House votes to create sexual deviant rights and violates constitutional limitations

[bodecea]

I don’t support any discrimination or public accommodation laws, but the idea this act will allow civil rights for pedos is nothing more than scaremongering by silly retards.

Actually, the idea this act will allow civil rights for pedos shows that those talking of it are UNABLE TO DISTINGUISH between legal acts between consenting adults and illegal and predatory acts against those who cannot consent and need to be kept from children and animals.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

.

See House approves sweeping bill to expand gay rights

5/17/2019

“WASHINGTON — Democrats in the House approved sweeping anti-discrimination legislation Friday that would extend civil rights protections to LGBT people by prohibiting discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity. The protections would extend to employment, housing, loan applications, education, public accommodations and other areas.”

Well, if you are one who supports and defends our constitutionally limited system of government, and also support our federal constitution’s amendment process to accommodate change for alleged changing times, the Democrat controlled House has confirmed today it is more than willing to usurp powers not granted, and unwilling to be tied to observing our Constitution’s amendment process to gain consent of the governed prior to exercising new legislative powers.

The truth is, the proposed “Equality Act” as it is called, has nothing to do with equality, and everything to do with creating, under law, a privileged sexually deviant class with the government’s muscle behind it. Keep in mind, when the same type of legislation was advanced as a constitutional amendment in the 1980s ___ the Equal Rights Amendment ___ it was rejected by the people of the United States, and for good cause, as it would open a Pandora's Box with countless unintended consequences both disruptive and dangerous. In fact, if adopted, the Equality Act would subvert the people’s right to mutually agree in their contracts and associations which are both inalienable rights of mankind.

And here we are again, but this time the Democrat control House has decided to ignore our Constitution’s required amendment process, and has simply passed legislation usurping a legislative power not granted ____ a legislative power actually rejected when the Equal Rights amendment was defeated in the 1980s.

JWK

"If the Constitution was ratified under the belief, sedulously propagated on all sides that such protection was afforded, [our constitution’s amendment process] would it not now be a fraud upon the whole people to give a different construction to its powers?"___ Justice Story

If those afflicted could trust the generosity of the Christian nation then no codicils would be necessary, yet, that has not been the case with people in the USA and their inability to "naturally" treat people that are different equally..

Going by the OP's so-called "trust" in people...we wouldn't even need the Bill of Rights, would we?

You don’t have a right to demand special treatment because you’re too mentally unstable to figure out what sex you are.

 

[bodecea]

How long before the SJW crowd insists you have a faggot, a tranny and a pedophile in your employ to make you versification enough to get by?

You are unable to distinguish......are you?

 

[idb]

I don’t support any discrimination or public accommodation laws, but the idea this act will allow civil rights for pedos is nothing more than scaremongering by silly retards.

It's the same hysteria that screamed that same-sex marriage will lead to people marrying their lawnmowers.

 

[bodecea]

.

See House approves sweeping bill to expand gay rights

5/17/2019

“WASHINGTON — Democrats in the House approved sweeping anti-discrimination legislation Friday that would extend civil rights protections to LGBT people by prohibiting discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity. The protections would extend to employment, housing, loan applications, education, public accommodations and other areas.”

Well, if you are one who supports and defends our constitutionally limited system of government, and also support our federal constitution’s amendment process to accommodate change for alleged changing times, the Democrat controlled House has confirmed today it is more than willing to usurp powers not granted, and unwilling to be tied to observing our Constitution’s amendment process to gain consent of the governed prior to exercising new legislative powers.

The truth is, the proposed “Equality Act” as it is called, has nothing to do with equality, and everything to do with creating, under law, a privileged sexually deviant class with the government’s muscle behind it. Keep in mind, when the same type of legislation was advanced as a constitutional amendment in the 1980s ___ the Equal Rights Amendment ___ it was rejected by the people of the United States, and for good cause, as it would open a Pandora's Box with countless unintended consequences both disruptive and dangerous. In fact, if adopted, the Equality Act would subvert the people’s right to mutually agree in their contracts and associations which are both inalienable rights of mankind.

And here we are again, but this time the Democrat control House has decided to ignore our Constitution’s required amendment process, and has simply passed legislation usurping a legislative power not granted ____ a legislative power actually rejected when the Equal Rights amendment was defeated in the 1980s.

JWK

"If the Constitution was ratified under the belief, sedulously propagated on all sides that such protection was afforded, [our constitution’s amendment process] would it not now be a fraud upon the whole people to give a different construction to its powers?"___ Justice Story

If those afflicted could trust the generosity of the Christian nation then no codicils would be necessary, yet, that has not been the case with people in the USA and their inability to "naturally" treat people that are different equally..

Going by the OP's so-called "trust" in people...we wouldn't even need the Bill of Rights, would we?

You don’t have a right to demand special treatment because you’re too mentally unstable to figure out what sex you are.

I know perfectly well what sex (gender) I am....and I have one more advantage over such as yourself. I can clearly distinguish between those who consent between adults and the predators who assault children and animals.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

I don’t support any discrimination or public accommodation laws, but the idea this act will allow civil rights for pedos is nothing more than scaremongering by silly retards.

Actually, the idea this act will allow civil rights for pedos shows that those talking of it are UNABLE TO DISTINGUISH between legal acts between consenting adults and illegal and predatory acts against those who cannot consent and need to be kept from children and animals.

Thank you. You are correct. These trans psychos can’t be near children, animals or a job serving the public.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

.

See House approves sweeping bill to expand gay rights

5/17/2019

“WASHINGTON — Democrats in the House approved sweeping anti-discrimination legislation Friday that would extend civil rights protections to LGBT people by prohibiting discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity. The protections would extend to employment, housing, loan applications, education, public accommodations and other areas.”

Well, if you are one who supports and defends our constitutionally limited system of government, and also support our federal constitution’s amendment process to accommodate change for alleged changing times, the Democrat controlled House has confirmed today it is more than willing to usurp powers not granted, and unwilling to be tied to observing our Constitution’s amendment process to gain consent of the governed prior to exercising new legislative powers.

The truth is, the proposed “Equality Act” as it is called, has nothing to do with equality, and everything to do with creating, under law, a privileged sexually deviant class with the government’s muscle behind it. Keep in mind, when the same type of legislation was advanced as a constitutional amendment in the 1980s ___ the Equal Rights Amendment ___ it was rejected by the people of the United States, and for good cause, as it would open a Pandora's Box with countless unintended consequences both disruptive and dangerous. In fact, if adopted, the Equality Act would subvert the people’s right to mutually agree in their contracts and associations which are both inalienable rights of mankind.

And here we are again, but this time the Democrat control House has decided to ignore our Constitution’s required amendment process, and has simply passed legislation usurping a legislative power not granted ____ a legislative power actually rejected when the Equal Rights amendment was defeated in the 1980s.

JWK

"If the Constitution was ratified under the belief, sedulously propagated on all sides that such protection was afforded, [our constitution’s amendment process] would it not now be a fraud upon the whole people to give a different construction to its powers?"___ Justice Story

If those afflicted could trust the generosity of the Christian nation then no codicils would be necessary, yet, that has not been the case with people in the USA and their inability to "naturally" treat people that are different equally..

Going by the OP's so-called "trust" in people...we wouldn't even need the Bill of Rights, would we?

You don’t have a right to demand special treatment because you’re too mentally unstable to figure out what sex you are.

I know perfectly well what sex (gender) I am....and I have one more advantage over such as yourself. I can clearly distinguish between those who consent between adults and the predators who assault children and animals.

Do you support ten year olds being celebrated as trans? Do you support doctors performing surgery and medication on those under 18 to become the other sex? Do you believe in more than two genders?

 

[bodecea]

I don’t support any discrimination or public accommodation laws, but the idea this act will allow civil rights for pedos is nothing more than scaremongering by silly retards.

Actually, the idea this act will allow civil rights for pedos shows that those talking of it are UNABLE TO DISTINGUISH between legal acts between consenting adults and illegal and predatory acts against those who cannot consent and need to be kept from children and animals.

Thank you. You are correct. These trans psychos can’t be near children, animals or a job serving the public.

WE are not the ones showing the clear inability to distinguish between legal actions between consenting adults..................and the taking advantage of children and animals...neither of which can consent.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

How long before the SJW crowd insists you have a faggot, a tranny and a pedophile in your employ to make you versification enough to get by?

You are unable to distinguish......are you?

