Bill Nye the Science Guy just announced he is endorsing Kamala Harris.

You should be deported to Gaza. Fuck off with your bullshit.


LOL!!!

I care about America, Traitor.

Why did you cheer when Israel murders Americans??
 
believe in The Bible


LOL!!!

"Soon" means MORE THAN 2000 years from now

Stars are the same size as figs

It takes an IQ over 5 to notice the thing is full of holes...


And to notice who was there, observed it all, wrote the biBULL, and knows it is full of shit...



But in 1980, 1985 and 2008, there were widespread burnings of Christian Bibles in Israel. In 2007, 2010, 2015, 2017, 2020, 2021 and 2023 churches were torched down by Zionist Israelis.




and this is who YOU ARE, why you are SO FUCKING STUPID.

YOU WORSHIP PRECISELY WHO BURNS YOUR STUPID FUCKING BOOK!!!!!


TREASONOUS SELF PROCLAIMED SUB HUMAN MORON!!!!
 
Oy, you really are illiterate…..Bill Nye has a degree in engineering. That doesn't prevent him from being a scientist. A person with a degree in math or engineering can all be scientists if they are skilled in areas that develop and practice science. How many times do you need to embarrass yourself ?



When you can find a "climate scientist" who is willing to answer those questions, let us know...

Someone gave the FBI its fraud case against the Co2 FRAUD which caused homO to go silent for two years.... any idea who did that??


LOL!!!
 


Thank you, Bill. What do you think?

I think he supports the wrong leader in terms of climate change. Stopping the war should be the first priority.

Analyzing Climate Change and the Russia-Ukraine Conflict

The interplay between climate change and the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine presents a complex dilemma for policymakers and the international community. Both issues are critical, but their prioritization can depend on various factors, including immediate humanitarian needs, long-term sustainability, and geopolitical stability.

Impact of the Conflict on Climate Change

The war in Ukraine has significantly exacerbated climate issues. Reports indicate that the conflict has produced approximately 175 million tons of carbon dioxide emissions in just the first two years, which is greater than the annual emissions of 175 countries combined. This escalation in emissions not only contributes to global warming but also complicates efforts to combat climate change, as resources and attention are diverted to military and humanitarian needs.

Moreover, the destruction of infrastructure and natural resources in Ukraine has long-term implications for the country's ability to mitigate climate impacts and adapt to changing environmental conditions. The conflict has also led to increased demand for fossil fuels, which can hinder the transition to renewable energy sources.

Climate Change as a Security Risk

Conversely, climate change itself poses a significant security risk that can exacerbate conflicts. The international community must intensify efforts to address climate-related security threats, as these can lead to instability and conflict in vulnerable regions. The ongoing war in Ukraine highlights how geopolitical tensions can be intertwined with environmental crises, making it essential to consider both issues in tandem.

Humanitarian Considerations

From a humanitarian perspective, the immediate needs of the Ukrainian population affected by the war are pressing. The conflict has resulted in significant loss of life, displacement, and destruction of livelihoods. Addressing these urgent humanitarian needs should be a priority, as the well-being of individuals and communities is paramount.

Long-term Sustainability and Policy Implications

In the long run, however, the implications of climate change could overshadow the immediate impacts of the conflict. The war has the potential to reshape global energy policies, pushing nations towards renewable energy solutions as they seek to reduce dependence on fossil fuels. This shift could ultimately benefit climate action, but it requires a concerted effort to ensure that the transition is equitable and sustainable.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while the conflict in Ukraine demands immediate attention due to its humanitarian implications, the overarching threat of climate change cannot be overlooked. Both issues are interconnected, and prioritizing one over the other may not be feasible. A dual approach that addresses the urgent needs arising from the conflict while simultaneously committing to long-term climate action may be the most effective strategy moving forward.

==> Trump will end the war and that will evidently help fight climate crisis. Harris? She has been supporting the war for years now. And that will undoubtedly worsen the crisis. :(

Sources :










 
1727082433989.webp
 


Thank you, Bill. What do you think?

Who cares what a mechanical scientist endorses? Kate Mulgrew endorsed AOC. NOBODY CARES. She's still a hell of a woman.

If you're trying to drive us against him because of his political endorsement, it means you don't care either. He's a childhood icon to millions of millennials like me. His political proclivities are irrelevant.
 
When you can find a "climate scientist" who is willing to answer those questions, let us know...

Someone gave the FBI its fraud case against the Co2 FRAUD which caused homO to go silent for two years.... any idea who did that??


LOL!!!
Babble….
 
I think he supports the wrong leader in terms of climate change. Stopping the war should be the first priority.

Analyzing Climate Change and the Russia-Ukraine Conflict


The interplay between climate change and the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine presents a complex dilemma for policymakers and the international community. Both issues are critical, but their prioritization can depend on various factors, including immediate humanitarian needs, long-term sustainability, and geopolitical stability.

Impact of the Conflict on Climate Change

The war in Ukraine has significantly exacerbated climate issues. Reports indicate that the conflict has produced approximately 175 million tons of carbon dioxide emissions in just the first two years, which is greater than the annual emissions of 175 countries combined. This escalation in emissions not only contributes to global warming but also complicates efforts to combat climate change, as resources and attention are diverted to military and humanitarian needs.

Moreover, the destruction of infrastructure and natural resources in Ukraine has long-term implications for the country's ability to mitigate climate impacts and adapt to changing environmental conditions. The conflict has also led to increased demand for fossil fuels, which can hinder the transition to renewable energy sources.

Climate Change as a Security Risk

Conversely, climate change itself poses a significant security risk that can exacerbate conflicts. The international community must intensify efforts to address climate-related security threats, as these can lead to instability and conflict in vulnerable regions. The ongoing war in Ukraine highlights how geopolitical tensions can be intertwined with environmental crises, making it essential to consider both issues in tandem.

Humanitarian Considerations

From a humanitarian perspective, the immediate needs of the Ukrainian population affected by the war are pressing. The conflict has resulted in significant loss of life, displacement, and destruction of livelihoods. Addressing these urgent humanitarian needs should be a priority, as the well-being of individuals and communities is paramount.

Long-term Sustainability and Policy Implications

In the long run, however, the implications of climate change could overshadow the immediate impacts of the conflict. The war has the potential to reshape global energy policies, pushing nations towards renewable energy solutions as they seek to reduce dependence on fossil fuels. This shift could ultimately benefit climate action, but it requires a concerted effort to ensure that the transition is equitable and sustainable.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while the conflict in Ukraine demands immediate attention due to its humanitarian implications, the overarching threat of climate change cannot be overlooked. Both issues are interconnected, and prioritizing one over the other may not be feasible. A dual approach that addresses the urgent needs arising from the conflict while simultaneously committing to long-term climate action may be the most effective strategy moving forward.

==> Trump will end the war and that will evidently help fight climate crisis. Harris? She has been supporting the war for years now. And that will undoubtedly worsen the crisis.
:(

Sources :










We all know how Trump will try to end the war. It involves he giving Putin another blow job.
 
Bill Nye the fake science guy is the perfect representative for the dems. Everything the do is fake.
 
Babble….


This is funny, except it isn't.

There is not one single taxpayer funded "climate scientist" willing to answer those questions. They all prefer them censored, as do the media, the Democrat Party, and the PRO ISRAEL RINOs...
 
This is funny, except it isn't.

There is not one single taxpayer funded "climate scientist" willing to answer those questions. They all prefer them censored, as do the media, the Democrat Party, and the PRO ISRAEL RINOs...
More babble.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom