How many times has humanity been wiped down to near extinction?

[Skylar]

There is no way the "Egyptians" built Giza. The confirmation of a complex subterranean architecture now renders this a physical impossibility.

Nonsense. There's no 'confirmation of subterranean architecture'. There's a fantastic reason why they presented their claims in a news conference and not in a study. To say nothing of peer review. They can't back these claims up. They offered an AI generated image with ZERO data set on how they derived that AI image.

That's not confirmation. That's a story.

Clearing and leveling the Giza Plateau was proof enough in itself, but a complex subterranean structure now renders it a physical impossibility that it was bult by "Egyptians"

We have a building in lower Manhattan that is tilting and uninhabitable because the developer thought he could outsmart the foundation. At Giza that problem is multiplied 100 fold!

Um, what? WHY is it '100 fold' more of a problem in Giza? You're offering us fact free assertions.

Again, stories.

If you don't secure the foundation, if you're off by 1/2 inch at the base, you will never get a stable structure at the capstone

Says who? Again, the pyramids have voids, sections filled with rubble, sections filled with sand. The 1/2 tolerances that you 9insist they must abide......they never have abide.

You simply don't know what you're talking about.

If you can't accept that it was built by a prior civilization that was wiped from Earth, that's your problem. To keep trying to attribute it to slave labor and copper or bronze chisels is just silliness

Silliness is imaginary levitation beams that you made up. Where as using coper tools to move quartz is verifiable and reproducible.



So why is that 'silly', and your imaginary 'levitation beams' not?

Remember, we can reproduce the cutting of granite with quartz sand. There is zero evidence of your made up 'levitation beams'.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Nonsense. There's no 'confirmation of subterranean architecture'. There's a fantastic reason why they presented their claims in a news conference and not in a study. To say nothing of peer review. They can't back these claims up. They offered an AI generated image with ZERO data set on how they derived that AI image.

That's not confirmation. That's a story.



Um, what? WHY is it '100 fold' more of a problem in Giza? You're offering us fact free assertions.

Again, stories.



Says who? Again, the pyramids have voids, sections filled with rubble, sections filled with sand. The 1/2 tolerances that you 9insist they must abide......they never have abide.

You simply don't know what you're talking about.


Silliness is imaginary levitation beams that you made up. Where as using coper tools to move quartz is verifiable and reproducible.



So why is that 'silly', and your imaginary 'levitation beams' not?

Remember, we can reproduce the cutting of granite with quartz sand. There is zero evidence of your made up 'levitation beams'.

I stopped reading after “…not in a study”

The original study was published in 2022

Synthetic Aperture Radar Doppler Tomography Reveals Details of Undiscovered High-Resolution Internal Structure of the Great Pyramid of Giza

My friend is rebuilding a Mercedes dealership off of 684 in Katonah and they had to stop work for 6 weeks because there was little to no subsoil engineering done on the original structure. That’s to make sure a 3 story steel frame structure remains standing.

The scope of the site preparation at Giza is several order of magnitude beyond that

 

[Skylar]

I stopped reading after “…not in a study”

The original study was published in 2022

Synthetic Aperture Radar Doppler Tomography Reveals Details of Undiscovered High-Resolution Internal Structure of the Great Pyramid of Giza

My friend is rebuilding a Mercedes dealership off of 684 in Katonah and they had to stop work for 6 weeks because there was little to no subsoil engineering done on the original structure. That’s to make sure a 3 story steel frame structure remains standing.

The scope of the site preparation at Giza is several order of magnitude beyond that

Obviously you stopped reading. Because you never even read what you're linking to. The paper from 2022, which has never been peer reviewed, doesn't make the fantastical claims of 2 kilometer long man-made structures with staircases. Its about the interior of the pyramid itself and passages immediately beneath it.

Here's the link to the 2022 paper itself. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2208.00811

But you've never read the paper. You stopped reading. And they've NEVER released a dataset to back up their fantastical claims about the manmade structures going down 2 kilometers.

Worse, the fantastical new conference findings backed by NO data set or paper, NO peer review of any kind........is contradicted by their 2022 paper. As the passages apparently 'confirmed' by the 2022 paper don't exist in their 2025 'analysis'.

So either their 2022 paper was wrong. Or their 2025 is wrong. Or both.

This is why we release our data sets. This is why there is a peer review of findings. And not just have a former Infowars alum host a news conference.

 

[ReinyDays]

Obviously you stopped reading. Because you never even read what you're linking to. The paper from 2022, which has never been peer reviewed, doesn't make the fantastical claims of 2 kilometer long man-made structures with staircases. Its about the interior of the pyramid itself and passages immediately beneath it.

Here's the link to the 2022 paper itself. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2208.00811

But you've never read the paper. You stopped reading. And they've NEVER released a dataset to back up their fantastical claims about the manmade structures going down 2 kilometers.

Worse, the fantastical new conference findings backed by NO data set or paper, NO peer review of any kind........is contradicted by their 2022 paper. As the passages apparently 'confirmed' by the 2022 paper don't exist in their 2025 'analysis'.