I don’t seem to be the one unable to identify. You’re the one telling being unable to do so is normal.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

I don’t support any discrimination or public accommodation laws, but the idea this act will allow civil rights for pedos is nothing more than scaremongering by silly retards.

Actually, the idea this act will allow civil rights for pedos shows that those talking of it are UNABLE TO DISTINGUISH between legal acts between consenting adults and illegal and predatory acts against those who cannot consent and need to be kept from children and animals.

Thank you. You are correct. These trans psychos can’t be near children, animals or a job serving the public.

WE are not the ones showing the clear inability to distinguish between legal actions between consenting adults..................and the taking advantage of children and animals...neither of which can consent.

YOU are the ones in favor of passing laws that do just that.

 

[bodecea]

.

See House approves sweeping bill to expand gay rights

5/17/2019

“WASHINGTON — Democrats in the House approved sweeping anti-discrimination legislation Friday that would extend civil rights protections to LGBT people by prohibiting discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity. The protections would extend to employment, housing, loan applications, education, public accommodations and other areas.”

Well, if you are one who supports and defends our constitutionally limited system of government, and also support our federal constitution’s amendment process to accommodate change for alleged changing times, the Democrat controlled House has confirmed today it is more than willing to usurp powers not granted, and unwilling to be tied to observing our Constitution’s amendment process to gain consent of the governed prior to exercising new legislative powers.

The truth is, the proposed “Equality Act” as it is called, has nothing to do with equality, and everything to do with creating, under law, a privileged sexually deviant class with the government’s muscle behind it. Keep in mind, when the same type of legislation was advanced as a constitutional amendment in the 1980s ___ the Equal Rights Amendment ___ it was rejected by the people of the United States, and for good cause, as it would open a Pandora's Box with countless unintended consequences both disruptive and dangerous. In fact, if adopted, the Equality Act would subvert the people’s right to mutually agree in their contracts and associations which are both inalienable rights of mankind.

And here we are again, but this time the Democrat control House has decided to ignore our Constitution’s required amendment process, and has simply passed legislation usurping a legislative power not granted ____ a legislative power actually rejected when the Equal Rights amendment was defeated in the 1980s.

JWK

"If the Constitution was ratified under the belief, sedulously propagated on all sides that such protection was afforded, [our constitution’s amendment process] would it not now be a fraud upon the whole people to give a different construction to its powers?"___ Justice Story

If those afflicted could trust the generosity of the Christian nation then no codicils would be necessary, yet, that has not been the case with people in the USA and their inability to "naturally" treat people that are different equally..

Going by the OP's so-called "trust" in people...we wouldn't even need the Bill of Rights, would we?

You don’t have a right to demand special treatment because you’re too mentally unstable to figure out what sex you are.

I know perfectly well what sex (gender) I am....and I have one more advantage over such as yourself. I can clearly distinguish between those who consent between adults and the predators who assault children and animals.

Do you support ten year olds being celebrated as trans? Do you support doctors performing surgery and medication on those under 18 to become the other sex? Do you believe in more than two genders?

For your first question...I do not. As for the second....I am not a doctor....unlike CRCs I am not in a position to take medical decisions away from those who went to medical school...As for more than two genders...that's a fact.....

 

[bodecea]

I don’t support any discrimination or public accommodation laws, but the idea this act will allow civil rights for pedos is nothing more than scaremongering by silly retards.

Actually, the idea this act will allow civil rights for pedos shows that those talking of it are UNABLE TO DISTINGUISH between legal acts between consenting adults and illegal and predatory acts against those who cannot consent and need to be kept from children and animals.

Thank you. You are correct. These trans psychos can’t be near children, animals or a job serving the public.

WE are not the ones showing the clear inability to distinguish between legal actions between consenting adults..................and the taking advantage of children and animals...neither of which can consent.

YOU are the ones in favor of passing laws that do just that.

Not in any way....I can tell the difference. I am able to distinguish.....you, not so much. Let us also take a moment to consider who sexually abuses children the most....hetero males.

 

[beautress]

.

See House approves sweeping bill to expand gay rights

5/17/2019

“WASHINGTON — Democrats in the House approved sweeping anti-discrimination legislation Friday that would extend civil rights protections to LGBT people by prohibiting discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity. The protections would extend to employment, housing, loan applications, education, public accommodations and other areas.”

