Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So the only relevant evidence is his testimony?The Pentagon didn't know shit in 2010 - mainly because it didn't have Bergdahl's input.
No.
Why do you hate soldiers? Isn't Bergdahl innocent or at least given the benefit of doubt until proven otherwise? Why your big rush to judgement?
Well, we have one Texan's word for what happened, for what that's worth.My apologies, Lakhota. I forgot to post the link. I've edited the OP.Geezus H. Kryst, at least wait for the final mental/physical examinations/evaluations before rending your G.I. Joe bullshit analysis. I also have serious doubts that you were there...
Again, I'm sorry.
You support Obama releasing those bastards?
Not at all surprising, really.
Yes, I support releasing them because people with much better information than you and I have access to made the decision based on various criteria that we don't know.
you just blindly trust the people that made that decision because you have been conditioned believe everything the government says when the government is operated by people who hold your views
every guy who actually was there may have an opinion that you would call partisan.....so are their opinions worthless too?....Here's what I got from the article - he wasn't "there"
he was near there. as a contractor - or as i like to call them, a piece of shit mercenary.
and he doesn't offer any new insight or evidence, he just offers his two cents based on the exact same information that everyone else has.
so why is his obviously partisan opinion worth anything again?
Opinions are like assholes - everybody has one. You're entitled to yours...
You support Obama releasing those bastards?
Not at all surprising, really.
Yes, I support releasing them because people with much better information than you and I have access to made the decision based on various criteria that we don't know.
Here's what I got from the article - he wasn't "there"
he was near there. as a contractor - or as i like to call them, a piece of shit mercenary.
and he doesn't offer any new insight or evidence, he just offers his two cents based on the exact same information that everyone else has.
so why is his obviously partisan opinion worth anything again?
Yes, I support releasing them because people with much better information than you and I have access to made the decision based on various criteria that we don't know.
you just blindly trust the people that made that decision because you have been conditioned believe everything the government says when the government is operated by people who hold your views
I cautiously trust those people until I learn otherwise. Journalists are pursuing the truth. I cautiously trusted Bush - until I learned he was lying.
I can understand why he felt ashamed to be an American. He was fighting a bogus war.
I can understand why he felt ashamed to be an American. He was fighting a bogus war.
How was the war in Afghanistan bogus?
You didn't need to be there.
every guy who actually was there may have an opinion that you would call partisan.....so are their opinions worthless too?....Here's what I got from the article - he wasn't "there"
he was near there. as a contractor - or as i like to call them, a piece of shit mercenary.
and he doesn't offer any new insight or evidence, he just offers his two cents based on the exact same information that everyone else has.
so why is his obviously partisan opinion worth anything again?
Bergdahl so far as we know was not dealing with anything that the other solider's he was serving with were dealing with and they didn't walk off there post Bergdahl may not be a villain but neither is he a hero and this administration should have and it seems like did know this before portraying him as one.
with the exception of one person saying once that he served with honor and distinction what gives you the impression anyone is calling him a hero?
I can understand why he felt ashamed to be an American. He was fighting a bogus war.
How was the war in Afghanistan bogus?
You didn't need to be there.
Letting bin Laden escape so you can ramp up a War On Terror makes it bogus.I can understand why he felt ashamed to be an American. He was fighting a bogus war.
How was the war in Afghanistan bogus?
Should he have come out and said we got back a piece of shit American deserter soldier instead, for the whole world, including enemies to hear?with the exception of one person saying once that he served with honor and distinction what gives you the impression anyone is calling him a hero?
That they had gotten back a solider who had heroically survived five years in Taliban captivity sure seemed to be the line the administration was pushing until the questions about how he left the base and was captured started being asked.