How devastating will it be for the media when trump wins in 2020

[Mikeoxenormous]

1. If I am able to vote, I will vote for President Trump.

a. The main reason for my choosing him is that it is a protest vote against all the senseless violent crime in this country and letting the perps just walk away.

2. But I do not see how he can possibly win, especially with the mail-in ballots and, of course, the horrific COVID-19 situation.

3. If FATE surprises us, however, and he actually wins, the consequences will be mind-shattering for the media and everyone else.

a. The Dems last time just cried on election night.

b. If he wins this time, there will be riots in all the big cities that will make the recent disorders look like child's play.

c. Some Dems will try to get sympathetic generals to mount a coup.

d. Some Dems will proclaim Mr. Biden (or whoever their candidate is on Nov. 3) as the legitimate president.

e. The media will refer to him as the "so-called president."

f. If the Dems get the House, they will immediately impeach him.

g. If both Houses are in Dems' hands, he will be removed.


In other words, the United States of America will become like Venezuela, with two persons claiming to be the president. We will have finally arrived as a banana republic.

Wow kid,. First pull yer head outta faux news, then go see a Dr.

Thanks for calling me "kid." I'm 83.

On Nov. 3, we shall see how "faux" the news is.

In any event, Mr. Biden will win. No need for the Dems to mount a coup.

Thanks for calling me "kid." I'm 83.

We know as the saying goes.

 

[Jitss617]

I have never seen blood thirsty group of people before.
they have went from fake news 24 hours a day to personal name-calling attacks 24 hours a day on President Trump.

when he wins in November they will de so defeated, how do you recover?

personal name-calling

They are the media. What's his excuse?

Do you have a point to make?

Yes, your problem with personal attacks seems to just apply to the media. When Trump does it, someone who I would assert has a larger impact on society you have no problem with it.

Trump only responds to attacks. You need to show respect not be a activist for the DNC.. if you can step down as A journalist

?
Oh can you show exactly what "attack" prompted "Pocahontas" or lying ted or basically any of them? Criticism is not an attack by the way.

You think trump attacked Liz Warren? I’m pretty sure it was a response to her incoherent rambling about trump. And ted did attack trump when he became the leader in the polls.

What name did she call him? What name did Ted Cruz call him?

I don't "think" he attacked her. I "saw" he attacked her.

She attacked him , he responded with her nick name that took her out

And yet you can't show me this attack. It's that simple. As I said your problems with personal attacks seem to be very conditional.

Why would trump ever bring up Warren? He had no reason. She opened her mouth attacked him and he took her out haha I love it.. trump is never the first to attack.. if you can prove it.. please do .. if not take a hike loser

Sure. I'll prove it.

Trump attacks Twitter employee while defending fact-checked tweets on mail-in ballots

Twitter had added warning tags to two of Trump's tweets about mail-in ballots, inviting readers to "get the facts" and linking to a page calling the president's claims "unsubstantiated."

www.cnbc.com

This was an attack on a twitter employee because he posted updated terms on the platform. Updating our Approach to Misleading Information
This was his post. Find the attack here that makes him "a hater"

View attachment 360034
What did she do?

Or she?
I could go on but you get the point.

Let’s start with Warren the. Ted Cruz.. can you prove trump attacked first?

Not how it works. You claimed Trump is NEVER the first to attack. I showed otherwise. So now it's your turn to prove that Warren attacked him first. It's your claim so you need to support it.

You didn’t prove it.. stop trolling

So now you are making other claims. Machado, Cruz and Roth all attacked Trump first? Fine substantiate that. I've shown you Trumps' attack now you need to be able to show a reason why. This is not trolling. Debates require people to substantiate their assertions. If you aren't able to don't blame me.

You brought it up,, I’m saying that trump DIDNT ATTACK warren first, you said he did prove it

How do you prove something didn't happen? The onus of proof is always on the one making the claim. I asserted that Trump attacked Warren and provided the video that showed him doing it. You claim he did it in response to an attack by Warren. The burden to prove that is yours. You also claimed the same for those other instances

In court, you don't ask someone to prove he didn't do something either right?

Everyone knows trump only responses to attacks. He would have no reason to respond to Warren at that time.. not sure he even knew who she was until she said something

"Everyone knows" is not a response. It's a logical fallacy YOU are claiming something, YOU support it. I could support my claims.

I’m just going off memory,, it was in response to her attack .. he never attacks first never

Your memory should be able to be substantiated right? We are talking about 2 high profile individuals. You have google find it. I'll make it easy. You have 4 different people I claimed Trump DID attack first. Find me the attack that according to you happened before for any of them.

If it wasn’t Blatantly obvious trump doesn’t attack first I would make an attempt.. but we all know he doesn’t.. what else do you have ??

If it is so blatantly obvious you shouldn't have to resort to these kinds of arguments

You the one that says he names calls lol only in response of an attack.. and Hes Devastatingly accurate with his strikes

 

[Bobob]

I have never seen blood thirsty group of people before.
they have went from fake news 24 hours a day to personal name-calling attacks 24 hours a day on President Trump.

when he wins in November they will de so defeated, how do you recover?

Name-calling? Trump is the master at name-calling. The only thing fake about the news to Trump is when the media holds Trump accountable. If the news favors Trump, it is great. If the news doesn't favor Trump, it is "fake". You people are so easily conned.

It’s all fake news.. first he’s a president of United States of America you don’t attack your own president.. just because you’re Maddie one get a life.. Your job is to report the news not be a political activist for the DNC

The president of the Untited States doesn't call his political opponents lying or sleepy or crooked or lazy-eyed. He doesn't attack the looks of the wife of his opponent or suggest his father was involved in the Kennedy assassination. Trump accuses Cruz's father of helping JFK's assassin

At least until Trump those were the norms.

