How soon will Biden start another war?

Trump was the only US, president for decades which did not start a war.
uh...what?
?
Clinton, Obama, Carter, Ford...none of 'em started wars.
Clinton , obama started wars trump and Carter did not

Obama didn't start any wars.. Syria was spiraling out of control from 2005 thru 2011.
Obama used our military to oust the lawful leader of Libya. See how that turned out? Clinton invaded Haiti, a sovereign nation. You folks seem to ignore reality when it suits you.

Clinton did the UN's bidding in Haiti.

No, he did it because he wanted to, we have veto power in the UN.

So do several other countries. I was there in Haiti, operating with the UN, so don't tell me shit isn't true that I saw with my own eyes.
 
Biden has dementia and is about ready to check into the memory care unit for skilled nursing care.
He is definitely not the Commander and Chief, nor making any decisions.
The question is.....who is running this ship.....group of democraps?
 
Biden has dementia and is about ready to check into the memory care unit for skilled nursing care.
He is definitely not the Commander and Chief, nor making any decisions.
The question is.....who is running this ship.....group of democraps?

Stop lying.. It makes you look stupid.
 
Trump was the only US, president for decades which did not start a war.
uh...what?
?
Clinton, Obama, Carter, Ford...none of 'em started wars.
Clinton , obama started wars trump and Carter did not

Obama didn't start any wars.. Syria was spiraling out of control from 2005 thru 2011.
Obama used our military to oust the lawful leader of Libya. See how that turned out? Clinton invaded Haiti, a sovereign nation. You folks seem to ignore reality when it suits you.

Clinton did the UN's bidding in Haiti.

No, he did it because he wanted to, we have veto power in the UN.

So do several other countries. I was there in Haiti, operating with the UN, so don't tell me shit isn't true that I saw with my own eyes.
What does that have to do with the US veto power? It was Clinton's war because he wanted it. I was in Gitmo when the invasion happened, providing humanitarian aid to thousands of fleeing Haitians, so I'm not unaware of the situation as a whole.
 
Trump was the only US, president for decades which did not start a war.
uh...what?
?
Clinton, Obama, Carter, Ford...none of 'em started wars.
Clinton , obama started wars trump and Carter did not

Obama didn't start any wars.. Syria was spiraling out of control from 2005 thru 2011.
Obama used our military to oust the lawful leader of Libya. See how that turned out? Clinton invaded Haiti, a sovereign nation. You folks seem to ignore reality when it suits you.

Clinton did the UN's bidding in Haiti.

No, he did it because he wanted to, we have veto power in the UN.

So do several other countries. I was there in Haiti, operating with the UN, so don't tell me shit isn't true that I saw with my own eyes.
What does that have to do with the US veto power? It was Clinton's war because he wanted it. I was in Gitmo when the invasion happened, providing humanitarian aid to thousands of fleeing Haitians, so I'm not unaware of the situation as a whole.

You may have been doing humanitarian aid, but I was assigned to the invasion task force and I personally would have led the Marines ashore had it come to that.
 
I used to think that, but now that China is burying itself in debt and the EU can't get its shit together, I think the dollar would be fine without the oil trade. We'd still need to make certain adjustments, however.

Chinese debt is domestic and is a subject of government's administration. Also Yan is not a freely convertable currency.

While US debt is to big extent is foreign and US does not control many of its holders.

Dollar cannot be fine if Dollar zone shrinks, multiplying debt/currency zone ratio, while Yuan zone cannot shrink.

etc.
State control over currency "range", so to speak, does not equal stability. If it was that simple, Zimbabwe would be just fine right now.

I did not say state control over currency is equial to stability, I said :

1) Yuan flows in and out of the country are controlled, unlike Dollar, so sudden disbalance in flows aka sudden and big currency rate fluctuation is unlikely with Yian.