Well, if you are one who supports and defends our constitutionally limited system of government, and also support our federal constitution’s amendment process to accommodate change for alleged changing times, the Democrat controlled House has confirmed today it is more than willing to usurp powers not granted, and unwilling to be tied to observing our Constitution’s amendment process to gain consent of the governed prior to exercising new legislative powers.

The truth is, the proposed “Equality Act” as it is called, has nothing to do with equality, and everything to do with creating, under law, a privileged sexually deviant class with the government’s muscle behind it. Keep in mind, when the same type of legislation was advanced as a constitutional amendment in the 1980s ___ the Equal Rights Amendment ___ it was rejected by the people of the United States, and for good cause, as it would open a Pandora's Box with countless unintended consequences both disruptive and dangerous. In fact, if adopted, the Equality Act would subvert the people’s right to mutually agree in their contracts and associations which are both inalienable rights of mankind.

And here we are again, but this time the Democrat control House has decided to ignore our Constitution’s required amendment process, and has simply passed legislation usurping a legislative power not granted ____ a legislative power actually rejected when the Equal Rights amendment was defeated in the 1980s.

JWK

"If the Constitution was ratified under the belief, sedulously propagated on all sides that such protection was afforded, [our constitution’s amendment process] would it not now be a fraud upon the whole people to give a different construction to its powers?"___ Justice Story

So let me get this straight (ha)

After 175 or so years of folks enslaving others and forcing peeps to ride on the back of the bus or whatever you don't think we need protections from eachother.

Someday someone is going to demand you kneel to Mecca or stand funny during a song about gays or something and you'll be looking for the same protection.

All we have to do is read message boards like this and some CRC "ideas" on what to do with people of a different race, a different gender, a different orientation, a different religion, a different original nationality....and we know damn well we still need those written protections.

We already have them. Murder is against the law. Sexual harassment is against the law. Using the N-word or other racial epithet is against the laws governing local, state and national employment.

Right now, two murders have been performed against two Republicans in Arkansas and in Oklahoma in a mere two days. 2 former state senators found dead in Arkansas and Oklahoma within days - CNN

Maybe we need a law that Democrats may not use their power to incite public murders of Republicans? Last attempted murder of group of U. S. Representatives who were Republicans had a very bad result for the perpetrator, so now they're just murdering them one by one and moving on.

 

[bodecea]

.

See House approves sweeping bill to expand gay rights

5/17/2019

“WASHINGTON — Democrats in the House approved sweeping anti-discrimination legislation Friday that would extend civil rights protections to LGBT people by prohibiting discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity. The protections would extend to employment, housing, loan applications, education, public accommodations and other areas.”

Well, if you are one who supports and defends our constitutionally limited system of government, and also support our federal constitution’s amendment process to accommodate change for alleged changing times, the Democrat controlled House has confirmed today it is more than willing to usurp powers not granted, and unwilling to be tied to observing our Constitution’s amendment process to gain consent of the governed prior to exercising new legislative powers.

The truth is, the proposed “Equality Act” as it is called, has nothing to do with equality, and everything to do with creating, under law, a privileged sexually deviant class with the government’s muscle behind it. Keep in mind, when the same type of legislation was advanced as a constitutional amendment in the 1980s ___ the Equal Rights Amendment ___ it was rejected by the people of the United States, and for good cause, as it would open a Pandora's Box with countless unintended consequences both disruptive and dangerous. In fact, if adopted, the Equality Act would subvert the people’s right to mutually agree in their contracts and associations which are both inalienable rights of mankind.

And here we are again, but this time the Democrat control House has decided to ignore our Constitution’s required amendment process, and has simply passed legislation usurping a legislative power not granted ____ a legislative power actually rejected when the Equal Rights amendment was defeated in the 1980s.

JWK

"If the Constitution was ratified under the belief, sedulously propagated on all sides that such protection was afforded, [our constitution’s amendment process] would it not now be a fraud upon the whole people to give a different construction to its powers?"___ Justice Story

So let me get this straight (ha)

After 175 or so years of folks enslaving others and forcing peeps to ride on the back of the bus or whatever you don't think we need protections from eachother.

Someday someone is going to demand you kneel to Mecca or stand funny during a song about gays or something and you'll be looking for the same protection.

All we have to do is read message boards like this and some CRC "ideas" on what to do with people of a different race, a different gender, a different orientation, a different religion, a different original nationality....and we know damn well we still need those written protections.

We already have them. Murder is against the law. Sexual harassment is against the law. Using the N-word or other racial epithet is against the laws governing local, state and national employment.

Right now, two murders have been performed against two Republicans in Arkansas and in Oklahoma in a mere two days. 2 former state senators found dead in Arkansas and Oklahoma within days - CNN

Maybe we need a law that Democrats may not use their power to incite public murders of Republicans? Last attempted murder of group of U. S. Representatives who were Republicans had a very bad result for the perpetrator, so now they're just murdering them one by one and moving on.

Wait...you are accusing Democrats of murdering those two state senators? Let's see your evidence, Counselor.

 

[Moonglow]

.

See House approves sweeping bill to expand gay rights

5/17/2019

“WASHINGTON — Democrats in the House approved sweeping anti-discrimination legislation Friday that would extend civil rights protections to LGBT people by prohibiting discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity. The protections would extend to employment, housing, loan applications, education, public accommodations and other areas.”

Well, if you are one who supports and defends our constitutionally limited system of government, and also support our federal constitution’s amendment process to accommodate change for alleged changing times, the Democrat controlled House has confirmed today it is more than willing to usurp powers not granted, and unwilling to be tied to observing our Constitution’s amendment process to gain consent of the governed prior to exercising new legislative powers.

The truth is, the proposed “Equality Act” as it is called, has nothing to do with equality, and everything to do with creating, under law, a privileged sexually deviant class with the government’s muscle behind it. Keep in mind, when the same type of legislation was advanced as a constitutional amendment in the 1980s ___ the Equal Rights Amendment ___ it was rejected by the people of the United States, and for good cause, as it would open a Pandora's Box with countless unintended consequences both disruptive and dangerous. In fact, if adopted, the Equality Act would subvert the people’s right to mutually agree in their contracts and associations which are both inalienable rights of mankind.

And here we are again, but this time the Democrat control House has decided to ignore our Constitution’s required amendment process, and has simply passed legislation usurping a legislative power not granted ____ a legislative power actually rejected when the Equal Rights amendment was defeated in the 1980s.

JWK

"If the Constitution was ratified under the belief, sedulously propagated on all sides that such protection was afforded, [our constitution’s amendment process] would it not now be a fraud upon the whole people to give a different construction to its powers?"___ Justice Story

So let me get this straight (ha)

After 175 or so years of folks enslaving others and forcing peeps to ride on the back of the bus or whatever you don't think we need protections from eachother.

Someday someone is going to demand you kneel to Mecca or stand funny during a song about gays or something and you'll be looking for the same protection.

All we have to do is read message boards like this and some CRC "ideas" on what to do with people of a different race, a different gender, a different orientation, a different religion, a different original nationality....and we know damn well we still need those written protections.

We already have them. Murder is against the law. Sexual harassment is against the law. Using the N-word or other racial epithet is against the laws governing local, state and national employment.

Right now, two murders have been performed against two Republicans in Arkansas and in Oklahoma in a mere two days. 2 former state senators found dead in Arkansas and Oklahoma within days - CNN

Maybe we need a law that Democrats may not use their power to incite public murders of Republicans? Last attempted murder of group of U. S. Representatives who were Republicans had a very bad result for the perpetrator, so now they're just murdering them one by one and moving on.

One was a state senator the other was a former state senator...More than likely their deaths occurred because it was God's will...Yet that has nothing to do with what laws are on the books and how people and businesses treat the minority in reality.

 

[beautress]

Pelosi has been screaming and ranting hateful things at Republicans including two years of calumny against a sitting Republican President. She and her conspirators knew from the get go it was a huge lie, but perpetrated the assinine claim well after it was shown he did not do what they claimed was an impeachable offense.

It has come to light that the perpetrator of this hatred was none other than Former First Lady, Senator, and Secretary of State schemed with two former Clinton spin room creeps, Sid Blumenthal and Hillary Clinton perpetrated the Steele Dossier against the President, which was 100% salacious fiction that would make anyone mad at the person who committed the acts therein, except for one detail: it was a lie. The entire Steele dossier was based on activities that never happened.