So?

So, lamenting personal name-calling is about as hypocritical as it gets.

You canT prove he was the first to attack.

Of course, he was the first to attack if you watched the Republican debates. It was unnecessary and got me to thinkin' that this bozo was not prepared to debate and spent his time personally abusing his opponents rather than debating the issues.

 

[Jitss617]

I have never seen blood thirsty group of people before.
they have went from fake news 24 hours a day to personal name-calling attacks 24 hours a day on President Trump.

when he wins in November they will de so defeated, how do you recover?

Name-calling? Trump is the master at name-calling. The only thing fake about the news to Trump is when the media holds Trump accountable. If the news favors Trump, it is great. If the news doesn't favor Trump, it is "fake". You people are so easily conned.

It’s all fake news.. first he’s a president of United States of America you don’t attack your own president.. just because you’re Maddie one get a life.. Your job is to report the news not be a political activist for the DNC

The president of the Untited States doesn't call his political opponents lying or sleepy or crooked or lazy-eyed. He doesn't attack the looks of the wife of his opponent or suggest his father was involved in the Kennedy assassination. Trump accuses Cruz's father of helping JFK's assassin

At least until Trump those were the norms.

So?

So, lamenting personal name-calling is about as hypocritical as it gets.

You canT prove he was the first to attack.

Of course, he was the first to attack if you watched the Republican debates. It was unnecessary and got me to thinkin' that this bozo was not prepared to debate and spent his time personally abusing his opponents rather than debating the issues.

It was a debate that means he responded to ted.. anything else?

 

[Bobob]

I have never seen blood thirsty group of people before.
they have went from fake news 24 hours a day to personal name-calling attacks 24 hours a day on President Trump.

when he wins in November they will de so defeated, how do you recover?

Name-calling? Trump is the master at name-calling. The only thing fake about the news to Trump is when the media holds Trump accountable. If the news favors Trump, it is great. If the news doesn't favor Trump, it is "fake". You people are so easily conned.

It’s all fake news.. first he’s a president of United States of America you don’t attack your own president.. just because you’re Maddie one get a life.. Your job is to report the news not be a political activist for the DNC

The president of the Untited States doesn't call his political opponents lying or sleepy or crooked or lazy-eyed. He doesn't attack the looks of the wife of his opponent or suggest his father was involved in the Kennedy assassination. Trump accuses Cruz's father of helping JFK's assassin

At least until Trump those were the norms.

So?

So, lamenting personal name-calling is about as hypocritical as it gets.

You canT prove he was the first to attack.

Of course, he was the first to attack if you watched the Republican debates. It was unnecessary and got me to thinkin' that this bozo was not prepared to debate and spent his time personally abusing his opponents rather than debating the issues.

It was a debate that means he responded to ted.. anything else?

That was certainly not a debate on the issues. He responded by changing the subject and getting personal to avoid debating. If you are ok with your guy being an asshole, then so be it.

 

[Jitss617]

I have never seen blood thirsty group of people before.
they have went from fake news 24 hours a day to personal name-calling attacks 24 hours a day on President Trump.

when he wins in November they will de so defeated, how do you recover?

Name-calling? Trump is the master at name-calling. The only thing fake about the news to Trump is when the media holds Trump accountable. If the news favors Trump, it is great. If the news doesn't favor Trump, it is "fake". You people are so easily conned.

It’s all fake news.. first he’s a president of United States of America you don’t attack your own president.. just because you’re Maddie one get a life.. Your job is to report the news not be a political activist for the DNC

The president of the Untited States doesn't call his political opponents lying or sleepy or crooked or lazy-eyed. He doesn't attack the looks of the wife of his opponent or suggest his father was involved in the Kennedy assassination. Trump accuses Cruz's father of helping JFK's assassin

At least until Trump those were the norms.

So?

So, lamenting personal name-calling is about as hypocritical as it gets.

You canT prove he was the first to attack.

Of course, he was the first to attack if you watched the Republican debates. It was unnecessary and got me to thinkin' that this bozo was not prepared to debate and spent his time personally abusing his opponents rather than debating the issues.

It was a debate that means he responded to ted.. anything else?

That was certainly not a debate on the issues. He responded by changing the subject and getting personal to avoid debating. If you are ok with your guy being an asshole, then so be it.

Cool story

 

[citygator]

Fake news. All Trump is winning is an all expense paid Security detail in retirement. If Trump actually dies in office before the election he’d stand a much better chance of winning. More people would vote for him if he wasn’t going to run things.

 

[Meathead]

I have never seen blood thirsty group of people before.
they have went from fake news 24 hours a day to personal name-calling attacks 24 hours a day on President Trump.

when he wins in November they will de so defeated, how do you recover?

Name-calling? Trump is the master at name-calling. The only thing fake about the news to Trump is when the media holds Trump accountable. If the news favors Trump, it is great. If the news doesn't favor Trump, it is "fake". You people are so easily conned.

It’s all fake news.. first he’s a president of United States of America you don’t attack your own president.. just because you’re Maddie one get a life.. Your job is to report the news not be a political activist for the DNC

The president of the Untited States doesn't call his political opponents lying or sleepy or crooked or lazy-eyed. He doesn't attack the looks of the wife of his opponent or suggest his father was involved in the Kennedy assassination. Trump accuses Cruz's father of helping JFK's assassin

At least until Trump those were the norms.

So?

So, lamenting personal name-calling is about as hypocritical as it gets.

You canT prove he was the first to attack.

Of course, he was the first to attack if you watched the Republican debates. It was unnecessary and got me to thinkin' that this bozo was not prepared to debate and spent his time personally abusing his opponents rather than debating the issues.

It was a debate that means he responded to ted.. anything else?

That was certainly not a debate on the issues. He responded by changing the subject and getting personal to avoid debating. If you are ok with your guy being an asshole, then so be it.

What was he supposed to call her, Honest Hillary?

 

[Jitss617]

Fake news. All Trump is winning is an all expense paid Security detail in retirement. If Trump actually dies in office before the election he’d stand a much better chance of winning. More people would vote for him if he wasn’t going to run things.

It won’t be close.. you are getting swept in Virginia and California already, 4 blacks reps have switched to republican.. your party is over

 

[forkup]

I have never seen blood thirsty group of people before.
they have went from fake news 24 hours a day to personal name-calling attacks 24 hours a day on President Trump.

when he wins in November they will de so defeated, how do you recover?

personal name-calling

They are the media. What's his excuse?

Do you have a point to make?

Yes, your problem with personal attacks seems to just apply to the media. When Trump does it, someone who I would assert has a larger impact on society you have no problem with it.

Trump only responds to attacks. You need to show respect not be a activist for the DNC.. if you can step down as A journalist

?
Oh can you show exactly what "attack" prompted "Pocahontas" or lying ted or basically any of them? Criticism is not an attack by the way.

You think trump attacked Liz Warren? I’m pretty sure it was a response to her incoherent rambling about trump. And ted did attack trump when he became the leader in the polls.

What name did she call him? What name did Ted Cruz call him?

I don't "think" he attacked her. I "saw" he attacked her.

She attacked him , he responded with her nick name that took her out

And yet you can't show me this attack. It's that simple. As I said your problems with personal attacks seem to be very conditional.

Why would trump ever bring up Warren? He had no reason. She opened her mouth attacked him and he took her out haha I love it.. trump is never the first to attack.. if you can prove it.. please do .. if not take a hike loser

Sure. I'll prove it.

Trump attacks Twitter employee while defending fact-checked tweets on mail-in ballots

Twitter had added warning tags to two of Trump's tweets about mail-in ballots, inviting readers to "get the facts" and linking to a page calling the president's claims "unsubstantiated."

www.cnbc.com

This was an attack on a twitter employee because he posted updated terms on the platform. Updating our Approach to Misleading Information
This was his post. Find the attack here that makes him "a hater"

View attachment 360034
What did she do?

Or she?
I could go on but you get the point.

Let’s start with Warren the. Ted Cruz.. can you prove trump attacked first?

Not how it works. You claimed Trump is NEVER the first to attack. I showed otherwise. So now it's your turn to prove that Warren attacked him first. It's your claim so you need to support it.

You didn’t prove it.. stop trolling

So now you are making other claims. Machado, Cruz and Roth all attacked Trump first? Fine substantiate that. I've shown you Trumps' attack now you need to be able to show a reason why. This is not trolling. Debates require people to substantiate their assertions. If you aren't able to don't blame me.

You brought it up,, I’m saying that trump DIDNT ATTACK warren first, you said he did prove it

How do you prove something didn't happen? The onus of proof is always on the one making the claim. I asserted that Trump attacked Warren and provided the video that showed him doing it. You claim he did it in response to an attack by Warren. The burden to prove that is yours. You also claimed the same for those other instances

In court, you don't ask someone to prove he didn't do something either right?

Everyone knows trump only responses to attacks. He would have no reason to respond to Warren at that time.. not sure he even knew who she was until she said something

"Everyone knows" is not a response. It's a logical fallacy YOU are claiming something, YOU support it. I could support my claims.

I’m just going off memory,, it was in response to her attack .. he never attacks first never

Your memory should be able to be substantiated right? We are talking about 2 high profile individuals. You have google find it. I'll make it easy. You have 4 different people I claimed Trump DID attack first. Find me the attack that according to you happened before for any of them.

If it wasn’t Blatantly obvious trump doesn’t attack first I would make an attempt.. but we all know he doesn’t.. what else do you have ??

If it is so blatantly obvious you shouldn't have to resort to these kinds of arguments

You the one that says he names calls lol only in response of an attack.. and Hes Devastatingly accurate with his strikes

She opened her mouth attacked him and he took her out

trump is never the first to attack

Who's making that claim again?

 

[toobfreak]

How devastating will it be for the media when trump wins in 2020

We are prepared. They are a vocal lot of whiny, sissy, a-holes.

 

[Jitss617]

I have never seen blood thirsty group of people before.
they have went from fake news 24 hours a day to personal name-calling attacks 24 hours a day on President Trump.

when he wins in November they will de so defeated, how do you recover?

personal name-calling

They are the media. What's his excuse?

Do you have a point to make?

Yes, your problem with personal attacks seems to just apply to the media. When Trump does it, someone who I would assert has a larger impact on society you have no problem with it.

Trump only responds to attacks. You need to show respect not be a activist for the DNC.. if you can step down as A journalist

?
Oh can you show exactly what "attack" prompted "Pocahontas" or lying ted or basically any of them? Criticism is not an attack by the way.

You think trump attacked Liz Warren? I’m pretty sure it was a response to her incoherent rambling about trump. And ted did attack trump when he became the leader in the polls.

What name did she call him? What name did Ted Cruz call him?

I don't "think" he attacked her. I "saw" he attacked her.

She attacked him , he responded with her nick name that took her out

And yet you can't show me this attack. It's that simple. As I said your problems with personal attacks seem to be very conditional.

Why would trump ever bring up Warren? He had no reason. She opened her mouth attacked him and he took her out haha I love it.. trump is never the first to attack.. if you can prove it.. please do .. if not take a hike loser

Sure. I'll prove it.

