She attacked him , he responded with her nick name that took her out?I have never seen blood thirsty group of people before.
they have went from fake news 24 hours a day to personal name-calling attacks 24 hours a day on President Trump.
when he wins in November they will de so defeated, how do you recover?personal name-calling
They are the media. What's his excuse?
Do you have a point to make?
Yes, your problem with personal attacks seems to just apply to the media. When Trump does it, someone who I would assert has a larger impact on society you have no problem with it.
Trump only responds to attacks. You need to show respect not be a activist for the DNC.. if you can step down as A journalist
Oh can you show exactly what "attack" prompted "Pocahontas" or lying ted or basically any of them? Criticism is not an attack by the way.
You think trump attacked Liz Warren? I’m pretty sure it was a response to her incoherent rambling about trump. And ted did attack trump when he became the leader in the polls.
What name did she call him? What name did Ted Cruz call him?
I don't "think" he attacked her. I "saw" he attacked her.
And yet you can't show me this attack. It's that simple. As I said your problems with personal attacks seem to be very conditional.
Why would trump ever bring up Warren? He had no reason. She opened her mouth attacked him and he took her out haha I love it.. trump is never the first to attack.. if you can prove it.. please do .. if not take a hike loser
Sure. I'll prove it.
This was an attack on a twitter employee because he posted updated terms on the platform. Updating our Approach to Misleading InformationTrump attacks Twitter employee while defending fact-checked tweets on mail-in ballots
Twitter had added warning tags to two of Trump's tweets about mail-in ballots, inviting readers to "get the facts" and linking to a page calling the president's claims "unsubstantiated."www.cnbc.com
This was his post. Find the attack here that makes him "a hater"
View attachment 360034
What did she do?
Or she?
I could go on but you get the point.
Let’s start with Warren the. Ted Cruz.. can you prove trump attacked first?
Not how it works. You claimed Trump is NEVER the first to attack. I showed otherwise. So now it's your turn to prove that Warren attacked him first. It's your claim so you need to support it.
You didn’t prove it.. stop trolling
So now you are making other claims. Machado, Cruz and Roth all attacked Trump first? Fine substantiate that. I've shown you Trumps' attack now you need to be able to show a reason why. This is not trolling. Debates require people to substantiate their assertions. If you aren't able to don't blame me.
You brought it up,, I’m saying that trump DIDNT ATTACK warren first, you said he did prove it
How do you prove something didn't happen? The onus of proof is always on the one making the claim. I asserted that Trump attacked Warren and provided the video that showed him doing it. You claim he did it in response to an attack by Warren. The burden to prove that is yours. You also claimed the same for those other instances
In court, you don't ask someone to prove he didn't do something either right?
Everyone knows trump only responses to attacks. He would have no reason to respond to Warren at that time.. not sure he even knew who she was until she said something
"Everyone knows" is not a response. It's a logical fallacy YOU are claiming something, YOU support it. I could support my claims.
I’m just going off memory,, it was in response to her attack .. he never attacks first never
Your memory should be able to be substantiated right? We are talking about 2 high profile individuals. You have google find it. I'll make it easy. You have 4 different people I claimed Trump DID attack first. Find me the attack that according to you happened before for any of them.
If it wasn’t Blatantly obvious trump doesn’t attack first I would make an attempt.. but we all know he doesn’t.. what else do you have ??
If it is so blatantly obvious you shouldn't have to resort to these kinds of arguments
You the one that says he names calls lol only in response of an attack.. and Hes Devastatingly accurate with his strikes
She opened her mouth attacked him and he took her outWho's making that claim again?trump is never the first to attack
Huh
You did write this right? At this point, I have to ask do you just throw stuff at the wall hoping it will stick? You claim to be able to go by memory, but from where I'm sitting you seem unable to remember what you wrote one post ago.You the one that says he names calls lol only in response of an attack
Stop trolling trump attacks when attacked
Stop asserting stuff you are unable to back up.
Ask anyone here trump
Doesn’t attack .. just deal with reality
Just did. Another failed assertion.Of course, he was the first to attack if you watched the Republican debates.
I see no proof sorry
Ask anyone here trump
Doesn’t attack
Remedial English or some intellectual honesty will probably solve that.Of course, he was the first to attack if you watched the Republican debates.