Feinstein screamed rape falsely against a Republican candidate for the Supreme Court. She used a professor who taught false scenario as okay to her students in a California college. She had no proof, no address, not sure of the date, and she was barely acquainted with the young virgin high school male who stayed a virgin until he married, for God's sake. Schumer and Pelosi were there fluffing the "poor woman" whose feigning wrong and body language gave away the truth: she wasn't telling the truth!

A US Representative named Steve Scalise was the target of an angry Democrat gunman two years ago when he and 30 other Republicans were practicing for an upcoming baseball game. Before he shot him, he asked several people if these were "the Republicans." So he wasn't a drive-by shooter, he planned on killing some Republicans.

Lawmaker Steve Scalise is critically injured in GOP baseball shooting ...
https://www.washingtonpost.com/...injured...shooting.../0289c768-50f6-11e7-be25-3a5...

Jun 14, 2017 - ... baseball shooting; gunman James T. Hodgkinson is killed by police ... Two Capitol Police officers assigned to Scalise's security detail were wounded. ... Rep. Roger Williams (R-Tex.) injured his ankle while helping others take cover. ...

The law we need right now is to make sure people know they are not welcome to target members of a party being pilloried to death, literally, by gollies by the damn speaker of the House.

 

[beautress]

.

See House approves sweeping bill to expand gay rights

5/17/2019

“WASHINGTON — Democrats in the House approved sweeping anti-discrimination legislation Friday that would extend civil rights protections to LGBT people by prohibiting discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity. The protections would extend to employment, housing, loan applications, education, public accommodations and other areas.”

Well, if you are one who supports and defends our constitutionally limited system of government, and also support our federal constitution’s amendment process to accommodate change for alleged changing times, the Democrat controlled House has confirmed today it is more than willing to usurp powers not granted, and unwilling to be tied to observing our Constitution’s amendment process to gain consent of the governed prior to exercising new legislative powers.

The truth is, the proposed “Equality Act” as it is called, has nothing to do with equality, and everything to do with creating, under law, a privileged sexually deviant class with the government’s muscle behind it. Keep in mind, when the same type of legislation was advanced as a constitutional amendment in the 1980s ___ the Equal Rights Amendment ___ it was rejected by the people of the United States, and for good cause, as it would open a Pandora's Box with countless unintended consequences both disruptive and dangerous. In fact, if adopted, the Equality Act would subvert the people’s right to mutually agree in their contracts and associations which are both inalienable rights of mankind.

And here we are again, but this time the Democrat control House has decided to ignore our Constitution’s required amendment process, and has simply passed legislation usurping a legislative power not granted ____ a legislative power actually rejected when the Equal Rights amendment was defeated in the 1980s.

JWK

"If the Constitution was ratified under the belief, sedulously propagated on all sides that such protection was afforded, [our constitution’s amendment process] would it not now be a fraud upon the whole people to give a different construction to its powers?"___ Justice Story

So let me get this straight (ha)

After 175 or so years of folks enslaving others and forcing peeps to ride on the back of the bus or whatever you don't think we need protections from eachother.

Someday someone is going to demand you kneel to Mecca or stand funny during a song about gays or something and you'll be looking for the same protection.

All we have to do is read message boards like this and some CRC "ideas" on what to do with people of a different race, a different gender, a different orientation, a different religion, a different original nationality....and we know damn well we still need those written protections.

We already have them. Murder is against the law. Sexual harassment is against the law. Using the N-word or other racial epithet is against the laws governing local, state and national employment.

Right now, two murders have been performed against two Republicans in Arkansas and in Oklahoma in a mere two days. 2 former state senators found dead in Arkansas and Oklahoma within days - CNN

Maybe we need a law that Democrats may not use their power to incite public murders of Republicans? Last attempted murder of group of U. S. Representatives who were Republicans had a very bad result for the perpetrator, so now they're just murdering them one by one and moving on.

Wait...you are accusing Democrats of murdering those two state senators? Let's see your evidence, Counselor.

I didn't accuse a democrat of murder. Here's what I said:

Maybe we need a law that Democrats may not use their power to incite public murders of Republicans? Last attempted murder of group of U. S. Representatives who were Republicans had a very bad result for the perpetrator, so now they're just murdering them one by one and moving on.​

 

[bodecea]

.

See House approves sweeping bill to expand gay rights

5/17/2019

“WASHINGTON — Democrats in the House approved sweeping anti-discrimination legislation Friday that would extend civil rights protections to LGBT people by prohibiting discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity. The protections would extend to employment, housing, loan applications, education, public accommodations and other areas.”

