House votes to create sexual deviant rights and violates constitutional limitations

.

See House approves sweeping bill to expand gay rights

5/17/2019

“WASHINGTON — Democrats in the House approved sweeping anti-discrimination legislation Friday that would extend civil rights protections to LGBT people by prohibiting discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity. The protections would extend to employment, housing, loan applications, education, public accommodations and other areas.”

Well, if you are one who supports and defends our constitutionally limited system of government, and also support our federal constitution’s amendment process to accommodate change for alleged changing times, the Democrat controlled House has confirmed today it is more than willing to usurp powers not granted, and unwilling to be tied to observing our Constitution’s amendment process to gain consent of the governed prior to exercising new legislative powers.

The truth is, the proposed “Equality Act” as it is called, has nothing to do with equality, and everything to do with creating, under law, a privileged sexually deviant class with the government’s muscle behind it. Keep in mind, when the same type of legislation was advanced as a constitutional amendment in the 1980s ___ the Equal Rights Amendment ___ it was rejected by the people of the United States, and for good cause, as it would open a Pandora's Box with countless unintended consequences both disruptive and dangerous. In fact, if adopted, the Equality Act would subvert the people’s right to mutually agree in their contracts and associations which are both inalienable rights of mankind.

And here we are again, but this time the Democrat control House has decided to ignore our Constitution’s required amendment process, and has simply passed legislation usurping a legislative power not granted ____ a legislative power actually rejected when the Equal Rights amendment was defeated in the 1980s.

JWK

"If the Constitution was ratified under the belief, sedulously propagated on all sides that such protection was afforded, [our constitution’s amendment process] would it not now be a fraud upon the whole people to give a different construction to its powers?"___ Justice Story

So let me get this straight (ha)

After 175 or so years of folks enslaving others and forcing peeps to ride on the back of the bus or whatever you don't think we need protections from eachother.

Someday someone is going to demand you kneel to Mecca or stand funny during a song about gays or something and you'll be looking for the same protection.
Race is a scientific thing. Claiming you’re anything other than the sex you were born is a mental illness. You idiots already demand kneeling for muslims and baking cakes for The mentally unstable. WTF are you talking about someone coming to save us? Nobody will be coming. They’re all in on the SJW bullshit.

one man's mental illness is another liking to masturbate in the shower.

one man's mental illness or sin is another having sex outside of marriage.

one man's mental illness or sin is another ejaculating for purposes other than procreation.

How about using another hole on your wife for pleasure? That a mental illness but not using the same hole on a man?

Far as the folks who want sex changes, whatever. I'm not for big government so as long as they aren't hurting anyone and pay their taxes I don't care what Mike Pence does with or to his sticks and holes.

Oh, and someday a group of righteous christians just might find themselves someplace in the minority compared to other righteous christians or worse and need to flee across the ocean because they do or don't believe some pope or king or shaman is the hand of the almighty. A god fearing christian should have a long enough term sense of history to know what comes around goes around. One day the Romans are feeding you to the lions, the next you're the only power in Europe, then the Muslims own Spain and the dying Roman Empire is blocking em @ Constantanople. By the time you almost have your stuff together your church becomes soo corrupt you now have a hundred different versions of it killing each other over the nature of the trinity or predestination.

So yeah, don't weaken them constitutional protections for those who like using their sticks and holes in different ways than you do or else those protections won't be there when you need them.
 
Thank Fox that here in America bigots andmhomophobe still feel that not every citizen is equal under law and can say so.

But those bigots and homophobes do not have the right to impose their arcane attitudes through law.


I don't understand what you mean.


Perhaps I am in error but the Equality Act attempts to exercise an unconstitutional and authoritarian government power over rights associated with property ownership, and does so under the guise of "equal rights", and, support for the bill highlights the bigoted thinking of those who support it.


The fact is, the Equality Act, in addition to being beyond Congress’ delegated legislative powers, and that it attempts to usurp legislative control over private property, it impinges upon a homosexual shop owner’s inalienable right to only hire other homosexuals.