Trump attacks Twitter employee while defending fact-checked tweets on mail-in ballots

Twitter had added warning tags to two of Trump's tweets about mail-in ballots, inviting readers to "get the facts" and linking to a page calling the president's claims "unsubstantiated."

www.cnbc.com

This was an attack on a twitter employee because he posted updated terms on the platform. Updating our Approach to Misleading Information
This was his post. Find the attack here that makes him "a hater"

View attachment 360034
What did she do?

Or she?
I could go on but you get the point.

Let’s start with Warren the. Ted Cruz.. can you prove trump attacked first?

Not how it works. You claimed Trump is NEVER the first to attack. I showed otherwise. So now it's your turn to prove that Warren attacked him first. It's your claim so you need to support it.

You didn’t prove it.. stop trolling

So now you are making other claims. Machado, Cruz and Roth all attacked Trump first? Fine substantiate that. I've shown you Trumps' attack now you need to be able to show a reason why. This is not trolling. Debates require people to substantiate their assertions. If you aren't able to don't blame me.

You brought it up,, I’m saying that trump DIDNT ATTACK warren first, you said he did prove it

How do you prove something didn't happen? The onus of proof is always on the one making the claim. I asserted that Trump attacked Warren and provided the video that showed him doing it. You claim he did it in response to an attack by Warren. The burden to prove that is yours. You also claimed the same for those other instances

In court, you don't ask someone to prove he didn't do something either right?

Everyone knows trump only responses to attacks. He would have no reason to respond to Warren at that time.. not sure he even knew who she was until she said something

"Everyone knows" is not a response. It's a logical fallacy YOU are claiming something, YOU support it. I could support my claims.

I’m just going off memory,, it was in response to her attack .. he never attacks first never

Your memory should be able to be substantiated right? We are talking about 2 high profile individuals. You have google find it. I'll make it easy. You have 4 different people I claimed Trump DID attack first. Find me the attack that according to you happened before for any of them.

If it wasn’t Blatantly obvious trump doesn’t attack first I would make an attempt.. but we all know he doesn’t.. what else do you have ??

If it is so blatantly obvious you shouldn't have to resort to these kinds of arguments

You the one that says he names calls lol only in response of an attack.. and Hes Devastatingly accurate with his strikes

She opened her mouth attacked him and he took her out

trump is never the first to attack

Who's making that claim again?

Huh

 

[forkup]

I have never seen blood thirsty group of people before.
they have went from fake news 24 hours a day to personal name-calling attacks 24 hours a day on President Trump.

when he wins in November they will de so defeated, how do you recover?

personal name-calling

They are the media. What's his excuse?

Do you have a point to make?

Yes, your problem with personal attacks seems to just apply to the media. When Trump does it, someone who I would assert has a larger impact on society you have no problem with it.

Trump only responds to attacks. You need to show respect not be a activist for the DNC.. if you can step down as A journalist

?
Oh can you show exactly what "attack" prompted "Pocahontas" or lying ted or basically any of them? Criticism is not an attack by the way.

You think trump attacked Liz Warren? I’m pretty sure it was a response to her incoherent rambling about trump. And ted did attack trump when he became the leader in the polls.

What name did she call him? What name did Ted Cruz call him?

I don't "think" he attacked her. I "saw" he attacked her.

She attacked him , he responded with her nick name that took her out

And yet you can't show me this attack. It's that simple. As I said your problems with personal attacks seem to be very conditional.

Why would trump ever bring up Warren? He had no reason. She opened her mouth attacked him and he took her out haha I love it.. trump is never the first to attack.. if you can prove it.. please do .. if not take a hike loser

Sure. I'll prove it.

Trump attacks Twitter employee while defending fact-checked tweets on mail-in ballots

Twitter had added warning tags to two of Trump's tweets about mail-in ballots, inviting readers to "get the facts" and linking to a page calling the president's claims "unsubstantiated."

www.cnbc.com

This was an attack on a twitter employee because he posted updated terms on the platform. Updating our Approach to Misleading Information
This was his post. Find the attack here that makes him "a hater"

View attachment 360034
What did she do?

Or she?
I could go on but you get the point.

Let’s start with Warren the. Ted Cruz.. can you prove trump attacked first?

Not how it works. You claimed Trump is NEVER the first to attack. I showed otherwise. So now it's your turn to prove that Warren attacked him first. It's your claim so you need to support it.

You didn’t prove it.. stop trolling

So now you are making other claims. Machado, Cruz and Roth all attacked Trump first? Fine substantiate that. I've shown you Trumps' attack now you need to be able to show a reason why. This is not trolling. Debates require people to substantiate their assertions. If you aren't able to don't blame me.

You brought it up,, I’m saying that trump DIDNT ATTACK warren first, you said he did prove it

How do you prove something didn't happen? The onus of proof is always on the one making the claim. I asserted that Trump attacked Warren and provided the video that showed him doing it. You claim he did it in response to an attack by Warren. The burden to prove that is yours. You also claimed the same for those other instances

In court, you don't ask someone to prove he didn't do something either right?

Everyone knows trump only responses to attacks. He would have no reason to respond to Warren at that time.. not sure he even knew who she was until she said something

"Everyone knows" is not a response. It's a logical fallacy YOU are claiming something, YOU support it. I could support my claims.

I’m just going off memory,, it was in response to her attack .. he never attacks first never

Your memory should be able to be substantiated right? We are talking about 2 high profile individuals. You have google find it. I'll make it easy. You have 4 different people I claimed Trump DID attack first. Find me the attack that according to you happened before for any of them.