2) and what is more important - Yuan circulates only in China and its zone cannot shrink at all.

while Dollar circulates mostly abroad and when now Fed pritns money - you don't have hyperinflation only becouse trillions of fresh dollars pour outside.

If Dollar zones shrinks, these dolars will create giant oversupply of money in the US, over demand on material goods, which is exactly Zimbabwe and Venezuela situation.

Actually, the YS us already Venezueka with postponed implementation. And every decrease of dollar usage in the World is very dangerouse. We can discuss only the limin of this decrease when it starts being lethal.
I can agree that all of the Fed printing puts us at risk, but until another currency becomes the world's favored one, we have a lot of flexibility in terms of printing. It is precisely because of the Yuan's controls that it won't become that currency. The only real competitor to the dollar's dominance is the Euro, but the EU has been very dysfunctional as of late.


not really
yes, you have big flexibility and geberally ability at all to print huge volumes of dollars - but not jnlimitedas the Fed seems to think, since as I said inflation already starts accelerating and the end is coming closer even while Dollar is still the World trade and reserve curency (while its share in trade gradually decreases)..

but digital Yuan which is to be introduced soon will make much broader trade ooerations in Yuan possible even with all Chinese controls kept in place.

you can mark all digital Yuans so no need to limit all capital flows to avoid some specific leaks

Can you tell me where the Federal Reserve's printing presses are located?

33, Liberty st. NewYork.. :)
 
I disagree with you on this one as well.
Saudi is Sunni and strongly supports Sunni over Shiites.
Assad is Shiite.
So the Saudis strongly want Assad out of power in Syria.
But since the Shiites are the minority, the only way to prevent massacres is by keeping the minority Shiites in power.

People talk about Iran being such a source of problems in the Mideast, but in my opinion the major source of problems is the Saudis, not the Iranians.
I just long for the day when we no longer depend on the petrodollar. It's the only real reason we get involved in the Middle East usually.

If we didn't have any need to maintain it, we could let the Saudis and Iranians fight each other without any care here.

lol, petrodolar is the only thing which keeps the US alive, without it Dollar Debt Pyramid would have collapsed long ago burying US economy and the country... :)
I used to think that, but now that China is burying itself in debt and the EU can't get its shit together, I think the dollar would be fine without the oil trade. We'd still need to make certain adjustments, however.

Chinese debt is domestic and is a subject of government's administration. Also Yan is not a freely convertable currency.

While US debt is to big extent is foreign and US does not control many of its holders.

Dollar cannot be fine if Dollar zone shrinks, multiplying debt/currency zone ratio, while Yuan zone cannot shrink.

etc.

Who Owns the US National Debt?
The Biggest Owner Is Not Foreign Entities, but U.S. Taxpayershttps://www.thebalance.com/who-owns-the-u-s-national-debt-3306124

Wrong answer, penis breath!


the biggest owner of US national debt soon will be the Fed, if it is not already :)
like in the biggest World debtor (among big economies) and a walking corpse Japan

US is turning into Zimbabwe and Venezuela with Central bank monetizing the debt fast...

but concwrning the subject - if we talk about devaluation of dollar - even present share of foreigners in US, debt can devaluate Dollar if they flee.

plus, add to this all investors in US shares..

You realize that English is beyond your abilities. Right?
I tend to think that I speak at least 3 times more languages than an average American barbarian like you...
 
Trump was the only US, president for decades which did not start a war.
uh...what?
?
Clinton, Obama, Carter, Ford...none of 'em started wars.
Clinton , obama started wars trump and Carter did not

Obama had nothing to do with the Arab Spring or the al Houthis overthrowing the government in Yemen.
lol, the Big Middle East and export of "democracy" into the reguin was exactly Obama's idea

You don't know anything about the ME.. The US would have been happy with the status quo.. We have no magic influence over the Arab Spring. NONE.

