The conversation, my post, pick one, dummy.So what? What does that have to do with this?What's your point? Do you ever have a point.There's nothing you won't lie about..Do you?.It isn't surprising that you the 2nd Amendment..Yes, Jesus freak and gun nut all rolled into one. Come try to take away either one..It's public record, dummy..what is a schizzo ?
.Only to Germans who try to take away 2nd Amendment rights of Americans.
I have been entirely reasonable with you. But you would have none of it.
grandiose people that dream what they can only wish ...
.It's public record, dummy.
well, your right that's what I was commenting on - how you are always the winner in your dreams when in fact ...
* didn't know you were a gun fanatic sortof fits the picture.
.Yes, Jesus freak and gun nut all rolled into one. Come try to take away either one.
sad and telling the 4th century rolled into a single package, bing - nut cakes everyone of them.
the 2nd amendment - do you believe in traffic stop lights, holy one or should they be made optional like covid masks ...
.It isn't surprising that you the 2nd Amendment.
not sure that makes any sense, holy one.
.
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
.
anotherwards, not for lunatics especially religious fanatics.
- do you ever read what's written before shooting from the hip.
The Right to Bear Arms (i.e. the 2nd Amendment) was seen by our Founding Fathers as the last check against tyranny. They knew that the best line of defense against a standing army was an armed populace.
"If the representatives of the people betray their constituents, there is then no resource left but in the exertion of that original right of self-defense which is paramount to all positive forms of government, and which against the usurpations of the national rulers, may be exerted with infinitely better prospect of success than against those of the rulers of an individual state. In a single state, if the persons intrusted with supreme power become usurpers, the different parcels, subdivisions, or districts of which it consists, having no distinct government in each, can take no regular measures for defense. The citizens must rush tumultuously to arms, without concert, without system, without resource; except in their courage and despair." - Alexander Hamilton, Federalist No. 28
"If circumstances should at any time oblige the government to form an army of any magnitude that army can never be formidable to the liberties of the people while there is a large body of citizens, little, if at all, inferior to them in discipline and the use of arms, who stand ready to defend their own rights and those of their fellow-citizens. This appears to me the only substitute that can be devised for a standing army, and the best possible security against it, if it should exist." - Alexander Hamilton, Federalist No. 28
The people who wish to preserve liberty and are capable of bearing arms are the militia.
“A militia when properly formed are in fact the people themselves…and include, according to the past and general usuage of the states, all men capable of bearing arms… "To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them." - Richard Henry Lee, Federal Farmer No. 18, January 25, 1788
The Founding Fathers believed that peaceable law abiding citizens should never have their right to bear arms be infringed upon.
"And that the said Constitution be never construed to authorize Congress to infringe the just liberty of the Press, or the rights of Conscience; or to prevent the people of the United States, WHO ARE PEACEABLE CITIZENS, from keeping their own arms; …" Samuel Adams quoted in the Philadelphia Independent Gazetteer, August 20, 1789, "Propositions submitted to the Convention of this State"
The fundamental purpose of the militia is to serve as a check upon a standing army, the words “well regulated” referred to the necessity that the armed citizens making up the militia have the level of equipment and training necessary to be an effective and formidable check upon the national government’s standing army.
"I ask who are the militia? They consist now of the whole people, except a few public officers." - George Mason, Address to the Virginia Ratifying Convention, June 4, 1788
"Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed, as they are in almost every country in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops." - Noah Webster, An Examination of the Leading Principles of the Federal Constitution, October 10, 1787
"The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. A well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the best and most natural defense of a free country." - James Madison, I Annals of Congress 434, June 8, 1789
“A militia when properly formed are in fact the people themselves…and include, according to the past and general usuage of the states, all men capable of bearing arms… "To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them." - Richard Henry Lee, Federal Farmer No. 18, January 25, 1788
Well regulated does not mean regulations. When the Constitution specifies regulations it specifically states who and what is being regulated. The phrase "well-regulated" was in common use long before 1789, and remained so for a century thereafter. It referred to the property of something being in proper working order. Something that was well-regulated was calibrated correctly, functioning as expected. The fundamental purpose of the militia was to serve as a check upon a standing army, the words “well regulated” referred to the necessity that the armed citizens making up the militia have the necessary equipment and training necessary to be an effective and formidable check upon the national government’s standing army. Establishing government oversight of the people's arms was not only not the intent in using the phrase in the 2nd amendment, it was precisely to render the government powerless to do so that the founders wrote it.
.Well regulated does not mean regulations.
.
you suck on founding fathers the same as you do jesus and christianity ... through forgeries and fallacies.
they wrote that amendment during the time period to most regulate firearms as much as possible - that is what the majority intended.
bolt or lever action only, maximum 6 round non detachable magazine -
that's it in a nutshell, bing - when the fanatics finally are educated on how properly to manage their cravings. if necessary in your case from in jail.
The Founding Fathers believed that peaceable law abiding citizens should never have their right to bear arms be infringed upon.
"And that the said Constitution be never construed to authorize Congress to infringe the just liberty of the Press, or the rights of Conscience; or to prevent the people of the United States, WHO ARE PEACEABLE CITIZENS, from keeping their own arms; …" Samuel Adams quoted in the Philadelphia Independent Gazetteer, August 20, 1789, "Propositions submitted to the Convention of this State"
"Well-Regulated"
bearingarms.com
The Founding Fathers believed that peaceable law abiding citizens should never have their right to bear arms be infringed upon..bolt or lever action only, maximum 6 round non detachable magazine -
you are brain dead, bing - no one is taking your weapons away from you society simply attempts to regulate for you to kill fewer innocent people as possible - see a psychiatrist.
dingbat. The right to bear arms in CANON LAW
(aka Justinian Code) was denied to jews. Right to
bear arms is also denied to jews in Shariah Law.
Interestingly the right was also denied clergy---
except for purposes of Crusades. The prohibition
for jews MAY have been removed from Canon law--
IDK. It remains a provision of Shariah law
The Bearing of Arms is a right held by the ruling
class in many societies thruout history
we were discussing "the right to bear arms" ---it is a subject with a very interesting history. The Spartans ALSO denied the Helots the RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS
what is "this"??