I like Presidents who dont get FBI raids or plead the 5th

if anyone is a fool that would be you ... here you believe that trump is telling you the truth ???? a guy that's never told the truth in his life ... you are trying to convince us you're not the fool ... he lied about the votes being stolen that was a lie ... here Hillary in 2016 had James Comey go after her two weeks before the election ... causing dought to the voters for her... causing her to lose the election ... you guys were fine with that on the right ...that they did that a week before the election... James Comey finally said there was no crime ... now you think trump is not guilty of taking classified documents ...
What I think and what you make up in your mind are two different things…
 
if anyone is a fool that would be you ... here you believe that trump is telling you the truth ???? a guy that's never told the truth in his life ... you are trying to convince us you're not the fool ... he lied about the votes being stolen that was a lie ... here Hillary in 2016 had James Comey go after her two weeks before the election ... causing dought to the voters for her... causing her to lose the election ... you guys were fine with that on the right ...that they did that a week before the election... James Comey finally said there was no crime ... now you think trump is not guilty of taking classified documents ...
/----/ "a guy that's never told the truth in his life "
Thanks for the hysterical wild-eyed hyperbole. We might take you seriously if you held Banana Republic Joe to the same standard. But, we all know you won't. BTW, the inflation reduction bill will raise taxes on people making as little as $10,000 a year, even though Joe promised no one making less than $400,000 would pay more taxes.
 
I like congresses that don't put innocent people through endless frivolous investigations that produce NOTHING. In 2022, for the first time in my life, I am voting a strict Republican party line and in 2024, it will be either Trump or DeSantis. I've had enough of democrat shenanigans for life and this is coming from a 50+ year democrat. They have been taken over by globalists. They are not Americans.

Desantis has no regard for the US constitution either. He won't even uphold the Florida constitution. Be careful what you wish for.
 
Trump didn’t have to have his home raided. That was a sordid choice made by vile and probably corrupt politicians. And he wouldn’t need to take the 5th if he wasn’t a target of corrupt government officialdom.

The senile old racist hasn’t been asked to testify about his and Hunter’s criminal behavior YET.


So? You have shitty taste in politicians.

Taking documents that belong to the National Archives is a problem. Why do you think Trump did that?
 
A US President has NEVER had their home raided in US history...

....and instead of blaming the proven criminal, treasonous pitically partisan FBI that has been proven to have violated Constitution and law, tge FBI that violated the Patriot Act, defrauded the FISA Court, participated in a failed coup, and just perpetrated the 1st-ever raid on a US President...

....you want to blame Trump?


Bwuhahahahahahaha

Trump has had a lot of firsts... like two impeachments, a soft porn first lady..
 
Taking documents that belong to the National Archives is a problem. Why do you think Trump did that?
/----/ Ask Obama, he'd probably give you the same answer. Obama took 30 million pages of documents from the White House. His office has yet to digitize them, despite promises to the National Archives. The FBI never investigated Obama nor raided his home or office.
 
Of course he is to blame. He should have just given the stuff back.
He should quit lying about how the search warrant was carried out. He knows there are witnesses, including one of his lawyer and security cameras are in place.
He has a copy of the search warrant. He could tell the American people exactly what they were looking for, but has not. It is not because he doesn't know.
He has a copy of the inventory of what was taken with them. He could share that with the American people. It is not because he doesn't know.
He is just a lying cocksucker, hamming it up for confusion, entertainment and sucking in donations, while poorly playing the victim.
He hasn't told any of the MAGA nut-balls, that he knows all that, has he?
He is a modern PT Barnum, in that he knows, There is a sucker born, ever minute.
Maybe he planned to sell the documents to Russia.
 
Taking documents that belong to the National Archives is a problem. Why do you think Trump did that?
That’s really a good question. It’s pretty clear he did. I have a hard time believing he wanted to sell nuclear secrets for money. That seems too outlandish. Before someone said nuclear I’d have assumed it was embarrassing stuff.
 
From Reddit (has to be accurate):

Basically - trump took 50 boxes from the White House - against his lawyer's advice.

The National Archives discovered this. So they went down to Florida and asked for the 50 boxes back. Trump gave them half of the boxes and pretended that was 100% of it.

Then trump started Selling the Top Secret documents to China, and Saudi Arabia. Russia already knows all that shit.

Mark Meadows was the National Archives Officer for the White House; it's his legal duty to retain Presidential documents - so Mark Meadows is also on the hook for the documents.

Mark Meadows likely testified to a Federal Grand Jury. Meadows is either the informant or a coconspirator. But more likely just a witness.

