If Harris somehow wins, will this mean the end of Primary voting for the Democratic Party?

[busybee01]

In 2016 they anointed Hillary because Bernie didn't have the donor power that the Establishment Hillary had. He was deemed "dangerous". Of course we all know the outcome and he is now largely irrelevant after he endorsed Hillary.

After her loss, the MSM and Democrat operatives kept repeating "we can't repeat this facade again, we need a competent candidate who is challenged in a Primary and wins in a democratic process. After all, we are the Democratic Party damn it!"

Now we observe history repeating itself as Harris is anointed. Not once, but twice if one is objective. First as V.P with 2% of the delegate vote in the 2020 Primary and now 0% votes in the 2024 Primary.

Clearly Dem voters are not happy. Some don't care about democracy they will obediently put on their pom poms and accept their Rulers decisions on their behalf, similar to what a pleb in China or N Korea does today. Others have become a little bit too uppity on youtube (one Asian guy in particular) and they have declared that they will punish the Dems for their tactics and name calling of Trump as Hitler etc and thus vote for Trump to spite the Dems.

Therefore, if Harris wins in 2024, will this affirm the Democrat Parties position that they know what is best for their subjects and going forward they will refer to their Chamber of donors, mainstream media, Party Seniors (Obama, Pelosi etc) and Super Delegates to produce the greatest politician possible.

Is this a fair assessment? If not, what leads you to believe that after the last two cycles of them anointed a leader that somehow they will change going forward?

You are a stupid asshole. The dutifully elected delegates could choose anyone they want once Biden released them. That is the democratic process. The Republican Party is the party that is against democracy.

 

[Polishprince]

You are a stupid asshole. The dutifully elected delegates could choose anyone they want once Biden released them. That is the democratic process. The Republican Party is the party that is against democracy.

Sure. But if Biden is going to withdraw from the campaign at such a late date, he owes an explanation to the Democrat voters as to why he is leaving and what has changed.

Its unfair to the Democrat voters as well as potential Democrat candidates who might have entered the race if they knew Sleepy Joe wasn't going to follow through with his candidacy.

 

[Lesh]

Sure. But if Biden is going to withdraw from the campaign at such a late date, he owes an explanation to the Democrat voters as to why he is leaving and what has changed.

Its unfair to the Democrat voters as well as potential Democrat candidates who might have entered the race if they knew Sleepy Joe wasn't going to follow through with his candidacy.

A Republican telling Dems that Biden owes Dems… something?

Shaddup

 

[Polishprince]

A Republican telling Dems that Biden owes Dems… something?

Shaddup

Why wouldn't he owe them? Don't Dems have a right to have a proper opportunity to actually vet their candidate before nominating them?

 

[Lesh]

Why wouldn't he owe them? Don't Dems have a right to have a proper opportunity to actually vet their candidate before nominating them?

What the fuck do you care? You’re a partisan Trumper

 

[rightwinger]

Sure. But if Biden is going to withdraw from the campaign at such a late date, he owes an explanation to the Democrat voters as to why he is leaving and what has changed.

Its unfair to the Democrat voters as well as potential Democrat candidates who might have entered the race if they knew Sleepy Joe wasn't going to follow through with his candidacy.

I didn’t hear any Democrats asking for an explanation

 

[Polishprince]

I didn’t hear any Democrats asking for an explanation

Apparently, the Democrats don't like to choose their own candidates and would just as soon take instructions from those who rule the party. I don't think that Republicans would go for this as much.

 

[Lesh]

Apparently, the Democrats don't like to choose their own candidates and would just as soon take instructions from those who rule the party. I don't think that Republicans would go for this as much.

I might have chosen someone else but Harris is fine and she’ll win.

That’s what matters more than anything

Save your concern for Couch Boy and the Orange Shitgibbon

 

[80zephyr]

You are a stupid asshole. The dutifully elected delegates could choose anyone they want once Biden released them. That is the democratic process. The Republican Party is the party that is against democracy.

Then why did they spend 100 million dollars to keep RFK out of the primaries?

 

[Polishprince]

Then why did they spend 100 million dollars to keep RFK out of the primaries?

Now they are acting as if the Kennedys are "traitors", even after they did everything they could to silence him.

 

[Lesh]

Then why did they spend 100 million dollars to keep RFK out of the primaries?

Given that he just threw in with Trump… apparently he didn’t belong on the Dem primary

 

[80zephyr]

Given that he just threw in with Trump… apparently he didn’t belong on the Dem primary

That is what happens when you are rejected.

 

[hadit]

Harris went from testing the waters for a Presidential nomination to Vice President to the Democratic nomination

You left that part out

She has yet to receive a single vote from a voter. Clearly, democrats don't care about the wishes of the voter.

 

[Foxfyre]

In 2016 they anointed Hillary because Bernie didn't have the donor power that the Establishment Hillary had. He was deemed "dangerous". Of course we all know the outcome and he is now largely irrelevant after he endorsed Hillary.

After her loss, the MSM and Democrat operatives kept repeating "we can't repeat this facade again, we need a competent candidate who is challenged in a Primary and wins in a democratic process. After all, we are the Democratic Party damn it!"

Now we observe history repeating itself as Harris is anointed. Not once, but twice if one is objective. First as V.P with 2% of the delegate vote in the 2020 Primary and now 0% votes in the 2024 Primary.

Clearly Dem voters are not happy. Some don't care about democracy they will obediently put on their pom poms and accept their Rulers decisions on their behalf, similar to what a pleb in China or N Korea does today. Others have become a little bit too uppity on youtube (one Asian guy in particular) and they have declared that they will punish the Dems for their tactics and name calling of Trump as Hitler etc and thus vote for Trump to spite the Dems.

Therefore, if Harris wins in 2024, will this affirm the Democrat Parties position that they know what is best for their subjects and going forward they will refer to their Chamber of donors, mainstream media, Party Seniors (Obama, Pelosi etc) and Super Delegates to produce the greatest politician possible.

Is this a fair assessment? If not, what leads you to believe that after the last two cycles of them anointed a leader that somehow they will change going forward?

I think if Harris wins, and we cannot rule that out as a possibility, most especially if she has a Democrat controlled Senate and with even higher probability if she also has a Democrat controlled House, we will never have another honest election in our lifetime and the court system will be so politicized that it will no longer function as intended. And yes that includes the Supreme Court.

 

[rightwinger]

She has yet to receive a single vote from a voter. Clearly, democrats don't care about the wishes of the voter.

She received 81 million votes

 

[rightwinger]

I think if Harris wins, and we cannot rule that out as a possibility, most especially if she has a Democrat controlled Senate and with even higher probability if she also has a Democrat controlled House, we will never have another honest election in our lifetime and the court system will be so politicized that it will no longer function as intended. And yes that includes the Supreme Court.

As long as Trump is allowed to run, we will never have an honest election

 

[WorldWatcher]

As long as Trump is allowed to run, we will never have an honest election

Well you could say "As long as Trump is allowed to run, we will never have an honest candidate."

Just say'n.

WW

 

[hadit]

She received 81 million votes

No, the ticket did. Without Quid Pro Joe at the top, should have received far, far fewer votes.

 

[hadit]

As long as Trump is allowed to run, we will never have an honest election

So you have to be dishonest to stop him. Got it.

 

[Foxfyre]

As long as Trump is allowed to run, we will never have an honest election

I would ask you to give any kind of logic, reason or rationale for that but I know you can't and won't so I'll just revert back to my New Year's Resolution.