We know than nobody here know anything about the ME except you :) If you were a guard in US embassy in Libya it still doesn't make you an expert.. :)


I already asked you, do you speak Arabic? I bet you don't. And how can you know the ME and its policy if you don't understand what politicions say and what is going on, except a small fraction of news which is translated into English and usually distorted by Western media?
Don't you know that Western press is full of propagandist stamps, misinformation and intentional manipulation? :)

I lived across the street from the US Embassy and down the block from the palace.. My father monitored communication and the political winds.

which street? was it Fashloom area?

so, you don't speak Arabic, but are still a unique specialist on the ME... :)

Idris built the palace.. If my memory is accurate it was on Bab al-Azizia. I think its a complete ruin now.

oh, you seem to have been in Libya, but did not frequent the capital itself.. :)

no, Bab al Azizia is much further to the south from the palace, the palace was in the City of gardens...

I know its in the south center of Tripoli.. A lot has happened since 1970 when Gaddafi took over the Idris Palace.

it depends what you consider to be the center of Tripoli, actually the palace was at the end of the main street, the 1st September street, so it is the very center of the city.
 
I disagree with you on this one as well.
Saudi is Sunni and strongly supports Sunni over Shiites.
Assad is Shiite.
So the Saudis strongly want Assad out of power in Syria.
But since the Shiites are the minority, the only way to prevent massacres is by keeping the minority Shiites in power.

People talk about Iran being such a source of problems in the Mideast, but in my opinion the major source of problems is the Saudis, not the Iranians.
I just long for the day when we no longer depend on the petrodollar. It's the only real reason we get involved in the Middle East usually.

If we didn't have any need to maintain it, we could let the Saudis and Iranians fight each other without any care here.

lol, petrodolar is the only thing which keeps the US alive, without it Dollar Debt Pyramid would have collapsed long ago burying US economy and the country... :)
I used to think that, but now that China is burying itself in debt and the EU can't get its shit together, I think the dollar would be fine without the oil trade. We'd still need to make certain adjustments, however.

Chinese debt is domestic and is a subject of government's administration. Also Yan is not a freely convertable currency.

While US debt is to big extent is foreign and US does not control many of its holders.

Dollar cannot be fine if Dollar zone shrinks, multiplying debt/currency zone ratio, while Yuan zone cannot shrink.

etc.

Who Owns the US National Debt?
The Biggest Owner Is Not Foreign Entities, but U.S. Taxpayershttps://www.thebalance.com/who-owns-the-u-s-national-debt-3306124

Wrong answer, penis breath!


the biggest owner of US national debt soon will be the Fed, if it is not already :)
like in the biggest World debtor (among big economies) and a walking corpse Japan

US is turning into Zimbabwe and Venezuela with Central bank monetizing the debt fast...

but concwrning the subject - if we talk about devaluation of dollar - even present share of foreigners in US, debt can devaluate Dollar if they flee.

plus, add to this all investors in US shares..

You realize that English is beyond your abilities. Right?
I tend to think that I speak at least 3 times more languages than an average American barbarian like you...

Speak maybe! You cannot express yourself in the English written word without horrible grammar, misspellings and improper word choice.

BTW, tell me how many languages I speak since you know so much about me!
 
Trump was the only US, president for decades which did not start a war.
uh...what?
?
Clinton, Obama, Carter, Ford...none of 'em started wars.
Clinton , obama started wars trump and Carter did not

Obama didn't start any wars.. Syria was spiraling out of control from 2005 thru 2011.
Obama used our military to oust the lawful leader of Libya. See how that turned out? Clinton invaded Haiti, a sovereign nation. You folks seem to ignore reality when it suits you.

Clinton did the UN's bidding in Haiti.

No, he did it because he wanted to, we have veto power in the UN.

So do several other countries. I was there in Haiti, operating with the UN, so don't tell me shit isn't true that I saw with my own eyes.
What does that have to do with the US veto power? It was Clinton's war because he wanted it. I was in Gitmo when the invasion happened, providing humanitarian aid to thousands of fleeing Haitians, so I'm not unaware of the situation as a whole.

