How MAGA Is Already Justifying The Use Of Military Force At Home If Trump Wins

Yet across the nation and at their "rallies", "protests", and riots/insurrections we frequently and near always saw their emblem;
300px-Antifa_logo.svg.png


May not be "universally organized" as in "dues paying, membership card carrying"; but do have common ideology and methods and also a form of communications network that co-ordinates actions and handles logistics of gathering in from outlying locales.

As for "typical rightwing militia units" these are even less "universally organized than the AntiFa Movement. The tend to be more localized and per your Leftwing propaganda organization, seem to be on the decline;

The militia movement in transition | Southern Poverty Law Center

Also, appears the term/label "militia" is being disused since it is a trigger word for the government law enforcement agencies involved in lawfare.
One local example in my state;
EXCERT:
...
A1: Antifa is a contraction of the phrase “anti-fascist.” It refers to a decentralized network of far-left militants that oppose what they believe are fascist, racist, or otherwise right-wing extremists. While some consider Antifa a sub-set of anarchists, adherents frequently blend anarchist and communist views. One of the most common symbols used by Antifa combines the red flag of the 1917 Russian Revolution and the black flag of 19th century anarchists. Antifa groups frequently conduct counter-protests to disrupt far-right gatherings and rallies. They often organize in black blocs (ad hoc gatherings of individuals that wear black clothing, ski masks, scarves, sunglasses, and other material to conceal their faces), use improvised explosive devices and other homemade weapons, and resort to vandalism. In addition, Antifa members organize their activities through social media, encrypted peer-to-peer networks, and encrypted messaging services such as Signal.

Antifa groups have been increasingly active in protests and rallies over the past few years, especially ones that include far-right participants. In June 2016, for example, Antifa and other protestors confronted a neo-Nazi rally in Sacramento, California, with at least five people stabbed. In February, March, and April 2017, Antifa members attacked alt-right demonstrators at the University of California, Berkeley using bricks, pipes, hammers, and homemade incendiary devices. In July 2019, William Van Spronsen, a self-proclaimed Antifa, attempted to bomb the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention facility in Tacoma, Washington, using a propane tank but was killed by police.

Like some other types of domestic extremists in the United States, Antifa follow a decentralized organizational structure. In an influential article in the 1992 edition of the magazine Seditionist, anti-government activist Louis R. Beam advocated an organizational structure that he termed “leaderless resistance.” As Beam noted, “Utilizing the Leaderless Resistance concept, all individuals and groups operate independently of each other, and never report to a central headquarters or single leader for direction or instruction, as would those who belong to a typical pyramid organization.” Beam argued that the tactic was just as useful for left-wing as it was for right-wing extremists. “The New American Patriot,” he wrote several years later, “will be neither left nor right, just a freeman fighting for liberty.” Leaderless resistance became a useful model for many types of extremists, including far-left networks like Antifa.
...
 
Yet across the nation and at their "rallies", "protests", and riots/insurrections we frequently and near always saw their emblem;
300px-Antifa_logo.svg.png


May not be "universally organized" as in "dues paying, membership card carrying"; but do have common ideology and methods and also a form of communications network that co-ordinates actions and handles logistics of gathering in from outlying locales.

As for "typical rightwing militia units" these are even less "universally organized than the AntiFa Movement. The tend to be more localized and per your Leftwing propaganda organization, seem to be on the decline;

The militia movement in transition | Southern Poverty Law Center

Also, appears the term/label "militia" is being disused since it is a trigger word for the government law enforcement agencies involved in lawfare.
One local example in my state;

That is made up MAGA crap.
 
Many MAGA influencers have an apocalyptic story to tell about the country, the political divide, and where we’re all headed, and they’re already using it to lay the groundwork for crossing what has long been a red line: deploying the military for domestic law enforcement purposes.

In this MAGA fever dream, everyone has their part to play. They believe that they’ll be caught up in it; you might be, too. It goes something like this: If Donald Trump wins in November, people will protest. Riots will break out. The left, they theorize, will go all-out to stoke organized violence around the country, clearing the way for a newly inaugurated Trump administration to step in and make unprecedented, widespread use of the U.S. military to restore law and order.

This dark vision of the future draws on deeply pessimistic theorizing, on lectures about Marxist anti-government ideology seemingly ripped from the Cold War, on memories of the Black Lives Matter protests in 2020, and on claims that Democrats and the left will be unable to accept a Trump victory. It all comes against the backdrop of senior officials around Trump and Trump himself reportedly having been eager to invoke the Insurrection Act while he was in office, and mulling its actual use if he’s re-elected.

https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/...e-use-of-military-force-at-home-if-trump-wins

He will take whatever extralegal steps he needs to take in order to suppress protests against him. Something there's no need to speculate about. He's already planning on it.

