Democrats Waking Up

[hadit]

Yup, right after watering it down with his good people on both sides comment.

TRUMP! is a nuanced kind of guy and he was making a nuanced statement. Apparently, the reporting media is stuck on the Orange Man Bad level of discourse.

 

[Slade3200]

TRUMP! has denied involvement, so it's a stretch trying to pin it on him. The narrative is set, however, and the trained seals won't deviate from it.

He wasn’t involved in the judicial playbook the federalist society made him last term. Yet he used it and appointed all their judges.

There is historical precedent to assume he would do so again. So yes, it is political fair game to tie him to it.

 

[Slade3200]

TRUMP! is a nuanced kind of guy and he was making a nuanced statement. Apparently, the reporting media is stuck on the Orange Man Bad level of discourse.

Well what you call nuanced I’d call disgraceful. We are each entitled to our own opinions.

 

[Freedomisneverfree]

Kamala PUKE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[hadit]

He wasn’t involved in the judicial playbook the federalist society made him last term. Yet he used it and appointed all their judges.

There is historical precedent to assume he would do so again. So yes, it is political fair game to tie him to it.

He's actively denied it. Bit of difference there.

 

[LeftofLeft]

What about Trump’s tax cuts that added trillions to the debt? How do Republicans justify that?

#HYPOCRITES

Spending adds to Debt. If spending was limited to essentials and not funding sexual tendencies of fish in Japan, you might have a point.

 

[DBA]

Walking my purple neighborhood in my purple swing state (Michigan), I see not a single Harris sign. Not one. I have never seen that before--just one candidate's signs, not at least a couple of both.

Start coping, because the polls are wrong.

I live is a solid red state. We do have 2-3 fruitcakes in our neighborhood who put up Biden or Harris signs. One has a teacher in the household, go figure. The rest of the neighborhood are sensible, educated professionals. I don't think I could stand living around obnoxious, snide leftists.

 

[DonGlock26]

This is happening throughout the Democrat Party. But "Trump is destroying the Republican Party"

Not everyone wants to be a Democrat welfare queen.

 

[Slade3200]

He's actively denied it. Bit of difference there.

Of course he has denied it. He wants to distance himself from it as he tries to court moderate voters. Makes sense. But I don’t believe a word he says. While I don’t think he is working on it in back room meetings I have little doubt that he will welcome it into the oval and use it as a playbook should he get elected.

 

[konradv]

Spending adds to Debt. If spending was limited to essentials and not funding sexual tendencies of fish in Japan, you might have a point.

So do tax cuts and they weren’t for tip-earners, except that he’d like to include year-end bonuses, along with the bribes SCOTUS allows.

#MAGACORRUPTION

 

[konradv]

That's what Dukakis supporters said...lol

No they didn’t.

#MAGALIES

 

[struth]

He wasn’t involved in the judicial playbook the federalist society made him last term. Yet he used it and appointed all their judges.

There is historical precedent to assume he would do so again. So yes, it is political fair game to tie him to it.

Trump had his own list, likely many names overlapped, that he made public in 2016

Donald Trump Releases List of Possible Supreme Court Picks (Published 2016)

The presumptive Republican nominee for president is trying to quell concerns that he would not select conservative jurists.

www.nytimes.com

 

[LeftofLeft]

So do tax cuts and they weren’t for tip-earners, except that he’d like to include year-end bonuses, along with the bribes SCOTUS allows.

#MAGACORRUPTION

Cut spending

 

[Slade3200]

Trump had his own list, likely many names overlapped, that he made public in 2016

Donald Trump Releases List of Possible Supreme Court Picks (Published 2016)

The presumptive Republican nominee for president is trying to quell concerns that he would not select conservative jurists.

www.nytimes.com

Trumps list came from their playbook. Come on… keep up

 

[Wild Bill Kelsoe]

No they didn’t.

#MAGALIES

Dukakis was 17 points ahead of Bush 41. You bet your ass they were saying the same thing ...lol

 

[struth]

Trumps list came from their playbook. Come on… keep up

So he was involved?? You claimed he wasn’t

 

[Slade3200]

So he was involved?? You claimed he wasn’t

Was he involved how? He certainly used it

 

[struth]

Was he involved how? He certainly used it

So he wasn’t involved? Yes he used some of the names on their list and publicly listed who he thought would be a good choice ib 2016. Similar he publicly shared his platform to today. Which isn’t project 2025

 

[Slade3200]

So he wasn’t involved? Yes he used some of the names on their list and publicly listed who he thought would be a good choice ib 2016. Similar he publicly shared his platform to today. Which isn’t project 2025

I’d say he was absolutely involve with the federalist society when it came to appointing judges and I’d say he would absolutely be involved with the Heritage Foundation to implement many areas of his agenda

 

[struth]

I’d say he was absolutely involve with the federalist society when it came to appointing judges and I’d say he would absolutely be involved with the Heritage Foundation to implement many areas of his agenda

I’m sure like most republicans in office he’ll use the think tanks, the same way dems use rhe brooking institution and rhe ACS.