You may have been doing humanitarian aid, but I was assigned to the invasion task force and I personally would have led the Marines ashore had it come to that.
In what capacity would you have been leading these marines? Anyway, that has nothing to do with the facts at hand. The US has veto power over all security council issues, if we agreed to something, its because Clinton wanted to. You haven't and can't dispute that. You can go on rambling about storming the beaches with someone else.
 
Trump was the only US, president for decades which did not start a war.
uh...what?
?
Clinton, Obama, Carter, Ford...none of 'em started wars.
Clinton , obama started wars trump and Carter did not

Obama had nothing to do with the Arab Spring or the al Houthis overthrowing the government in Yemen.
lol, the Big Middle East and export of "democracy" into the reguin was exactly Obama's idea

You don't know anything about the ME.. The US would have been happy with the status quo.. We have no magic influence over the Arab Spring. NONE.

We know than nobody here know anything about the ME except you :) If you were a guard in US embassy in Libya it still doesn't make you an expert.. :)


I already asked you, do you speak Arabic? I bet you don't. And how can you know the ME and its policy if you don't understand what politicions say and what is going on, except a small fraction of news which is translated into English and usually distorted by Western media?
Don't you know that Western press is full of propagandist stamps, misinformation and intentional manipulation? :)

I lived across the street from the US Embassy and down the block from the palace.. My father monitored communication and the political winds.

which street? was it Fashloom area?

so, you don't speak Arabic, but are still a unique specialist on the ME... :)

Idris built the palace.. If my memory is accurate it was on Bab al-Azizia. I think its a complete ruin now.

oh, you seem to have been in Libya, but did not frequent the capital itself.. :)

no, Bab al Azizia is much further to the south from the palace, the palace was in the City of gardens...

I know its in the south center of Tripoli.. A lot has happened since 1970 when Gaddafi took over the Idris Palace.

it depends what you consider to be the center of Tripoli, actually the palace was at the end of the main street, the 1st September street, so it is the very center of the city.

Yes it was at the end of the Street. We were halfway down the block across from the US Embassy.
 
Trump was the only US, president for decades which did not start a war.
uh...what?
?
Clinton, Obama, Carter, Ford...none of 'em started wars.
Clinton , obama started wars trump and Carter did not

Obama didn't start any wars.. Syria was spiraling out of control from 2005 thru 2011.
Obama used our military to oust the lawful leader of Libya. See how that turned out? Clinton invaded Haiti, a sovereign nation. You folks seem to ignore reality when it suits you.

Clinton did the UN's bidding in Haiti.

No, he did it because he wanted to, we have veto power in the UN.

So do several other countries. I was there in Haiti, operating with the UN, so don't tell me shit isn't true that I saw with my own eyes.
What does that have to do with the US veto power? It was Clinton's war because he wanted it. I was in Gitmo when the invasion happened, providing humanitarian aid to thousands of fleeing Haitians, so I'm not unaware of the situation as a whole.

You may have been doing humanitarian aid, but I was assigned to the invasion task force and I personally would have led the Marines ashore had it come to that.
In what capacity would you have been leading these marines? Anyway, that has nothing to do with the facts at hand. The US has veto power over all security council issues, if we agreed to something, its because Clinton wanted to. You haven't and can't dispute that. You can go on rambling about storming the beaches with someone else.

Read Clean Break Strategy from 1996.
 
I disagree with you on this one as well.
Saudi is Sunni and strongly supports Sunni over Shiites.
Assad is Shiite.
So the Saudis strongly want Assad out of power in Syria.
But since the Shiites are the minority, the only way to prevent massacres is by keeping the minority Shiites in power.

People talk about Iran being such a source of problems in the Mideast, but in my opinion the major source of problems is the Saudis, not the Iranians.
I just long for the day when we no longer depend on the petrodollar. It's the only real reason we get involved in the Middle East usually.