Well, if you are one who supports and defends our constitutionally limited system of government, and also support our federal constitution’s amendment process to accommodate change for alleged changing times, the Democrat controlled House has confirmed today it is more than willing to usurp powers not granted, and unwilling to be tied to observing our Constitution’s amendment process to gain consent of the governed prior to exercising new legislative powers.

The truth is, the proposed “Equality Act” as it is called, has nothing to do with equality, and everything to do with creating, under law, a privileged sexually deviant class with the government’s muscle behind it. Keep in mind, when the same type of legislation was advanced as a constitutional amendment in the 1980s ___ the Equal Rights Amendment ___ it was rejected by the people of the United States, and for good cause, as it would open a Pandora's Box with countless unintended consequences both disruptive and dangerous. In fact, if adopted, the Equality Act would subvert the people’s right to mutually agree in their contracts and associations which are both inalienable rights of mankind.

And here we are again, but this time the Democrat control House has decided to ignore our Constitution’s required amendment process, and has simply passed legislation usurping a legislative power not granted ____ a legislative power actually rejected when the Equal Rights amendment was defeated in the 1980s.

JWK

"If the Constitution was ratified under the belief, sedulously propagated on all sides that such protection was afforded, [our constitution’s amendment process] would it not now be a fraud upon the whole people to give a different construction to its powers?"___ Justice Story

So let me get this straight (ha)

After 175 or so years of folks enslaving others and forcing peeps to ride on the back of the bus or whatever you don't think we need protections from eachother.

Someday someone is going to demand you kneel to Mecca or stand funny during a song about gays or something and you'll be looking for the same protection.

All we have to do is read message boards like this and some CRC "ideas" on what to do with people of a different race, a different gender, a different orientation, a different religion, a different original nationality....and we know damn well we still need those written protections.

We already have them. Murder is against the law. Sexual harassment is against the law. Using the N-word or other racial epithet is against the laws governing local, state and national employment.

Right now, two murders have been performed against two Republicans in Arkansas and in Oklahoma in a mere two days. 2 former state senators found dead in Arkansas and Oklahoma within days - CNN

Maybe we need a law that Democrats may not use their power to incite public murders of Republicans? Last attempted murder of group of U. S. Representatives who were Republicans had a very bad result for the perpetrator, so now they're just murdering them one by one and moving on.

One was a state senator the other was a former state senator...More than likely their deaths occurred because it was God's will...Yet that has nothing to do with what laws are on the books and how people and businesses treat the minority in reality.

Both shootings? Thoughts and prayers.

 

[Moonglow]

.

See House approves sweeping bill to expand gay rights

5/17/2019

“WASHINGTON — Democrats in the House approved sweeping anti-discrimination legislation Friday that would extend civil rights protections to LGBT people by prohibiting discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity. The protections would extend to employment, housing, loan applications, education, public accommodations and other areas.”

Well, if you are one who supports and defends our constitutionally limited system of government, and also support our federal constitution’s amendment process to accommodate change for alleged changing times, the Democrat controlled House has confirmed today it is more than willing to usurp powers not granted, and unwilling to be tied to observing our Constitution’s amendment process to gain consent of the governed prior to exercising new legislative powers.

The truth is, the proposed “Equality Act” as it is called, has nothing to do with equality, and everything to do with creating, under law, a privileged sexually deviant class with the government’s muscle behind it. Keep in mind, when the same type of legislation was advanced as a constitutional amendment in the 1980s ___ the Equal Rights Amendment ___ it was rejected by the people of the United States, and for good cause, as it would open a Pandora's Box with countless unintended consequences both disruptive and dangerous. In fact, if adopted, the Equality Act would subvert the people’s right to mutually agree in their contracts and associations which are both inalienable rights of mankind.

And here we are again, but this time the Democrat control House has decided to ignore our Constitution’s required amendment process, and has simply passed legislation usurping a legislative power not granted ____ a legislative power actually rejected when the Equal Rights amendment was defeated in the 1980s.

JWK

"If the Constitution was ratified under the belief, sedulously propagated on all sides that such protection was afforded, [our constitution’s amendment process] would it not now be a fraud upon the whole people to give a different construction to its powers?"___ Justice Story

So let me get this straight (ha)

After 175 or so years of folks enslaving others and forcing peeps to ride on the back of the bus or whatever you don't think we need protections from eachother.