If it wasn’t Blatantly obvious trump doesn’t attack first I would make an attempt.. but we all know he doesn’t.. what else do you have ??

If it is so blatantly obvious you shouldn't have to resort to these kinds of arguments

You the one that says he names calls lol only in response of an attack.. and Hes Devastatingly accurate with his strikes

She opened her mouth attacked him and he took her out

trump is never the first to attack

Who's making that claim again?

Huh

You the one that says he names calls lol only in response of an attack

You did write this right? At this point, I have to ask do you just throw stuff at the wall hoping it will stick? You claim to be able to go by memory, but from where I'm sitting you seem unable to remember what you wrote one post ago.

 

[Correll]

They

God I hope you are right. I still sometimes watch the reaction vids from 2016.

Did you watch Sunday nbc national news? Trump has killed thousands of ppl lol, he killing American soldiers, lol he’s a racist haha this is our National News haha

They only say those things because they are true.

A whole sentence with no baby talk. I am so proud of you. Was it hard?

 

[Bobob]

I have never seen blood thirsty group of people before.
they have went from fake news 24 hours a day to personal name-calling attacks 24 hours a day on President Trump.

when he wins in November they will de so defeated, how do you recover?

Name-calling? Trump is the master at name-calling. The only thing fake about the news to Trump is when the media holds Trump accountable. If the news favors Trump, it is great. If the news doesn't favor Trump, it is "fake". You people are so easily conned.

It’s all fake news.. first he’s a president of United States of America you don’t attack your own president.. just because you’re Maddie one get a life.. Your job is to report the news not be a political activist for the DNC

The president of the Untited States doesn't call his political opponents lying or sleepy or crooked or lazy-eyed. He doesn't attack the looks of the wife of his opponent or suggest his father was involved in the Kennedy assassination. Trump accuses Cruz's father of helping JFK's assassin

At least until Trump those were the norms.

So?

So, lamenting personal name-calling is about as hypocritical as it gets.

You canT prove he was the first to attack.

Of course, he was the first to attack if you watched the Republican debates. It was unnecessary and got me to thinkin' that this bozo was not prepared to debate and spent his time personally abusing his opponents rather than debating the issues.

It was a debate that means he responded to ted.. anything else?

That was certainly not a debate on the issues. He responded by changing the subject and getting personal to avoid debating. If you are ok with your guy being an asshole, then so be it.

What was he supposed to call her, Honest Hillary?

How about "Secretary of State" Clinton especially when a dishonest person is doing the labeling.

 

[Jitss617]

I have never seen blood thirsty group of people before.
they have went from fake news 24 hours a day to personal name-calling attacks 24 hours a day on President Trump.

when he wins in November they will de so defeated, how do you recover?

personal name-calling

They are the media. What's his excuse?

Do you have a point to make?

Yes, your problem with personal attacks seems to just apply to the media. When Trump does it, someone who I would assert has a larger impact on society you have no problem with it.

Trump only responds to attacks. You need to show respect not be a activist for the DNC.. if you can step down as A journalist

?
Oh can you show exactly what "attack" prompted "Pocahontas" or lying ted or basically any of them? Criticism is not an attack by the way.

You think trump attacked Liz Warren? I’m pretty sure it was a response to her incoherent rambling about trump. And ted did attack trump when he became the leader in the polls.

What name did she call him? What name did Ted Cruz call him?

I don't "think" he attacked her. I "saw" he attacked her.

She attacked him , he responded with her nick name that took her out

And yet you can't show me this attack. It's that simple. As I said your problems with personal attacks seem to be very conditional.

Why would trump ever bring up Warren? He had no reason. She opened her mouth attacked him and he took her out haha I love it.. trump is never the first to attack.. if you can prove it.. please do .. if not take a hike loser

Sure. I'll prove it.

Trump attacks Twitter employee while defending fact-checked tweets on mail-in ballots

Twitter had added warning tags to two of Trump's tweets about mail-in ballots, inviting readers to "get the facts" and linking to a page calling the president's claims "unsubstantiated."

www.cnbc.com

This was an attack on a twitter employee because he posted updated terms on the platform. Updating our Approach to Misleading Information
This was his post. Find the attack here that makes him "a hater"

View attachment 360034
What did she do?

Or she?
I could go on but you get the point.

Let’s start with Warren the. Ted Cruz.. can you prove trump attacked first?

Not how it works. You claimed Trump is NEVER the first to attack. I showed otherwise. So now it's your turn to prove that Warren attacked him first. It's your claim so you need to support it.

You didn’t prove it.. stop trolling

So now you are making other claims. Machado, Cruz and Roth all attacked Trump first? Fine substantiate that. I've shown you Trumps' attack now you need to be able to show a reason why. This is not trolling. Debates require people to substantiate their assertions. If you aren't able to don't blame me.

You brought it up,, I’m saying that trump DIDNT ATTACK warren first, you said he did prove it

How do you prove something didn't happen? The onus of proof is always on the one making the claim. I asserted that Trump attacked Warren and provided the video that showed him doing it. You claim he did it in response to an attack by Warren. The burden to prove that is yours. You also claimed the same for those other instances

In court, you don't ask someone to prove he didn't do something either right?

Everyone knows trump only responses to attacks. He would have no reason to respond to Warren at that time.. not sure he even knew who she was until she said something

"Everyone knows" is not a response. It's a logical fallacy YOU are claiming something, YOU support it. I could support my claims.

I’m just going off memory,, it was in response to her attack .. he never attacks first never

Your memory should be able to be substantiated right? We are talking about 2 high profile individuals. You have google find it. I'll make it easy. You have 4 different people I claimed Trump DID attack first. Find me the attack that according to you happened before for any of them.