If we didn't have any need to maintain it, we could let the Saudis and Iranians fight each other without any care here.

lol, petrodolar is the only thing which keeps the US alive, without it Dollar Debt Pyramid would have collapsed long ago burying US economy and the country... :)
I used to think that, but now that China is burying itself in debt and the EU can't get its shit together, I think the dollar would be fine without the oil trade. We'd still need to make certain adjustments, however.

Chinese debt is domestic and is a subject of government's administration. Also Yan is not a freely convertable currency.

While US debt is to big extent is foreign and US does not control many of its holders.

Dollar cannot be fine if Dollar zone shrinks, multiplying debt/currency zone ratio, while Yuan zone cannot shrink.

etc.

Who Owns the US National Debt?
The Biggest Owner Is Not Foreign Entities, but U.S. Taxpayershttps://www.thebalance.com/who-owns-the-u-s-national-debt-3306124

Wrong answer, penis breath!


the biggest owner of US national debt soon will be the Fed, if it is not already :)
like in the biggest World debtor (among big economies) and a walking corpse Japan

US is turning into Zimbabwe and Venezuela with Central bank monetizing the debt fast...

but concwrning the subject - if we talk about devaluation of dollar - even present share of foreigners in US, debt can devaluate Dollar if they flee.

plus, add to this all investors in US shares..

You realize that English is beyond your abilities. Right?
I tend to think that I speak at least 3 times more languages than an average American barbarian like you...

Speak maybe! You cannot express yourself in the English written word without horrible grammar, misspellings and improper word choice.

BTW, tell me how many languages I speak since you know so much about me!

I will be ready to accept a reproach about my English only after you start speaking Russian or any other foreign language better than I speak English.

most my mistakes are fat finger effect, I often type in my mobile while driving a car or having a couple of minutes, it's bad of course that I don't check spelling sometimes but it's enough if I can make myself understood, including if I can explain to you why the US is going to collapse soon :)
 
Sooner than you might expect... the only question is will it be a civil war or a world war.
 
I used to think that, but now that China is burying itself in debt and the EU can't get its shit together, I think the dollar would be fine without the oil trade. We'd still need to make certain adjustments, however.

Chinese debt is domestic and is a subject of government's administration. Also Yan is not a freely convertable currency.

While US debt is to big extent is foreign and US does not control many of its holders.

Dollar cannot be fine if Dollar zone shrinks, multiplying debt/currency zone ratio, while Yuan zone cannot shrink.

etc.
State control over currency "range", so to speak, does not equal stability. If it was that simple, Zimbabwe would be just fine right now.

I did not say state control over currency is equial to stability, I said :

1) Yuan flows in and out of the country are controlled, unlike Dollar, so sudden disbalance in flows aka sudden and big currency rate fluctuation is unlikely with Yian.

2) and what is more important - Yuan circulates only in China and its zone cannot shrink at all.

while Dollar circulates mostly abroad and when now Fed pritns money - you don't have hyperinflation only becouse trillions of fresh dollars pour outside.

If Dollar zones shrinks, these dolars will create giant oversupply of money in the US, over demand on material goods, which is exactly Zimbabwe and Venezuela situation.

Actually, the YS us already Venezueka with postponed implementation. And every decrease of dollar usage in the World is very dangerouse. We can discuss only the limin of this decrease when it starts being lethal.
I can agree that all of the Fed printing puts us at risk, but until another currency becomes the world's favored one, we have a lot of flexibility in terms of printing. It is precisely because of the Yuan's controls that it won't become that currency. The only real competitor to the dollar's dominance is the Euro, but the EU has been very dysfunctional as of late.


not really
yes, you have big flexibility and geberally ability at all to print huge volumes of dollars - but not jnlimitedas the Fed seems to think, since as I said inflation already starts accelerating and the end is coming closer even while Dollar is still the World trade and reserve curency (while its share in trade gradually decreases)..

but digital Yuan which is to be introduced soon will make much broader trade ooerations in Yuan possible even with all Chinese controls kept in place.

you can mark all digital Yuans so no need to limit all capital flows to avoid some specific leaks
I'm not so sure businesses will want to deal with that level of tracking.
 