So either their 2022 paper was wrong. Or their 2025 is wrong. Or both.

This is why we release our data sets. This is why there is a peer review of findings. And not just have a former Infowars alum host a news conference.

Thanx for the link ... in the conclusion:

"In this paper we have shown how it is possible to use SAR micro-motion Doppler tomography in an advantageous,
economical, non-invasive and rapid way to make a valid contribution in the study of the structure of ancient megalithic
monuments such as the pyramid of Khnum-Khufu. We are aware that only by confirmation on the field of our findings
can we validate our hypothesis. However it seemed logical to provide a hypothetical interpretation based on the data we
collected that could serve as a starting point for future research. In the near future we would like to extend the SAR
methodology to the investigation of the internal structure of other important monuments of the Giza plateau"

See ... no field confirmation for any of this ... the math gave me nose-bleed, hope you're happy ...

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Obviously you stopped reading. Because you never even read what you're linking to. The paper from 2022, which has never been peer reviewed, doesn't make the fantastical claims of 2 kilometer long man-made structures with staircases. Its about the interior of the pyramid itself and passages immediately beneath it.

Here's the link to the 2022 paper itself. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2208.00811

But you've never read the paper. You stopped reading. And they've NEVER released a dataset to back up their fantastical claims about the manmade structures going down 2 kilometers.

Worse, the fantastical new conference findings backed by NO data set or paper, NO peer review of any kind........is contradicted by their 2022 paper. As the passages apparently 'confirmed' by the 2022 paper don't exist in their 2025 'analysis'.

So either their 2022 paper was wrong. Or their 2025 is wrong. Or both.

This is why we release our data sets. This is why there is a peer review of findings. And not just have a former Infowars alum host a news conference.

The peer reviewed 2022 paper was about validity of using Synthetic Aperture Radar to make the readings.

The subterranean structures revealed by SAR were just released in March 2025 at a conference

You can continue to claim all the readings and the conference are fake because they weren’t peer reviewed, that’s your right

 

[Skylar]

The peer reviewed 2022 paper was about validity of using Synthetic Aperture Radar to make the readings.

The subterranean structures revealed by SAR were just released in March 2025 at a conference

You can continue to claim all the readings and the conference are fake because they weren’t peer reviewed, that’s your right

Peer reviewed....by who? It doesn't say it was peer reviewed, it says it was submitted in 2022. No one can replicate anything they're claiming.

The validity of the process that is CONTRADICTED by their 2025 results, as the very passages they insist were 'revealed' in their 2022 results don't appear in their 2025 results?

How did the process 'reveal' passages in 2022 that it didn't 'reveal' in 2025?

Nor have they released their data sets for their 2025 results, nor any study, peer reviewed or otherwise.And they jumped directly to a press conference and fantastical conclusions about 2km columns that are almost entirely underwater...that they insist must be man-made, complete with staircases.

That's not science. That a story. Which is why they released in a press conference.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

I stopped reading after “…not in a study”

The original study was published in 2022

Synthetic Aperture Radar Doppler Tomography Reveals Details of Undiscovered High-Resolution Internal Structure of the Great Pyramid of Giza

My friend is rebuilding a Mercedes dealership off of 684 in Katonah and they had to stop work for 6 weeks because there was little to no subsoil engineering done on the original structure. That’s to make sure a 3 story steel frame structure remains standing.

The scope of the site preparation at Giza is several order of magnitude beyond that

Just drove past it, it’s 2 story and next exit up from Katonah at Golden’s Bridge

Point being, you cannot place a 2 story structure on a shoddy foundation. It’s physically impossible to place 2MM stones on top of each other unless the foundation was made to accommodate them with no sagging down to some depth to bear that weigh. Like the structure above, it’s inconceivable that the foundation was made with slave labor and billions of bronze chisels.

Don’t believe me, ask an engineer

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Peer reviewed....by who? It doesn't say it was peer reviewed, it says it was submitted in 2022. No one can replicate anything they're claiming.

The validity of the process that is CONTRADICTED by their 2025 results, as the very passages they insist were 'revealed' in their 2022 results don't appear in their 2025 results?

How did the process 'reveal' passages in 2022 that it didn't 'reveal' in 2025?

Nor have they released their data sets for their 2025 results, nor any study, peer reviewed or otherwise.And they jumped directly to a press conference and fantastical conclusions about 2km columns that are almost entirely underwater...that they insist must be man-made, complete with staircases.

That's not science. That a story. Which is why they released in a press conference.

Maybe you’re right

 

[Skylar]

Just drove past it, it’s 2 story and next exit up from Katonah at Golden’s Bridge

Point being, you cannot place a 2 story structure on a shoddy foundation. It’s physically impossible to place 2MM stones on top of each other unless the foundation was made to accommodate them with no sagging down to some depth to bear that weigh. Like the structure above, it’s inconceivable that the foundation was made with slave labor and billions of bronze chisels.

Don’t believe me, ask an engineer

Says who? You're simply asserting physical impossibility, backed by nothing.

You simply 'saying' its physically impossible is meaningless.

Your imaginary 1/2" tolerances are made up. The pyramids have voids filled with rubble, they have voids filled with sand. They are not perfectly arranged limestone blocks at every point. Like any construction project ever, they cut corners.

Your tolerances are imaginary. Your claims of impossibility, unfounded.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Says who? You're simply asserting physical impossibility, backed by nothing.

You simply 'saying' its physically impossible is meaningless, as you have no idea what you're talking about.

Your imaginary 1/2" tolerances are made up. The pyramids have voids filled with rubble, they have voids filled with sand. They are not perfectly arranged limestone blocks at every point.

Your tolerances are imaginary.

Right

Of course

It was either complete beginners luck or Someone at some time in the past calculated the depth to which the foundation had to be solid and the plateau leveled to accommodate massive structures

You tell me

 

[Skylar]

Right

Of course

It was either complete beginners luck or Someone at some time in the past calculated the depth to which the foundation had to be solid and the plateau leveled to accommodate massive structures

You tell me

Or....they used water to mark level. They dug out a foundation, filled it with water, marked blocks on where the water leveled and filled it back in to the marks.

Your 1/2" tolerances weren't. The pyramids had voids filled with rubble and sand. It had blocks that didn't quite match up. Like any major construction project, they cut corners.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Or....they used water to mark level. They dug out a foundation, filled it with water, marked blocks on where the water leveled and filled it back in to the marks.

Your 1/2" tolerances weren't. The pyramids had voids filled with rubble and sand. It had blocks that didn't quite match up. Like any major construction project, they cut corners.

How deep do you suppose they had to dig (with bronze chisels) to confirm the integrity to support the 6 million tons above it (approximately 25 Chrysler Buildings)

One Seaport in Manhattan is tilting because the developer was convinced they could achieve a solid base without drilling 150 feet to the bedrock

Who was the structural engineer at Giza?

 

[Skylar]

How deep do you suppose they had to dig (with bronze chisels) to confirm the integrity to support the 6 million tons above it (approximately 25 Chrysler Buildings)

One Seaport in Manhattan is tilting because the developer was convinced they could achieve a solid base without drilling 150 feet to the bedrock

Who was the structural engineer at Giza?

They just have to get to limestone bedrock. Limestone isn't particularly difficult to work, as demonstrated by the millions of limestone blocks that make up the pyramids.

We have simple, technologically plausible, utterly reasonable explanations for how they laid the foundation. They dug down to bedrock, filled in the foundation they'd dug with water and marked the stones on the perimeter for the water's level. Then emptied the water and used the marks on the perimeter stones to mar

No imaginary levitation beams required. No made-up lasers needed. No fantastical power generators from 2 kilometer long super structures underwater. None of it. Just......water, copper tools and a lot of manpower.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

They just have to get to limestone bedrock. Limestone isn't particularly difficult to work, as demonstrated by the millions of limestone blocks that make up the pyramids.

We have simple, technologically plausible, utterly reasonable explanations for how they laid the foundation. They dug down to bedrock, filled in the foundation they'd dug with water and marked the stones on the perimeter for the water's level. Then emptied the water and used the marks on the perimeter stones to mar

No imaginary levitation beams required. No made-up lasers needed. No fantastical power generators from 2 kilometer long super structures underwater. None of it. Just......water, copper tools and a lot of manpower.

I remain skeptical

 

[ReinyDays]

Don’t believe me, ask an engineer

We have ...



At 2m30s, we begin the discussion about repose angle ... the Bent Pyramid is an example of how the Egyptians discovered this ... they started at one angle, but the stones were sliding, so they changed to the new angle to finish that pyramid ...

Thus, the Great Pyramids of Giza don't have a foundations, they just rest on the ground ... they'll never slid out because all the blocks are within this repose angle ...

Maybe time for you to discuss this with an engineer ... I'm just a carpenter who's built foundations these past 40 years ... we only dig down to the freeze line ... in Giza, that's assumed to be two feet ... the ground rarely freezes there ...

 

[CrusaderFrank]

We have ...



At 2m30s, we begin the discussion about repose angle ... the Bent Pyramid is an example of how the Egyptians discovered this ... they started at one angle, but the stones were sliding, so they changed to the new angle to finish that pyramid ...

Thus, the Great Pyramids of Giza don't have a foundations, they just rest on the ground ... they'll never slid out because all the blocks are within this repose angle ...

Maybe time for you to discuss this with an engineer ... I'm just a carpenter who's built foundations these past 40 years ... we only dig down to the freeze line ... in Giza, that's assumed to be two feet ... the ground rarely freezes there ...

So you’re in the “it’s just dumb luck the “Egyptians” placed 2.3MM blocks weighing over 6MM tons and there was no settling” school of thought

Awesome