- Jan 8, 2011
- 66,077
- 35,136
- 2,605
I would much prefer eliminating our federal government entirely but since I can’t, I want it to work for all Americans not just the wealthy.Wow.Yes. Bernie just might have beat Donnie. It’s that lesser of two evils thing.Are you saying that this country was ready for a socialist/communist president in 2016?Bernie would have won in 2016 but thanks to corrupt D party leadership and their colluding friends in the MSM, a well known corporatist crook got the nomination. She was so bad Bernie voters ignored her and she lost to a reality show conman. LOL!
The D Party has learned nothing. They want another corporatist to get the nomination, to appease their billionaire donors. The people be damned.
I don't think so.
At any rate, I think many Americans are feed up with our system of protecting and enriching the extreme wealthy, while doing little for average Americans. The .1% buy the politicians with their enormous wealth. Bernie was and is the only politician who promotes policies that help average Americans, he is strongly anti war, and not owned by the billionaires or MIC.
Our system does not protect and enrich the extremely wealthy, Comrade G, but rather protects everyone's right to pursue their own best interests and/or live their lives as they see fit. And Bernie doesn't promote policies that help average Americans but rather he promotes big central gov't policies that would enslave us in socialist shackles. Our constitutional rights & protections are intended to allow equal op to succeed (or fail) on merit ... not impose equal outcomes.
And you call yourself a libertarian? You really need to look up the meaning of the word. You post like a bitter Marxist who wants more gov't control.
Your post is terribly naive. The billionaires have enormous political power. You and I have none.
If you don’t think Medicare for all won’t benefit millions of Americans, you are listening to too much Rush. Watch as a Fox News audience loves Bernie’s HC plan.