Similarly, the Equality Act impinges upon a lesbian shop owner’s inalienable right to hire who the lesbian chooses to hire, who may want to choose to only hire other lesbians. As such, the Equality Act is therefore a fundamental attack on the lesbian’s right to mutually agree in contracts and associations.

Why is this so difficult for many in the rainbow crowd to understand and accept this? Why are they so eager to surrender an inalienable right to mutually agree in contracts and associations?


JWK

The Equality Act attempts to pass legislation authorized under the “Equal Rights Amendment” which was rejected by the American people, and thus, to this degree, is a usurpation of power not granted.
 
I don’t support any discrimination or public accommodation laws, but the idea this act will allow civil rights for pedos is nothing more than scaremongering by silly retards.
It's the same hysteria that screamed that same-sex marriage will lead to people marrying their lawnmowers.


I have no idea what you are talking about but I do know the Democrat Party Leadership, which passed this Bill, despises rights associated with property ownership, and this bill is another attempt for folks in government to manage and control private property under the guise of sexual deviant rights.

JWK

Of course there is income inequality. Some of our citizens work at improving their station in life, while others expect the force and hand of government to transfer income into their pockets.
 
You can't create equality. Equality happens with lack of legislation
This is institutional discrimination.
 
If those afflicted could trust the generosity of the Christian nation then no codicils would be necessary, yet, that has not been the case with people in the USA and their inability to "naturally" treat people that are different equally..
Going by the OP's so-called "trust" in people...we wouldn't even need the Bill of Rights, would we? :71:
You don’t have a right to demand special treatment because you’re too mentally unstable to figure out what sex you are.
I know perfectly well what sex (gender) I am....and I have one more advantage over such as yourself. I can clearly distinguish between those who consent between adults and the predators who assault children and animals.
Do you support ten year olds being celebrated as trans? Do you support doctors performing surgery and medication on those under 18 to become the other sex? Do you believe in more than two genders?
For your first question...I do not. As for the second....I am not a doctor....unlike CRCs I am not in a position to take medical decisions away from those who went to medical school...As for more than two genders...that's a fact.....
You don’t have to be a doctor to have common sense. Then again thinking there are more than two genders proves you don’t have any.
 
You can't create equality. Equality happens with lack of legislation
This is institutional discrimination.

It is also an attempt by government to seize control over property and forbid people to be free to mutually agree in contracts and their associations.

JWK




" I believe that there are more instances of the abridgement of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachment of those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations." ___ Madison Elliot`s Debates, vol. III, page 87

 
One of the problems of having a full-time legislature in a country that has been in existence for more than 200 years is that it has nothing productive to do. The need for a NEW LAW comes very rarely, and generally in response to a cultural or technological change that previous laws did not anticipate. Hence, a worthless and pointless legislature will get into mischief by proposing laws that solve non-existent problems while creating other greater problems in the "solution."

Where is the demonstrated NEED for this legislation? Do [sexually fucked up] people earn less, do they find it hard to get a job, are they not able to find a place to live, or to buy their own homes, are they discriminated against by lenders, government agencies, restaurants, insurance companies????

No, to all of the above. Any statistics to the contrary are ginned up by pro-queer advocacy groups and have no statistical validity.

What we have is a collection of anecdotal incidents of hurtful or harmful acts, most of which are already covered by some sort of Federal, state, or local law, and for which the "victims" are justified in asking our sympathy. But that's about it.

The proposed law (which thankfully will never become the Law of the Land) ignores the fact that it is IMPOSSIBLE to create a LEGAL DEFINITION for a homosexual. Is a celibate man who is sexually attracted to other men a "homosexual"? How about a conventionally married man who dabbles in fudge-packing on the occasional night out? How about a masculine-looking woman who has never had or desired sexual congress with any other living thing? If any of these people feels slighted they would come under the purview of this horrible law, regardless of whether the "perpetrator" was even aware that the "victim" was protected. This goes a large step beyond "thought crimes"; it is INFERRED Thought Crimes. You don't even know you had the thought.

Do we want to force a lingerie store to hire Bruce Fucking Jenner as a bra salesperson? If they turned him down they would be looking at a lawsuit (and more) under this law.