Someday someone is going to demand you kneel to Mecca or stand funny during a song about gays or something and you'll be looking for the same protection.

All we have to do is read message boards like this and some CRC "ideas" on what to do with people of a different race, a different gender, a different orientation, a different religion, a different original nationality....and we know damn well we still need those written protections.

We already have them. Murder is against the law. Sexual harassment is against the law. Using the N-word or other racial epithet is against the laws governing local, state and national employment.

Right now, two murders have been performed against two Republicans in Arkansas and in Oklahoma in a mere two days. 2 former state senators found dead in Arkansas and Oklahoma within days - CNN

Maybe we need a law that Democrats may not use their power to incite public murders of Republicans? Last attempted murder of group of U. S. Representatives who were Republicans had a very bad result for the perpetrator, so now they're just murdering them one by one and moving on.

One was a state senator the other was a former state senator...More than likely their deaths occurred because it was God's will...Yet that has nothing to do with what laws are on the books and how people and businesses treat the minority in reality.

Both shootings? Thoughts and prayers.

I am sending positive vibes man...

 

[bodecea]

.

See House approves sweeping bill to expand gay rights

5/17/2019

“WASHINGTON — Democrats in the House approved sweeping anti-discrimination legislation Friday that would extend civil rights protections to LGBT people by prohibiting discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity. The protections would extend to employment, housing, loan applications, education, public accommodations and other areas.”

Well, if you are one who supports and defends our constitutionally limited system of government, and also support our federal constitution’s amendment process to accommodate change for alleged changing times, the Democrat controlled House has confirmed today it is more than willing to usurp powers not granted, and unwilling to be tied to observing our Constitution’s amendment process to gain consent of the governed prior to exercising new legislative powers.

The truth is, the proposed “Equality Act” as it is called, has nothing to do with equality, and everything to do with creating, under law, a privileged sexually deviant class with the government’s muscle behind it. Keep in mind, when the same type of legislation was advanced as a constitutional amendment in the 1980s ___ the Equal Rights Amendment ___ it was rejected by the people of the United States, and for good cause, as it would open a Pandora's Box with countless unintended consequences both disruptive and dangerous. In fact, if adopted, the Equality Act would subvert the people’s right to mutually agree in their contracts and associations which are both inalienable rights of mankind.

And here we are again, but this time the Democrat control House has decided to ignore our Constitution’s required amendment process, and has simply passed legislation usurping a legislative power not granted ____ a legislative power actually rejected when the Equal Rights amendment was defeated in the 1980s.

JWK

"If the Constitution was ratified under the belief, sedulously propagated on all sides that such protection was afforded, [our constitution’s amendment process] would it not now be a fraud upon the whole people to give a different construction to its powers?"___ Justice Story

So let me get this straight (ha)

After 175 or so years of folks enslaving others and forcing peeps to ride on the back of the bus or whatever you don't think we need protections from eachother.

Someday someone is going to demand you kneel to Mecca or stand funny during a song about gays or something and you'll be looking for the same protection.

All we have to do is read message boards like this and some CRC "ideas" on what to do with people of a different race, a different gender, a different orientation, a different religion, a different original nationality....and we know damn well we still need those written protections.

We already have them. Murder is against the law. Sexual harassment is against the law. Using the N-word or other racial epithet is against the laws governing local, state and national employment.

Right now, two murders have been performed against two Republicans in Arkansas and in Oklahoma in a mere two days. 2 former state senators found dead in Arkansas and Oklahoma within days - CNN

Maybe we need a law that Democrats may not use their power to incite public murders of Republicans? Last attempted murder of group of U. S. Representatives who were Republicans had a very bad result for the perpetrator, so now they're just murdering them one by one and moving on.

Wait...you are accusing Democrats of murdering those two state senators? Let's see your evidence, Counselor.

I didn't accuse a democrat of murder. Here's what I said:

Maybe we need a law that Democrats may not use their power to incite public murders of Republicans? Last attempted murder of group of U. S. Representatives who were Republicans had a very bad result for the perpetrator, so now they're just murdering them one by one and moving on.​

There you are again...accusing Democrats of murder.