Trump was the only US, president for decades which did not start a war.
uh...what?
?
Clinton, Obama, Carter, Ford...none of 'em started wars.
Clinton , obama started wars trump and Carter did not

Obama didn't start any wars.. Syria was spiraling out of control from 2005 thru 2011.
Obama used our military to oust the lawful leader of Libya. See how that turned out? Clinton invaded Haiti, a sovereign nation. You folks seem to ignore reality when it suits you.

Clinton did the UN's bidding in Haiti.

No, he did it because he wanted to, we have veto power in the UN.

So do several other countries. I was there in Haiti, operating with the UN, so don't tell me shit isn't true that I saw with my own eyes.
What does that have to do with the US veto power? It was Clinton's war because he wanted it. I was in Gitmo when the invasion happened, providing humanitarian aid to thousands of fleeing Haitians, so I'm not unaware of the situation as a whole.

You may have been doing humanitarian aid, but I was assigned to the invasion task force and I personally would have led the Marines ashore had it come to that.
In what capacity would you have been leading these marines? Anyway, that has nothing to do with the facts at hand. The US has veto power over all security council issues, if we agreed to something, its because Clinton wanted to. You haven't and can't dispute that. You can go on rambling about storming the beaches with someone else.

I was the boat group commander, not that you would have a clue what that is.
 
Trump was the only US, president for decades which did not start a war.
uh...what?
?
Clinton, Obama, Carter, Ford...none of 'em started wars.
Clinton , obama started wars trump and Carter did not

Obama didn't start any wars.. Syria was spiraling out of control from 2005 thru 2011.
Obama used our military to oust the lawful leader of Libya. See how that turned out? Clinton invaded Haiti, a sovereign nation. You folks seem to ignore reality when it suits you.

Clinton did the UN's bidding in Haiti.

No, he did it because he wanted to, we have veto power in the UN.

So do several other countries. I was there in Haiti, operating with the UN, so don't tell me shit isn't true that I saw with my own eyes.
What does that have to do with the US veto power? It was Clinton's war because he wanted it. I was in Gitmo when the invasion happened, providing humanitarian aid to thousands of fleeing Haitians, so I'm not unaware of the situation as a whole.

You may have been doing humanitarian aid, but I was assigned to the invasion task force and I personally would have led the Marines ashore had it come to that.
In what capacity would you have been leading these marines? Anyway, that has nothing to do with the facts at hand. The US has veto power over all security council issues, if we agreed to something, its because Clinton wanted to. You haven't and can't dispute that. You can go on rambling about storming the beaches with someone else.

I was the boat group commander, not that you would have a clue what that is.
Irrelevant, as no beaches were stormed. Irrelevant even more so since you continue failing to address the matter at hand. It was Clinton's war, end of story. Thanks for playing, you can go on dreaming of your Normandy moment or whatever.
 
Trump was the only US, president for decades which did not start a war.
uh...what?
?
Clinton, Obama, Carter, Ford...none of 'em started wars.
Clinton , obama started wars trump and Carter did not

Obama had nothing to do with the Arab Spring or the al Houthis overthrowing the government in Yemen.
lol, the Big Middle East and export of "democracy" into the reguin was exactly Obama's idea

You don't know anything about the ME.. The US would have been happy with the status quo.. We have no magic influence over the Arab Spring. NONE.