As Dennis Prager often points out, Leftism is a mental disease.
 
You can't create equality. Equality happens with lack of legislation
This is institutional discrimination.
Good thing they have never needed the Constitution to remind them of the equality they didn't give blacks in the US..
You don't give equality. Equality is a human right. All you do is take it away with legislation.
 
the one place we seem to disagree is that you think that homosexuals are sexual deviants, I disagree. I think we should all be allowed to do what makes us happy without judgement from others as long as we are not hurting anyone and it involves consenting adults.

Well, when I use the phrase "sexual deviants" I am only going by this groups' intentional desire to label themselves as an identifiable "community", and having different sexual proclivities [LGBT] than ordinary folk. Am I factually in error?

I'm not sure where our disagreement is.

JWK


The Democrat Party Leadership detests people being left free to mutually agree in their contracts and associations.
Again, to keep it simple...Anti-discrimination laws about sexual preference protect us all...gay or straight.
They certainly do not. They allow these classes to oppress us. We've seen that with queers forcing people to participate in their queer weddings.
 
Thank Fox that here in America bigots andmhomophobe still feel that not every citizen is equal under law and can say so.

But those bigots and homophobes do not have the right to impose their arcane attitudes through law.
No one has the right to force others to serve them. We are all equal in that regard.
So...you support these guys who were fined and suspended for their beliefs and refusal to serve people based on their religion....Muslim cab drivers lose round in court
Sure I do. Furthermore, who takes a normal cab these days? Most people I know use Uber or Lyft. How can anyone even know your religious beliefs unless you're wearing a skull cap or an Hajib?
 
Thank Fox that here in America bigots andmhomophobe still feel that not every citizen is equal under law and can say so.

But those bigots and homophobes do not have the right to impose their arcane attitudes through law.
No one has the right to force others to serve them. We are all equal in that regard.
Do you reserve the 'right' to Snyder service to Blacks because they're Black?
What the hell does "Snyder service" mean?
Sorry. Small keyboard, large thumbs.

Do you reserve the right to deny service to Blacks because they're Black?
Do I "reserve" it? No, everyone is born with the right to discriminate. That's called "freedom of choice."
 
You can't create equality. Equality happens with lack of legislation
This is institutional discrimination.

It is also an attempt by government to seize control over property and forbid people to be free to mutually agree in contracts and their associations.

JWK




" I believe that there are more instances of the abridgement of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachment of those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations." ___ Madison Elliot`s Debates, vol. III, page 87
If you’re not 100% onboard with the homo agenda you will not be allowed to own a business, have a job or live in your home peacefully. You won’t be allowed out in public and you will not be allowed to associate with anyone other than the shamed class.
 
You can't create equality. Equality happens with lack of legislation
This is institutional discrimination.

It is also an attempt by government to seize control over property and forbid people to be free to mutually agree in contracts and their associations.

JWK




" I believe that there are more instances of the abridgement of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachment of those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations." ___ Madison Elliot`s Debates, vol. III, page 87
If you’re not 100% onboard with the homo agenda you will not be allowed to own a business, have a job or live in your home peacefully. You won’t be allowed out in public and you will not be allowed to associate with anyone other than the shamed class.

And males may be made to marry males, females made to marry females, all under the guise not wanting to do so is forbidden discrimination.


JWK



The Equality Act attempts to pass legislation authorized under the “Equal Rights Amendment” which was rejected by the American people, and thus, to this degree, is a usurpation of power not granted.
 
You can't create equality. Equality happens with lack of legislation
This is institutional discrimination.

It is also an attempt by government to seize control over property and forbid people to be free to mutually agree in contracts and their associations.

JWK




" I believe that there are more instances of the abridgement of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachment of those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations." ___ Madison Elliot`s Debates, vol. III, page 87
If you’re not 100% onboard with the homo agenda you will not be allowed to own a business, have a job or live in your home peacefully. You won’t be allowed out in public and you will not be allowed to associate with anyone other than the shamed class.

And males may be made to marry males, females made to marry females, all under the guise not wanting to do so is forbidden discrimination.


