Then don't. Problem solved. Please don't tell me that their fate rests on your shoulders. It seems you have an over-inflated sense of self worth.
I no longer support Roe v Wade
- Thread starter rightwinger
- Start date
Yes, RW has a propensity for acting like a dumbass. He takes wildly stupid positions, such as this, and then tries and make a joke about it. He is a true deplorable. Especially when the trumpster has a long history of being pro choice. Here is a quote from 1999...
"Historically, Trump's opinion on abortion and women's right to choose has been conflicted and subject to change. During a 1999 appearance on Meet the Press, for example, Trump said, "I’m very pro-choice. I hate the concept of abortion. I hate it. I hate everything it stands for. But … I just believe in choice." By 2011, when he was considering a run for the presidency, however, Trump was saying he was pro-life. "Let me put it this way," he told The New York Times, "I am pro life, and pro-life people will find out that I will be very loyal to them, just as I am loyal to other people. I would be appointing judges that feel the way I feel."
FALSE: Donald Trump Removed 'Pro-Life' from His Policies 12 Hours After Election
emilynghiem
Constitutionalist / Universalist
The laws of nature are such that at the moment space and time came into existence, beings that know and create were pre-destined to arise by the laws of nature. Here is the proof you have been looking for. The reality is that the Bible correctly explains that the universe had a beginning and was created in steps. Science tells us that the universe did have a beginning and what we see today is a result of the evolution of matter and was a process that was done in steps. Subatomic particles evolved into hydrogen and helium. Hydrogen and helium formed cosmic structures. Supernovas created the other elements. Chemical evolution created all the compounds. Life mad the leap from inorganic matter to organic matter. Life made the leap from single cells to multi cells and to eventually beings that know and create. The laws of nature came into existence at the time space and time were created. Those laws predestined that beings that know and create would eventually arise. Check mate.Maybe you will find out one day, but I'd like to thank you for proving one of my points.That's between her and God, not me. But if I were her, I would risk my life for my child.What do you recommend if a woman is going to die unless if she has an abortion..
What is your solution?
Maybe not have as many horndog republicans....?
God?, who's that?
Their religion is socialism which worships big government and social policy. It is based on atheism and deification of man. It proceeds in almost all its manifestations from the assumption that the basic principles guiding the life of an individual and of mankind in general do not go beyond the satisfaction of material needs or primitive instincts. They have no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure. Their doctrine is abolition of private property, abolition of family, abolition of religion and communality or equality. The religious nature of socialism explains the extraordinary attraction to socialist doctrines and its capacity to inflame individuals and inspire popular movements and condemn respect for any who believe in Christianity. They practice moral relativity, indiscriminate indiscriminateness, multiculturalism, cultural marxism and normalization of deviance. Their hostility towards traditional religions is that of an animosity between a rival religion. They can be identified by an external locus of control. They worship science but are the first to argue against it. They are modern American liberals.
God. Prove the existence of God, with a logical argument.
Dear ding
Again we'd have to AGREE that the laws of nature equate to what is meant by God or God's will and laws.
What stands in the way of agreement is unforgiveness or fear of outside motives trying to control the narrative.
So the proof of agreement on God is actually conducted backwards.
first the conclusion is stated up front, like a contrapositive proof.
then all the objections to the statement are
address and resolved one by one, until
people either tie or reach agreement.
that's how we prove it, to ourselves by
process of eliminating all sources of conflict or counterargument.
You haven't finished the proof, you only started it by
stating the assumption at the beginning.
the real proof is in the process of reconciling afterwards.
until consensus is reached.
And that, dear ding, requires just as much change on your side of the equation
with your perception of people and relations in life
as it does the person you are trying to prove something to!
it requires mutual change in order to grow toward understanding from both sides perspectives.
good luck and good going to take this on!
you will succeed beautifully and will likely get more out of
the process than you might have envisioned.
Thank you for sharing, and more power to ya!!