The grand jury requested the search warrant.

The informant was a witness to the safe, in particular and the boxes of documents in general. The informant could be Meadows, Kushner, or a random Secret Service Agent or a staffer we don't know about- like how Cassidy Hutchinson was.

So now - they have recovered the other half of the boxes - but they are missing the controlled documents that Trump Sold. But they know what's supposed to be in there. They know what's missing. And they know who Trump met with at his golf course and by his security cameras. And they got him red handed.

That's what's up.

They moved on him like a bitch because this is an espionage product investigation.

Like - the golf ⛳️ tournament- lol. Ok? They sold tickets for 1 dollar. There was 500 fans in attendance. And the endorsement deals were hundreds of millions of dollars?

That's not a business model. That's a money laundering scheme for nuclear weapons.
 
I like my presidents to be people who dont have to get their homes searched by law enforcement and dont need to plead the 5th in court . Biden is ok for now. For 2024, Im kinda liking either Liz Warren or Mayor Pete
You can keep Lizzie and Petey but... yeah... I like Presidents who DON"T get "captured" ( in a tangled web of lies and lawlessness and subpoenas and search warrants )...

I like Presidents to whom it would never occur to corruptly and arrogantly declare that they could shoot someone in the middle of Fifth Avenue and get away with it...

I like Winners... not Losers ( like the failed Orange Baboon-God )...
 
Last edited:
Trump did say that if you are innocent then you don't need to plead the fifth.
/-----/ No one disputes that. He did say it before he was president and a target of the left's legal attack machine.

President Trump now understands, as I do, how you can get caught up in a perjury trap. If a prosecutor is on a fishing trip, he/she can take anything you say and expand on it once you open the door. I know this is a bit complex for you to grasp, but here is a dumbed-down version.

In common parlance, many people may believe it means that a prosecutor is trying to get a high-profile target in criminal trouble by asking difficult or embarrassing questions under oath.

Should the suspect then give erroneous testimony, even if the mistake seems innocent enough, the prosecutor will formally accuse the suspect of perjury and threaten him or her with a felony charge that could land him or her in prison.

In legal terms, a “perjury trap” is actually a legal defense to the charge of perjury. It is important to note that the defense has relatively little to do with the subject matter of the prosecutors’ or investigators’ questions. Generally speaking, if the information sought is relevant to the case, then their questions can be as hard to answer or as embarrassing as is necessary.
 
You can keep Lizzie and Petey but... yeah... I like Presidents who DON"T get "captured" ( in a tangled web of lies and lawlessness and subpoenas and search warrants )...

I like Presidents to whom it would never occur to corruptly and arrogantly declare that they could shoot someone in the middle of Fifth Avenue and get away with it...

I like Winners... not Losers ( like the failed Orange Baboon-God )...
/-----/ I don't like presidents who remove 30,000,000 documents from the White House and refuses to make them public as promised while the FBI turns a blind eye.
 
/-----/ No one disputes that. He did say it before he was president and a target of the left's legal attack machine.

President Trump now understands, as I do, how you can get caught up in a perjury trap. If a prosecutor is on a fishing trip, he/she can take anything you say and expand on it once you open the door. I know this is a bit complex for you to grasp, but here is a dumbed-down version.

In common parlance, many people may believe it means that a prosecutor is trying to get a high-profile target in criminal trouble by asking difficult or embarrassing questions under oath.

Should the suspect then give erroneous testimony, even if the mistake seems innocent enough, the prosecutor will formally accuse the suspect of perjury and threaten him or her with a felony charge that could land him or her in prison.

In legal terms, a “perjury trap” is actually a legal defense to the charge of perjury. It is important to note that the defense has relatively little to do with the subject matter of the prosecutors’ or investigators’ questions. Generally speaking, if the information sought is relevant to the case, then their questions can be as hard to answer or as embarrassing as is necessary.

Don't lie and you can't get caught in any trap.
 
That’s really a good question. It’s pretty clear he did. I have a hard time believing he wanted to sell nuclear secrets for money. That seems too outlandish. Before someone said nuclear I’d have assumed it was embarrassing stuff.

It may be simple. I think he hid the second bunch of boxes to sell the documents as presidential memorabilia. He's a grifter after all. He took the artwork from the US embassy in Paris while the ambassador was at the ceremony to honor US soldiers who died in France. Trump thinks he's entitled obviously.
 
I like my presidents to be people who dont have to get their homes searched by law enforcement and dont need to plead the 5th in court .
:clap:

61S2oPw4xBL._AC_SY606_.jpg
 

Forum List

Back
Top