Darkwind
Diamond Member
- Jun 18, 2009
- 42,109
- 30,672
- 3,615
Well, I don't agree with that. From 79 to about 2000, the policy was that Iran could not be permitted to have nuclear weapons. The policy was aimed at keeping China and the Soviets from arming Iran with nukes.I do question one thing. For many of the years since 1979, we citizens are told that Iran was a few weeks from nukes. A few months from nukes. And so on. endless. Several months ago, we supposedly ended their nuclear program. And then a couple of weeks ago, this. The Shah was dictatorial yet modern. The Ayatollahs are dictatorial and believe in medieval ways of living while using modern weapon technologies to eliminate their enemies.
Somewhere around the middle of the Afghanistan/Iraq war, Iran started acquiring fissile material with the intent to enrich to weapons-grade. They lacked the technical know-how regarding the centrifuges. Until Obama took office, they lacked the resources to obtain those centrifuges. After a pallet or two of hard currency from the United States Democratic Party, they were able to free up the resources to upgrade their technology. It was at that point, I believe, that the policy shifted from centrifugal technology to missile technology, and Iran has made huge strides in their range of missiles. At that time, our Intelligence was flashing the red lights regarding Iran's enrichment ambitions. Everyone thank, Obama.
That so-called Iran deal was proof that Obama and the Democrats were not negotiating on behalf of the United States and started working on managing Iran's acquisition of nukes. That is borderline sedition in My opinion. If you are elected to serve the American people, you NEVER negotiate on behalf of another nation.
Last summer, they hit Iran's enrichment sites and thought they had destroyed them all. They even made announcements that they had.
Enter the Democrats, once again. Right after the attacks, which interfered with their desire to have a nuclear Iran, the Democrats and their propaganda outlets started screaming that it was not destroyed.
Wow, turns out that they were right. A rare occurrence of truth and the Democrat party.
So, the threat we wanted to end remained, even if it was greatly diminished. That means they only need to get their hands on centrifuges from their allies, and they'd be right back in business. We should have taken the current action back last summer, but there were other operations in the planning. Venezuela, for one.
The left has been making great noise about there being no imminent threat from Iran.
THAT HAS NEVER BEEN A STANDARD FOR OUR DEFENSE, EVER!
The Democrats' hopes are that Iran gets a nuke before we go in to stop them, and now they are actively pulling for Iran in direct conflict with their own country.
None of this, and a whole lot of Americans, would still be alive if Bush the Elder or even Clinton had taken from them their ability to threaten the entire region.
The deaths of the Mullahs in Iran have been long overdue. When they are gone, America will be orders of magnitude safer.