We know than nobody here know anything about the ME except you :) If you were a guard in US embassy in Libya it still doesn't make you an expert.. :)


I already asked you, do you speak Arabic? I bet you don't. And how can you know the ME and its policy if you don't understand what politicions say and what is going on, except a small fraction of news which is translated into English and usually distorted by Western media?
Don't you know that Western press is full of propagandist stamps, misinformation and intentional manipulation? :)

I lived across the street from the US Embassy and down the block from the palace.. My father monitored communication and the political winds.

which street? was it Fashloom area?

so, you don't speak Arabic, but are still a unique specialist on the ME... :)

Idris built the palace.. If my memory is accurate it was on Bab al-Azizia. I think its a complete ruin now.

oh, you seem to have been in Libya, but did not frequent the capital itself.. :)

no, Bab al Azizia is much further to the south from the palace, the palace was in the City of gardens...

I know its in the south center of Tripoli.. A lot has happened since 1970 when Gaddafi took over the Idris Palace.

it depends what you consider to be the center of Tripoli, actually the palace was at the end of the main street, the 1st September street, so it is the very center of the city.

Yes it was at the end of the Street. We were halfway down the block across from the US Embassy.

US e
I used to think that, but now that China is burying itself in debt and the EU can't get its shit together, I think the dollar would be fine without the oil trade. We'd still need to make certain adjustments, however.

Chinese debt is domestic and is a subject of government's administration. Also Yan is not a freely convertable currency.

While US debt is to big extent is foreign and US does not control many of its holders.

Dollar cannot be fine if Dollar zone shrinks, multiplying debt/currency zone ratio, while Yuan zone cannot shrink.

etc.
State control over currency "range", so to speak, does not equal stability. If it was that simple, Zimbabwe would be just fine right now.

I did not say state control over currency is equial to stability, I said :

1) Yuan flows in and out of the country are controlled, unlike Dollar, so sudden disbalance in flows aka sudden and big currency rate fluctuation is unlikely with Yian.

2) and what is more important - Yuan circulates only in China and its zone cannot shrink at all.

while Dollar circulates mostly abroad and when now Fed pritns money - you don't have hyperinflation only becouse trillions of fresh dollars pour outside.

If Dollar zones shrinks, these dolars will create giant oversupply of money in the US, over demand on material goods, which is exactly Zimbabwe and Venezuela situation.

Actually, the YS us already Venezueka with postponed implementation. And every decrease of dollar usage in the World is very dangerouse. We can discuss only the limin of this decrease when it starts being lethal.
I can agree that all of the Fed printing puts us at risk, but until another currency becomes the world's favored one, we have a lot of flexibility in terms of printing. It is precisely because of the Yuan's controls that it won't become that currency. The only real competitor to the dollar's dominance is the Euro, but the EU has been very dysfunctional as of late.


not really
yes, you have big flexibility and geberally ability at all to print huge volumes of dollars - but not jnlimitedas the Fed seems to think, since as I said inflation already starts accelerating and the end is coming closer even while Dollar is still the World trade and reserve curency (while its share in trade gradually decreases)..

but digital Yuan which is to be introduced soon will make much broader trade ooerations in Yuan possible even with all Chinese controls kept in place.

you can mark all digital Yuans so no need to limit all capital flows to avoid some specific leaks
I'm not so sure businesses will want to deal with that level of tracking.

dollar operations already have almost such level of tracking from the US.

plus, such control is our future anyway.

plus, as Marx (or Lenin?) said - for sake of profit a capitalist will sell us a rope on which we well hang him..., i. e. if trade with China is as profitable as it is now - busineses will accept any level of control.
 
Last edited:
I'm not so sure businesses will want to deal with that level of tracking.

dollar operations already have almost such level of tracking from the US.

plus, such control is our future anyway.

plus, as Marx (or Lenin?) said - for sake of profit a capitalist will sell us a rope on which we well hang him..., i. e. if trade with China is as orofitable as it is now - busineses will accept any level of control.
It is true that many American businesses have allowed the CCP to interfere with them a lot in order to have production there.
 

Forum List

Back
Top