House Discharge Petition re Epstein Files Will Pass

[jc456]

So, what was on Bondi's desk, when she claimed the evidence was in her possession and is being examined?



What were they examining?

well she said the Epstein file, she never said list. NEVER

 

[jc456]

Again, no one here condones pedophilia. It appears Epstein didn't engage with prepubescent girls either.

absolutely never charged.

 

[YoursTruly]

So why didnt biden release the files?

How many times do you need this question answered?

 

[YoursTruly]

One will mysteriously change their mind.

And come up with some BS excuse.

 

[postman]

And yet none of you with these theories can explain why Biden didn't go after them?

Biden never promised to release them, and since Biden adhered to DOJ norms, that would have been Merrick Garland's (AG) call, not Biden's.

Former top Biden White House official blames Merrick Garland for failure to look into the Epstein files: ‘He was hypersensitive’

“Any time I say anything about Epstein, they’re like, ‘Why didn’t Joe Biden’s — why didn’t Joe Biden release the files?’ And this is what I say: Have you met Merrick Garland?” Tanden said.…

nypost.com

A former top White House official blamed ex-Attorney General Merrick Garland for the Biden administration’s failure to do a deep dive into files related to notorious pedophile Jeffrey Epstein.

“Any time I say anything about Epstein, they’re like, ‘why didn’t Joe Biden release the files?’ And this is what I say: ‘Have you met Merrick Garland?’”

“[T]he Joe Biden White House had nothing to do with enforcement on any topic,”
“because of the abuses of the Trump administration, the White House didn’t engage in any particular enforcement matter.”

the Biden White House had “no idea” what — if anything — Garland was doing related to the Epstein files, but that she believes the former attorney general couldn’t tolerate being potentially viewed as biased if he were to open more criminal cases related to Epstein’s underage sex-trafficking endeavors.

 

[Mac1958]

Trump might very well have nothing to do with this.

However, it sure does sound like OTHER guys DO.

I wish we could concentrate on THAT, and get the info out.

 

[Chuz Life]

Again, no one here condones pedophilia. It appears Epstein didn't engage with prepubescent girls either.

So what was Maxwell convicted of? Should she not be released from prison, if she's so obviously not guilty?

 

[Chuz Life]

well she said the Epstein file, she never said list. NEVER

 

[leftwinger]

So what was Maxwell convicted of? Should she not be released from prison, if she's so obviously not guilty?

She was falsely over-charged and of course convicted to silence her by deep state who don't want to be dragged thru mud. "She said", "He denies" then what? 2 year trials.

First time offender rail-roaded on "she said" nonsense?

Nary a peep outa her in jail, it worked. Trump finally got an interview done. But Board Stain Alinsky don't believe her no matter what she says. What was the point?

 

[leftwinger]

I made the argument they saved many a young troubled girl from a dead end life if captured by vicious street pimps. Of course I was Lambasted by board phony middlers.

 

[Mac-7]

How many times do you need this question answered?

Instead of admitting you cant answer, dont try to hide the fact by asking a counter question

If you have something to say just say it

But obviously you dont

 

[OldFlame]

It depends. If it was a public official/ policy maker on the island.

Yes.

So let's say there were some on the island and no evidence to prove that they did anything illegal while there? Then what? Do they get fired? Does their name get dragged thru the mud because if they were on Epstein's island they were 100% guilty even though it can't be proven in a court of law?

 

[OldFlame]

Biden never promised to release them, and since Biden adhered to DOJ norms, that would have been Merrick Garland's (AG) call, not Biden's.

Former top Biden White House official blames Merrick Garland for failure to look into the Epstein files: ‘He was hypersensitive’

“Any time I say anything about Epstein, they’re like, ‘Why didn’t Joe Biden’s — why didn’t Joe Biden release the files?’ And this is what I say: Have you met Merrick Garland?” Tanden said.…

nypost.com

A former top White House official blamed ex-Attorney General Merrick Garland for the Biden administration’s failure to do a deep dive into files related to notorious pedophile Jeffrey Epstein.

“Any time I say anything about Epstein, they’re like, ‘why didn’t Joe Biden release the files?’ And this is what I say: ‘Have you met Merrick Garland?’”

“[T]he Joe Biden White House had nothing to do with enforcement on any topic,”
“because of the abuses of the Trump administration, the White House didn’t engage in any particular enforcement matter.”

the Biden White House had “no idea” what — if anything — Garland was doing related to the Epstein files, but that she believes the former attorney general couldn’t tolerate being potentially viewed as biased if he were to open more criminal cases related to Epstein’s underage sex-trafficking endeavors.

Sorry, but that's just laughable.

 

[leftwinger]

Maybe a few young ones were tricked or led by older girls or Maxwell. But living unimaginable luxury probably with drugs and money? Versus being a street hooker raped and forced by a street pimp to perform a few Johns every day & night for years?

Then showered with millions after? To keep quiet? Epstein put in jail for his crimes? Uh....not all bad for these "victims".

 

[Chuz Life]

So let's say there were some on the island and no evidence to prove that they did anything illegal while there? Then what? Do they get fired? Does their name get dragged thru the mud because if they were on Epstein's island they were 100% guilty even though it can't be proven in a court of law?

Those are good questions that I suppose are trying to get at my expectations.

My expectation is for accountability for any crimes committed, and for any possible ties to national security, money laundering, etc.

We were promised transparency and so far, we have absolutely no accountability for anyone other than Maxwell and Epstein who we are supposed to believe (in spite of what the now women say) kept the girls all to themselves.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Well, this is the consequence of his "Big Mistake" then. Isn't it.

Yes, exactly.

His big mistake gave his critics something legitimate to criticize, which is a nice change for them.

The trick for you all will be to figure out a way to keep this out of the "yesterday's news" bin until the election.

Or whatever your goal is for this little project. Have they let you know what the endgame is on this one?

 

[OldFlame]

Maybe a few young ones were tricked or led by older girls or Maxwell. But living unimaginable luxury probably with drugs and money? Versus being a street hooker raped and forced by a street pimp to perform a few Johns?

Then showered with millions after? To keep quiet? Epstein put in jail for his crimes? Uh....not all bad for these "victims".

I agree that they were showered with money and possessions to keep them quiet, and also so that if they did come back and point a finger later, Epstein would have 'proof' that they were just prostitutes. But he and Maxwell groomed underage girls, still a crime of statutory rape no matter how you slice it and dice it, not to mention predatory and disgusting.

 

[OldFlame]

Those are good questions that I suppose are trying to get at my expectations.

My expectation is for accountability for any crimes committed, and for any possible ties to national security, money laundering, etc.

We were promised transparency and so far, we have absolutely no accountability for anyone other than Maxwell and Epstein who we are supposed to believe (in spite of what the now women say) kept the girls all to themselves.

And my theory is that they don't have enough proof of any crimes to indict, and they can't drag someone's name thru the mud without proof of a crime. They do that exact thing to Trump, over and over again, and it's wrong. He's won lawsuits over it.

 

[Chuz Life]

Yes, exactly.

His big mistake gave his critics something legitimate to criticize, which is a nice change for them.

The trick for you all will be to figure out a way to keep this out of the "yesterday's news" bin until the election.

Or whatever your goal is for this little project. Have they let you know what the endgame is on this one?

I have always stood on principle before party. Note my work and posts fighting abortion. Politics is a big part of that, but I will not compromise my defense of children, principles, etc., for political expediency.

Obviously, a lot of others here on USMB, would.

 

[postman]

She was falsely over-charged and of course convicted to silence her by deep state who don't want to be dragged thru mud. "She said", "He denies" then what? 2 year trials.

First time offender rail-roaded on "she said" nonsense?

Nary a peep outa her in jail, it worked. Trump finally got an interview done. But Board Stain Alinsky don't believe her no matter what she says. What was the point?

She was convicted by a jury of her peers, while being represented by the best lawyers money could buy.

The law firm Haddon, Morgan and Foreman has accused Ms. Maxwell and her brother of failing to pay nearly $900,000 in legal fees