I would love to hear the tape. Wouldn't you?

The obvious solution would have been for trump not to appoint Homan to fill a position in the government since he was under investigation for taking a bribe.
One would imagine if there was anything to it, it would have been aired during his confirmation Berg.....it was a rather hostile event......~S~
 
One would imagine if there was anything to it, it would have been aired during his confirmation Berg.....it was a rather hostile event......~S~

Yet another piece of evidence the Democrats are hiding to protect Republicans. Along with the Epstein files, the Trump pee tape, and the Russian collusion information. :rolleyes:
 
One would imagine if there was anything to it, it would have been aired during his confirmation Berg.....it was a rather hostile event......~S~
Wow. Conspiracy theory buzz kill.
 
One would imagine if there was anything to it, it would have been aired during his confirmation Berg.....it was a rather hostile event......~S~
Why would you imagine that?
 
Apparently these guys never heard of Abscam.
I thought The Following's belief in infallibility only extended to trump. Apparently, it covers everyone in the regime. Therefore, if a member was caught committing a crime it must be someone else's fault, like the FBI's.
 
15th post
I thought The Following's belief in infallibility only extended to trump. Apparently, it covers everyone in the regime. Therefore, if a member was caught committing a crime it must be someone else's fault, like the FBI's.
What crime was committed?
 
Why would you imagine that?
Obviously the D's did not want Trump's appointee Marener .......as he was appointed after the 'investigation' i'm sure they would have used any 'evidence' against him at that time

They didn't even bring it up......

~S~
 
Democratic senators asked Bondi what happened to the money and she didn’t know. Seems like it’s the Trump administration that lost the money.
She told the senator who asked about it to speak with Ka$h Patel. As though, as AG, she wasn't in the loop of DoJ officials who were being kept up to date on the investigation.
 
Obviously the D's did not want Trump's appointee Marener .......as he was appointed after the 'investigation' i'm sure they would have used any 'evidence' against him at that time

They didn't even bring it up......

~S~
They didn’t know about it. How could they bring up an investigation that they didn’t know about?
 
Back
Top Bottom