It is intellectually lazy to simply jump on a bandwagon that is based entirely on computer models and ignores real world factual data.
Then get off that denier bandwagon.
2014, Warmest year ever. 2015, even warmer. That's no model.
Stratospheric cooling, outgoing longwave decrease, backradiation increase. No models there.
Can you give us your theory that explains all that directly observed evidence? AGW theory does explain all of the directly observed evidence, therefore it's the accepted science. If you want to change the status quo, you'll need to provide your own theory that explains all the observed evidence. That's how science works. You won't get your theory accepted just by complaining, you have to show how it matches the real world. AGW theory has done that.
Most deniers won't even try to state a theory. Yelling "natural cycles!" is certainly not a theory. Natural cycles have causes. Tell us the specific cause, and show how that theory matches the observed data. That's the #1 reason why deniers are ridiculed. They make it a point of pride to refuse to do any science, but still demand their unsupported assertions be accepted as fact.
And in fact has gone so far as to FALSIFY real world historical data sets to try and hide the fact that the computer models are crap.
No, that's a cult conspiracy theory. And it's the #2 reason why most of the planet holds deniers in such low esteem.