With Love and Respect,
Yours truly,
Emily
Lakhota
Diamond Member
Your reverse psychology is interesting.
EvilCat Breath
Diamond Member
- Sep 23, 2016
- 94,905
- 70,944
- 3,645
None of those are constitutional issues.
emilynghiem
Constitutionalist / Universalist
Dear rightwinger
there is a difference between caring and feeling powerless to change things.
people who kill themselves care deeply, but many feel so distraught and overwhelmed
by oppression or pain, they compromise or give up when they feel they have no choice
and can't change the situation or do anything about it.
I can't change if Trump sticks his foot in his mouth and insults
or assaults people beyond anything that can be justified.
I can just make sure ***I*** don't do that, or if I do abuse or harass
someone I apologize for taking it too far.
I think you must be playing a game of devils advocate or reverse psychology
rightwinger
Whatever this is, it may prove effective for inspiring deep thought and discussion.
So thanks for that, rightie!
I like this better than just posts that don't invite response but impose like hit and run.
This approach is at least engaging, good job using this angle!
Quite effective
I hope you arrive at a better conclusion than what you started with.
rightwinger
Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster
- Aug 4, 2009
- 308,087
- 262,001
- 3,615
- Thread starter
- #89
It is realism
A majority of American women do not care about reproductive rights, equal pay or respect
Unkotare
Diamond Member
- Aug 16, 2011
- 145,542
- 32,636
- 2,180
EvilCat Breath
Diamond Member
- Sep 23, 2016
- 94,905
- 70,944
- 3,645
Murdering infants is the worst kind of crime. Selling the infant body parts is ghoulish.
On the other hand, the children being killed are the children of minorities and liberals. There is no reason for me to want these numbers increased.
On the other hand, the children being killed are the children of minorities and liberals. There is no reason for me to want these numbers increased.
Wow, you are delusional. You are literally having to construct an alternate reality to justify the defeat of your socialist policies. A much much simpler explanation is that Hillary was a horrible candidate and the midwestern states determined that the policies of the last 8 years was not in their best interest.
Divine Wind
Platinum Member
No worries. Left Wingers are well known to flip-flop more times than a beached fish and bigger liars than a fisherman.
Last edited:
emilynghiem
Constitutionalist / Universalist
Yes Tipsycatlover it not only involves constitutional issues but BELIEFS about constitutional
authority or limits of govt
Where people have a belief or political creed about right to life, right to health care,
free choice, or states rights,
it has come into conflict making public policy
where SOME people believe the Supreme Court is overreaching and crossing into state matters,
and others believe the opposite that the point is to prevent overreaching of religion into govt.
The two beliefs are clashing over how much authority the Courts have.
So that is a constitutional issue, to the point we may need an amendment clarification
or agreement on political beliefs and creeds to address it!
But if you and your socialist buddies want to believe that lie, good for you because that means you will not have learned a damn thing from this defeat and you will keep doing the same damn thing and expect a different result.
If only you could have made these women understand that they don't care about reproductive rights, equal pay or respect, then the election would have turned out better, right?
Lakhota
Diamond Member
Well, I must admit that many women don't seem to fight very hard for their rights. Maybe they just feel safer in a male-dominated society and are too afraid to rock the boat. There's a word for that: cowardice.
Sun Devil 92
Diamond Member
- Apr 2, 2015
- 32,078
- 11,114
- 1,410
- Banned
- #98
It is already happening. Ever since the decision, there have been groups quietly working to hem it in and they have done a pretty good job. None of their work is challenged because the left fears it might result in the overt negation of Roe v. Wade.
Sun Devil 92
Diamond Member
- Apr 2, 2015
- 32,078
- 11,114
- 1,410
- Banned
- #99
So you look at something and say...it seems.
Then you say....well, maybe.....
Then you say that is cowardice.
You debate so well.
rightwinger
Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster
- Aug 4, 2009
- 308,087
- 262,001
- 3,615
- Thread starter
- #100
Similar threads