Trump hints at expanded role for the military within the US. A legacy law gives him few guardrails

He didn't but it would serve you commies right!
 
He didn't but it would serve you commies right!
He did, but you won't because if you did, we would clean you up for good.

Somebody's going to lose. If they have complaints, they have only one avenue, the courts.
 
He did, but you won't because if you did, we would clean you up for good.

Somebody's going to lose. If they have complaints, they have only one avenue, the courts.
Just exactly how would you clean me up for good, and what exactly does that mean, is that some sort of fascist threat? You come after me it will not go well I am fully prepared
 
But never before has a presidential nominee — let alone a former president — openly suggested turning the military on American citizens simply because they oppose his candidacy. As he escalates his threats of political retribution, Mr. Trump is offering voters the choice of a very different, and far less democratic, form of American government.

“There is not a case in American history where a presidential candidate has run for office on a promise that they would exact retribution against anyone they perceive as not supporting them in the campaign,” said Ian Bassin, a former associate White House counsel under Barack Obama who leads the advocacy group Protect Democracy. “It’s so fundamentally, outrageously beyond the pale of how this country has worked that it’s hard to articulate how insane it is.”


The debate over whether trump has authoritarian impulses is over. So too is the debate over whether The Following shares those impulses.

The only question remaining is whether there are enough of us to keep the country from lurching towards the kind of fascist state trump has outlined. One where dissenters against the regime risk being imprisoned.
 
Biden plans on using the military to keep Trump from taking back the WH.

He may be in for a shock when he asks them to shoot at their fellow citizens and Patriots
 
Anyone who goes back to the first responses to the thread by trumples will see their vehement denials of the premise. Now trump is quite out in the open about it.

The problem isn't trump spewing fascist dictums. The problem is he doesn't lose support when he does. Leaving no other possible conclusion other than Repubs welcome fascism.
 
Biden plans on using the military to keep Trump from taking back the WH.

He may be in for a shock when he asks them to shoot at their fellow citizens and Patriots
Have you had these delusions for a long time?

As noted above

The debate as to whether Trump wants to be an authoritarian is over . He’s made it clear.

The debate is over whether his minions want him to be an authoritarian.

They clearly do
 
He did, but you won't because if you did, we would clean you up for good.

Somebody's going to lose. If they have complaints, they have only one avenue, the courts.

Who do you think "we" is?
 
Anyone who goes back to the first responses to the thread by trumples will see their vehement denials of the premise. Now trump is quite out in the open about it.

The problem isn't trump spewing fascist dictums. The problem is he doesn't lose support when he does. Leaving no other possible conclusion other than Repubs welcome fascism.

I would definitely support fascism under the leadership of President Trump45/47 than the type of fascism that we are seeing with The Democratic Party.

The problem is that President Trump 45/47 will never do that.

He had the perfect chance to do that during Covid, yet he ejected it at every turn, even while Democrats were 100% behind their own Fascism.

It is simply another case of The Left making something up, inserting it into their echo chamber and having the Berg's of that echo chamber cult repeat it, over and over, and over.
 
Have you had these delusions for a long time?

As noted above

The debate as to whether Trump wants to be an authoritarian is over . He’s made it clear.

The debate is over whether his minions want him to be an authoritarian.

They clearly do

I would definitely support fascism under the leadership of President Trump45/47 than the type of fascism that we are seeing with The Democratic Party.

The problem is that President Trump 45/47 will never do that.

He had the perfect chance to do that during Covid, yet he ejected it at every turn, even while Democrats were 100% behind their own Fascism.

It is simply another case of The Left making something up, inserting it into their echo chamber and having the Berg's Leshs of that echo chamber cult repeat it, over and over, and over.
 
It is simply another case of The Left making something up, inserting it into their echo chamber and having the Berg's Leshs of that echo chamber cult repeat it, over and over, and over.
The best way to figure out what the Democrats are doing, or would like to do, is to listen to the accusations they levy at Republicans.
 
I would definitely support fascism under the leadership of President Trump45/47 than the type of fascism that we are seeing with The Democratic Party.

The problem is that President Trump 45/47 will never do that.

He had the perfect chance to do that during Covid, yet he ejected it at every turn, even while Democrats were 100% behind their own Fascism.

It is simply another case of The Left making something up, inserting it into their echo chamber and having the Berg's Leshs of that echo chamber cult repeat it, over and over, and over.
See folks?

They WANT a dictator
 
Back
Top Bottom