If it wasn’t Blatantly obvious trump doesn’t attack first I would make an attempt.. but we all know he doesn’t.. what else do you have ??

If it is so blatantly obvious you shouldn't have to resort to these kinds of arguments

You the one that says he names calls lol only in response of an attack.. and Hes Devastatingly accurate with his strikes

She opened her mouth attacked him and he took her out

trump is never the first to attack

Who's making that claim again?

Huh

You the one that says he names calls lol only in response of an attack

You did write this right? At this point, I have to ask do you just throw stuff at the wall hoping it will stick? You claim to be able to go by memory, but from where I'm sitting you seem unable to remember what you wrote one post ago.

Stop trolling trump attacks when attacked

 

[forkup]

I have never seen blood thirsty group of people before.
they have went from fake news 24 hours a day to personal name-calling attacks 24 hours a day on President Trump.

when he wins in November they will de so defeated, how do you recover?

personal name-calling

They are the media. What's his excuse?

Do you have a point to make?

Yes, your problem with personal attacks seems to just apply to the media. When Trump does it, someone who I would assert has a larger impact on society you have no problem with it.

Trump only responds to attacks. You need to show respect not be a activist for the DNC.. if you can step down as A journalist

?
Oh can you show exactly what "attack" prompted "Pocahontas" or lying ted or basically any of them? Criticism is not an attack by the way.

You think trump attacked Liz Warren? I’m pretty sure it was a response to her incoherent rambling about trump. And ted did attack trump when he became the leader in the polls.

What name did she call him? What name did Ted Cruz call him?

I don't "think" he attacked her. I "saw" he attacked her.

She attacked him , he responded with her nick name that took her out

And yet you can't show me this attack. It's that simple. As I said your problems with personal attacks seem to be very conditional.

Why would trump ever bring up Warren? He had no reason. She opened her mouth attacked him and he took her out haha I love it.. trump is never the first to attack.. if you can prove it.. please do .. if not take a hike loser

Sure. I'll prove it.

Trump attacks Twitter employee while defending fact-checked tweets on mail-in ballots

Twitter had added warning tags to two of Trump's tweets about mail-in ballots, inviting readers to "get the facts" and linking to a page calling the president's claims "unsubstantiated."

www.cnbc.com

This was an attack on a twitter employee because he posted updated terms on the platform. Updating our Approach to Misleading Information
This was his post. Find the attack here that makes him "a hater"

View attachment 360034
What did she do?

Or she?
I could go on but you get the point.

Let’s start with Warren the. Ted Cruz.. can you prove trump attacked first?

Not how it works. You claimed Trump is NEVER the first to attack. I showed otherwise. So now it's your turn to prove that Warren attacked him first. It's your claim so you need to support it.

You didn’t prove it.. stop trolling

So now you are making other claims. Machado, Cruz and Roth all attacked Trump first? Fine substantiate that. I've shown you Trumps' attack now you need to be able to show a reason why. This is not trolling. Debates require people to substantiate their assertions. If you aren't able to don't blame me.

You brought it up,, I’m saying that trump DIDNT ATTACK warren first, you said he did prove it

How do you prove something didn't happen? The onus of proof is always on the one making the claim. I asserted that Trump attacked Warren and provided the video that showed him doing it. You claim he did it in response to an attack by Warren. The burden to prove that is yours. You also claimed the same for those other instances

In court, you don't ask someone to prove he didn't do something either right?

Everyone knows trump only responses to attacks. He would have no reason to respond to Warren at that time.. not sure he even knew who she was until she said something

"Everyone knows" is not a response. It's a logical fallacy YOU are claiming something, YOU support it. I could support my claims.

I’m just going off memory,, it was in response to her attack .. he never attacks first never

Your memory should be able to be substantiated right? We are talking about 2 high profile individuals. You have google find it. I'll make it easy. You have 4 different people I claimed Trump DID attack first. Find me the attack that according to you happened before for any of them.

If it wasn’t Blatantly obvious trump doesn’t attack first I would make an attempt.. but we all know he doesn’t.. what else do you have ??

If it is so blatantly obvious you shouldn't have to resort to these kinds of arguments

You the one that says he names calls lol only in response of an attack.. and Hes Devastatingly accurate with his strikes

She opened her mouth attacked him and he took her out

trump is never the first to attack

Who's making that claim again?

Huh

You the one that says he names calls lol only in response of an attack

You did write this right? At this point, I have to ask do you just throw stuff at the wall hoping it will stick? You claim to be able to go by memory, but from where I'm sitting you seem unable to remember what you wrote one post ago.

Stop trolling trump attacks when attacked

Stop asserting stuff you are unable to back up.

 

[Jitss617]

I have never seen blood thirsty group of people before.
they have went from fake news 24 hours a day to personal name-calling attacks 24 hours a day on President Trump.

when he wins in November they will de so defeated, how do you recover?

personal name-calling

They are the media. What's his excuse?

Do you have a point to make?

Yes, your problem with personal attacks seems to just apply to the media. When Trump does it, someone who I would assert has a larger impact on society you have no problem with it.

Trump only responds to attacks. You need to show respect not be a activist for the DNC.. if you can step down as A journalist

?
Oh can you show exactly what "attack" prompted "Pocahontas" or lying ted or basically any of them? Criticism is not an attack by the way.

You think trump attacked Liz Warren? I’m pretty sure it was a response to her incoherent rambling about trump. And ted did attack trump when he became the leader in the polls.

What name did she call him? What name did Ted Cruz call him?

I don't "think" he attacked her. I "saw" he attacked her.

She attacked him , he responded with her nick name that took her out

And yet you can't show me this attack. It's that simple. As I said your problems with personal attacks seem to be very conditional.

Why would trump ever bring up Warren? He had no reason. She opened her mouth attacked him and he took her out haha I love it.. trump is never the first to attack.. if you can prove it.. please do .. if not take a hike loser

Sure. I'll prove it.

Trump attacks Twitter employee while defending fact-checked tweets on mail-in ballots

Twitter had added warning tags to two of Trump's tweets about mail-in ballots, inviting readers to "get the facts" and linking to a page calling the president's claims "unsubstantiated."

www.cnbc.com

This was an attack on a twitter employee because he posted updated terms on the platform. Updating our Approach to Misleading Information
This was his post. Find the attack here that makes him "a hater"

View attachment 360034
What did she do?

Or she?
I could go on but you get the point.

Let’s start with Warren the. Ted Cruz.. can you prove trump attacked first?

Not how it works. You claimed Trump is NEVER the first to attack. I showed otherwise. So now it's your turn to prove that Warren attacked him first. It's your claim so you need to support it.

You didn’t prove it.. stop trolling

So now you are making other claims. Machado, Cruz and Roth all attacked Trump first? Fine substantiate that. I've shown you Trumps' attack now you need to be able to show a reason why. This is not trolling. Debates require people to substantiate their assertions. If you aren't able to don't blame me.

You brought it up,, I’m saying that trump DIDNT ATTACK warren first, you said he did prove it

How do you prove something didn't happen? The onus of proof is always on the one making the claim. I asserted that Trump attacked Warren and provided the video that showed him doing it. You claim he did it in response to an attack by Warren. The burden to prove that is yours. You also claimed the same for those other instances

In court, you don't ask someone to prove he didn't do something either right?

Everyone knows trump only responses to attacks. He would have no reason to respond to Warren at that time.. not sure he even knew who she was until she said something

"Everyone knows" is not a response. It's a logical fallacy YOU are claiming something, YOU support it. I could support my claims.

I’m just going off memory,, it was in response to her attack .. he never attacks first never

Your memory should be able to be substantiated right? We are talking about 2 high profile individuals. You have google find it. I'll make it easy. You have 4 different people I claimed Trump DID attack first. Find me the attack that according to you happened before for any of them.

If it wasn’t Blatantly obvious trump doesn’t attack first I would make an attempt.. but we all know he doesn’t.. what else do you have ??

If it is so blatantly obvious you shouldn't have to resort to these kinds of arguments

You the one that says he names calls lol only in response of an attack.. and Hes Devastatingly accurate with his strikes

She opened her mouth attacked him and he took her out

trump is never the first to attack

Who's making that claim again?

Huh

You the one that says he names calls lol only in response of an attack

You did write this right? At this point, I have to ask do you just throw stuff at the wall hoping it will stick? You claim to be able to go by memory, but from where I'm sitting you seem unable to remember what you wrote one post ago.

Stop trolling trump attacks when attacked

Stop asserting stuff you are unable to back up.

Ask anyone here trump
Doesn’t attack .. just deal with reality

 

[forkup]

I have never seen blood thirsty group of people before.
they have went from fake news 24 hours a day to personal name-calling attacks 24 hours a day on President Trump.

when he wins in November they will de so defeated, how do you recover?

personal name-calling

They are the media. What's his excuse?

Do you have a point to make?

Yes, your problem with personal attacks seems to just apply to the media. When Trump does it, someone who I would assert has a larger impact on society you have no problem with it.

Trump only responds to attacks. You need to show respect not be a activist for the DNC.. if you can step down as A journalist

?
Oh can you show exactly what "attack" prompted "Pocahontas" or lying ted or basically any of them? Criticism is not an attack by the way.

You think trump attacked Liz Warren? I’m pretty sure it was a response to her incoherent rambling about trump. And ted did attack trump when he became the leader in the polls.

What name did she call him? What name did Ted Cruz call him?

I don't "think" he attacked her. I "saw" he attacked her.

She attacked him , he responded with her nick name that took her out

And yet you can't show me this attack. It's that simple. As I said your problems with personal attacks seem to be very conditional.

Why would trump ever bring up Warren? He had no reason. She opened her mouth attacked him and he took her out haha I love it.. trump is never the first to attack.. if you can prove it.. please do .. if not take a hike loser

Sure. I'll prove it.

Trump attacks Twitter employee while defending fact-checked tweets on mail-in ballots

Twitter had added warning tags to two of Trump's tweets about mail-in ballots, inviting readers to "get the facts" and linking to a page calling the president's claims "unsubstantiated."

www.cnbc.com

This was an attack on a twitter employee because he posted updated terms on the platform. Updating our Approach to Misleading Information
This was his post. Find the attack here that makes him "a hater"

View attachment 360034
What did she do?

Or she?
I could go on but you get the point.

Let’s start with Warren the. Ted Cruz.. can you prove trump attacked first?

Not how it works. You claimed Trump is NEVER the first to attack. I showed otherwise. So now it's your turn to prove that Warren attacked him first. It's your claim so you need to support it.

You didn’t prove it.. stop trolling

So now you are making other claims. Machado, Cruz and Roth all attacked Trump first? Fine substantiate that. I've shown you Trumps' attack now you need to be able to show a reason why. This is not trolling. Debates require people to substantiate their assertions. If you aren't able to don't blame me.

You brought it up,, I’m saying that trump DIDNT ATTACK warren first, you said he did prove it

How do you prove something didn't happen? The onus of proof is always on the one making the claim. I asserted that Trump attacked Warren and provided the video that showed him doing it. You claim he did it in response to an attack by Warren. The burden to prove that is yours. You also claimed the same for those other instances

In court, you don't ask someone to prove he didn't do something either right?

Everyone knows trump only responses to attacks. He would have no reason to respond to Warren at that time.. not sure he even knew who she was until she said something

"Everyone knows" is not a response. It's a logical fallacy YOU are claiming something, YOU support it. I could support my claims.

I’m just going off memory,, it was in response to her attack .. he never attacks first never

Your memory should be able to be substantiated right? We are talking about 2 high profile individuals. You have google find it. I'll make it easy. You have 4 different people I claimed Trump DID attack first. Find me the attack that according to you happened before for any of them.

If it wasn’t Blatantly obvious trump doesn’t attack first I would make an attempt.. but we all know he doesn’t.. what else do you have ??

If it is so blatantly obvious you shouldn't have to resort to these kinds of arguments

You the one that says he names calls lol only in response of an attack.. and Hes Devastatingly accurate with his strikes

She opened her mouth attacked him and he took her out

trump is never the first to attack

Who's making that claim again?

Huh

You the one that says he names calls lol only in response of an attack

You did write this right? At this point, I have to ask do you just throw stuff at the wall hoping it will stick? You claim to be able to go by memory, but from where I'm sitting you seem unable to remember what you wrote one post ago.

Stop trolling trump attacks when attacked

Stop asserting stuff you are unable to back up.

Ask anyone here trump
Doesn’t attack .. just deal with reality

Of course, he was the first to attack if you watched the Republican debates.

Just did. Another failed assertion.

 

[Jitss617]

I have never seen blood thirsty group of people before.
they have went from fake news 24 hours a day to personal name-calling attacks 24 hours a day on President Trump.

when he wins in November they will de so defeated, how do you recover?

personal name-calling

They are the media. What's his excuse?

Do you have a point to make?

Yes, your problem with personal attacks seems to just apply to the media. When Trump does it, someone who I would assert has a larger impact on society you have no problem with it.

Trump only responds to attacks. You need to show respect not be a activist for the DNC.. if you can step down as A journalist

?
Oh can you show exactly what "attack" prompted "Pocahontas" or lying ted or basically any of them? Criticism is not an attack by the way.

You think trump attacked Liz Warren? I’m pretty sure it was a response to her incoherent rambling about trump. And ted did attack trump when he became the leader in the polls.

What name did she call him? What name did Ted Cruz call him?

I don't "think" he attacked her. I "saw" he attacked her.

She attacked him , he responded with her nick name that took her out

And yet you can't show me this attack. It's that simple. As I said your problems with personal attacks seem to be very conditional.

Why would trump ever bring up Warren? He had no reason. She opened her mouth attacked him and he took her out haha I love it.. trump is never the first to attack.. if you can prove it.. please do .. if not take a hike loser

Sure. I'll prove it.

Trump attacks Twitter employee while defending fact-checked tweets on mail-in ballots

Twitter had added warning tags to two of Trump's tweets about mail-in ballots, inviting readers to "get the facts" and linking to a page calling the president's claims "unsubstantiated."

www.cnbc.com

This was an attack on a twitter employee because he posted updated terms on the platform. Updating our Approach to Misleading Information
This was his post. Find the attack here that makes him "a hater"

View attachment 360034
What did she do?

Or she?
I could go on but you get the point.

Let’s start with Warren the. Ted Cruz.. can you prove trump attacked first?

Not how it works. You claimed Trump is NEVER the first to attack. I showed otherwise. So now it's your turn to prove that Warren attacked him first. It's your claim so you need to support it.

You didn’t prove it.. stop trolling

So now you are making other claims. Machado, Cruz and Roth all attacked Trump first? Fine substantiate that. I've shown you Trumps' attack now you need to be able to show a reason why. This is not trolling. Debates require people to substantiate their assertions. If you aren't able to don't blame me.

You brought it up,, I’m saying that trump DIDNT ATTACK warren first, you said he did prove it

How do you prove something didn't happen? The onus of proof is always on the one making the claim. I asserted that Trump attacked Warren and provided the video that showed him doing it. You claim he did it in response to an attack by Warren. The burden to prove that is yours. You also claimed the same for those other instances

In court, you don't ask someone to prove he didn't do something either right?

Everyone knows trump only responses to attacks. He would have no reason to respond to Warren at that time.. not sure he even knew who she was until she said something

"Everyone knows" is not a response. It's a logical fallacy YOU are claiming something, YOU support it. I could support my claims.

I’m just going off memory,, it was in response to her attack .. he never attacks first never

Your memory should be able to be substantiated right? We are talking about 2 high profile individuals. You have google find it. I'll make it easy. You have 4 different people I claimed Trump DID attack first. Find me the attack that according to you happened before for any of them.

If it wasn’t Blatantly obvious trump doesn’t attack first I would make an attempt.. but we all know he doesn’t.. what else do you have ??

If it is so blatantly obvious you shouldn't have to resort to these kinds of arguments

You the one that says he names calls lol only in response of an attack.. and Hes Devastatingly accurate with his strikes

She opened her mouth attacked him and he took her out

trump is never the first to attack

Who's making that claim again?

Huh

You the one that says he names calls lol only in response of an attack

You did write this right? At this point, I have to ask do you just throw stuff at the wall hoping it will stick? You claim to be able to go by memory, but from where I'm sitting you seem unable to remember what you wrote one post ago.

Stop trolling trump attacks when attacked

Stop asserting stuff you are unable to back up.

Ask anyone here trump
Doesn’t attack .. just deal with reality

Of course, he was the first to attack if you watched the Republican debates.

Just did. Another failed assertion.

I see no proof sorry