump's DoJ put a halt to the investigation.
 
No, not the same. Congress takes donations to their regulated campaign funds.

What Homan took was a personal bribe to his own personal funds.

You of course know that in the real world none of this actually happened.

But you keep repeating the narrative.
You do you.
 
You of course know that in the real world none of this actually happened.

But you keep repeating the narrative.
You do you.
Democrats have no solutions all they have is fake personal attacks
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom