Vastator
Platinum Member
- Oct 14, 2014
- 23,468
- 11,118
- 950
Not one body...What 'coils' in Giza? Were these your 'levitation beams'?
As for Giza never being a 'tomb', what then of all the tomb chambers and the granite sarcophagus found inside?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not one body...What 'coils' in Giza? Were these your 'levitation beams'?
As for Giza never being a 'tomb', what then of all the tomb chambers and the granite sarcophagus found inside?
You can have salt blown on from elsewhere. Hydraulic weathering leaves very particular forms. Those are present on the Sphinx, but not the Pyramids.The Pyramids had layers of salt on them.
"The evaporative cooling passage of the Great Pyramid of Giza and the Queen's chamber were discovered with a very hard encrustation of salt, up to one-half inch (1.3 centimeter) thick."
You can have salt blown on from elsewhere. Hydraulic weathering leaves very particular forms. Those are present on the Sphinx, but not the Pyramids.
I have no problem agreeing that the CORE of the Pyramids predate the ancient Egyptians. But the exterior are contemporary with them.You just gotta trust me on this. The Pyramids have been there a very long time
These are pictures of granite edifices on Elaphantine Island. No known date for when they were made, but it has been assumed that it is Egyptian. Feel free to show us anything the Egyptians did that is even close to this level of work. Notice the saw cut. The claim is they used sand abrasion to make those cuts. My question is how do you even start the cutting? There's nothing to focus the sand into the cut. Also, look at the precision of the cut. Copper saws won't do that in a million years. The second image shows the top part with multiple angles, all cut precisely. Once again, WE have a hard time doing that now, with massive grinding machines.
How did they do it with hand tools?
That's my question. Show us a method.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
When have I ever claimed this work was done by aliens. Yes, you resort to the ever popular appeal to authority. I hate to break it to ya, but that's a logical fallacy. I expected better from you.Wait a second ... you're asking me to prove this wasn't done by extra-terrestials? ... these pictures could have come from anywhere ... and the proof is no cesium ...
No ... extra-ordinary claims require extra-ordinary evidence ... my claim is completely ordinary, so my ordinary evidence is this:
![]()
Decoding the Great Pyramid
New archeological evidence sheds light on the stunning engineering of the Great Pyramid of Giza.www.pbs.org
Notice I'm naming my citations, letting you judge the quality of information ... the Egyptians used the tools to quarry that are found ... you know ... in the quarries themselves ... harder rocks (like diabase) breaks softer rocks (like granite) ...ask any geologist ...
When have I ever claimed this work was done by aliens. Yes, you resort to the ever popular appeal to authority. I hate to break it to ya, but that's a logical fallacy. I expected better from you.
Keep playing your pithy games.
The pyramids were not built by humans pulling rocks up ramps with ropes.
Do you allow for common sense in your worldview?Do you have proof, or just doctored photos? ...
Do you allow for common sense in your worldview?
LOL, you cannot distinguish between common sense and propaganda.That Egyptians built the pyramids is common sense ... that ancient astronauts built them with magic is total bullshit ... no matter how well we photochop the images ...
I think the NOVA program presents the "common sense" approach ... or all that can be said with the evidence at hand ... and they show the evidence ... call it "inside the box" material ... read some of Robert Schoch's books if you want pseudo-science ... he does make a compelling case, with evidence ... maybe we have better explanations along that route ...
Keep in mind I'm an uneducated construction worker ... I have A LOT of experience pounding on things with a hammer ... for a rather wide variety of reasons ... including busting up concrete, with a hammer ... the fact remains, there are harder rocks than granite ... starting with jasper, which is common enough ... the clue is the tools at the quarry, it's fair to assume these were the tools they used to work the stone ... rather than cesium belching lasers ...
LOL, you cannot distinguish between common sense and propaganda.
With the recent discovery of Gobekli Tepi, it's indisputable that a prior, advanced human civilization was laid low during the Younger Dryas. By itself it speaks to a prior civilization that warned doom from the sky above. Then you add to it that the Egyptian Priest who told that the destruction happened 9,000 years prior, also dating back to the Younger Dryas.
With respect to the dating of the Sphinx and Great Pyramid, it's clear that these were already there when the Egyptians arrived. Since both the Sphinx and Pyramids show water erosion, they too predate the Younger Dryas. The question is: did the builder of the Pyramids intentionally make a construct they KNEW would survive the certain destruction?
Humans have been the same genetically for 200,000 plus years. The idea that we only developed technology a few thousand years ago is now demonstrable false. They was at least one prior, advanced civilization. I suspect there were others as well
Thoughts?
![]()
Göbekli Tepe - Wikipedia
View attachment 853673
Oh my, you should get into Why Files on youtube. This kind of stuff is right up his alley...
That Egyptians built the pyramids is common sense ... that ancient astronauts built them with magic is total bullshit ... no matter how well we photochop the images ...
I think the NOVA program presents the "common sense" approach ... or all that can be said with the evidence at hand ... and they show the evidence ... call it "inside the box" material ... read some of Robert Schoch's books if you want pseudo-science ... he does make a compelling case, with evidence ... maybe we have better explanations along that route ...
Keep in mind I'm an uneducated construction worker ... I have A LOT of experience pounding on things with a hammer ... for a rather wide variety of reasons ... including busting up concrete, with a hammer ... the fact remains, there are harder rocks than granite ... starting with jasper, which is common enough ... the clue is the tools at the quarry, it's fair to assume these were the tools they used to work the stone ... rather than cesium belching lasers ...
There is no way the "Egyptians" built Giza. The confirmation of a complex subterranean architecture now renders this a physical impossibility.
Clearing and leveling the Giza Plateau was proof enough in itself, but a complex subterranean structure now renders it a physical impossibility that it was bult by "Egyptians"
We have a building in lower Manhattan that is tilting and uninhabitable because the developer thought he could outsmart the foundation. At Giza that problem is multiplied 100 fold!
If you don't secure the foundation, if you're off by 1/2 inch at the base, you will never get a stable structure at the capstone
If you can't accept that it was built by a prior civilization that was wiped from Earth, that's your problem. To keep trying to attribute it to slave labor and copper or bronze chisels is just silliness
Leave the MatrixBecause a prior civilization would have the same problems as the Egyptians ... except without bronze ...
Besides ... Egyptians used diabase chisels ... you're just making stuff up now ... let's see the plan for this foundation that's a half-inch off and then work out the vector diagram and see the pyramid shape is self-stable ... and compare to the Bent Pyramid - Wikipedia ...
You sure are being a sucker for photochop lately ...
Leave the Matrix
Nothing bad will happen
There was a prior world spanning civilization, more advanced and more civilized than us
Not one body...