JWK



The Equality Act attempts to pass legislation authorized under the “Equal Rights Amendment” which was rejected by the American people, and thus, to this degree, is a usurpation of power not granted.
The trans nut bags already complain straight men won’t date them. Apparently unable to grasp what straight means and they aren’t females in any way shape or form.
 
You can't create equality. Equality happens with lack of legislation
This is institutional discrimination.

It is also an attempt by government to seize control over property and forbid people to be free to mutually agree in contracts and their associations.

JWK




" I believe that there are more instances of the abridgement of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachment of those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations." ___ Madison Elliot`s Debates, vol. III, page 87
If you’re not 100% onboard with the homo agenda you will not be allowed to own a business, have a job or live in your home peacefully. You won’t be allowed out in public and you will not be allowed to associate with anyone other than the shamed class.

And males may be made to marry males, females made to marry females, all under the guise not wanting to do so is forbidden discrimination.


JWK



The Equality Act attempts to pass legislation authorized under the “Equal Rights Amendment” which was rejected by the American people, and thus, to this degree, is a usurpation of power not granted.
The trans nut bags already complain straight men won’t date them. Apparently unable to grasp what straight means and they aren’t females in any way shape or form.
How long until they start demanding laws that force straight men to have sex with them?
 
You can't create equality. Equality happens with lack of legislation
This is institutional discrimination.

It is also an attempt by government to seize control over property and forbid people to be free to mutually agree in contracts and their associations.

JWK




" I believe that there are more instances of the abridgement of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachment of those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations." ___ Madison Elliot`s Debates, vol. III, page 87
If you’re not 100% onboard with the homo agenda you will not be allowed to own a business, have a job or live in your home peacefully. You won’t be allowed out in public and you will not be allowed to associate with anyone other than the shamed class.

And males may be made to marry males, females made to marry females, all under the guise not wanting to do so is forbidden discrimination.


JWK



The Equality Act attempts to pass legislation authorized under the “Equal Rights Amendment” which was rejected by the American people, and thus, to this degree, is a usurpation of power not granted.
The trans nut bags already complain straight men won’t date them. Apparently unable to grasp what straight means and they aren’t females in any way shape or form.
How long until they start demanding laws that force straight men to have sex with them?
It’s coming. It will be a hate crime to refuse.
 
I don’t support any discrimination or public accommodation laws, but the idea this act will allow civil rights for pedos is nothing more than scaremongering by silly retards.
It's the same hysteria that screamed that same-sex marriage will lead to people marrying their lawnmowers.


I have no idea what you are talking about but I do know the Democrat Party Leadership, which passed this Bill, despises rights associated with property ownership, and this bill is another attempt for folks in government to manage and control private property under the guise of sexual deviant rights.

JWK

Of course there is income inequality. Some of our citizens work at improving their station in life, while others expect the force and hand of government to transfer income into their pockets.
What about business licenses? Are they unconstitutional?
 
You can't create equality. Equality happens with lack of legislation
This is institutional discrimination.

It is also an attempt by government to seize control over property and forbid people to be free to mutually agree in contracts and their associations.

JWK




" I believe that there are more instances of the abridgement of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachment of those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations." ___ Madison Elliot`s Debates, vol. III, page 87
If you’re not 100% onboard with the homo agenda you will not be allowed to own a business, have a job or live in your home peacefully. You won’t be allowed out in public and you will not be allowed to associate with anyone other than the shamed class.

And males may be made to marry males, females made to marry females, all under the guise not wanting to do so is forbidden discrimination.


JWK



The Equality Act attempts to pass legislation authorized under the “Equal Rights Amendment” which was rejected by the American people, and thus, to this degree, is a usurpation of power not granted.
The trans nut bags already complain straight men won’t date them. Apparently unable to grasp what straight means and they aren’t females in any way shape or form.
How long until they start demanding laws that force straight men to have sex with them?
Wow.....that really opened up some secret fantasies, didn't it? Talk about all the fun of gay sex without any of the responsibilities.
 

Forum List

Back
Top