Fiftyseven
Rookie
- Nov 2, 2016
- 13
- 3
- 1
Is it just me or have you also noticed that Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sanders, and President Obama have been silent about the protests?
The very people who have the power to stop these protests and riots with just a few well-spoken words have been completely silent on the issue.
Hillary Clinton
During her concession speech, Clinton said, āWe must accept this result, and then look to the future. ā¦ Donald Trump is going to be our president. We owe him an open mind and the chance to lead.ā
After that, she has been mum on the entire thing.
Hillary Clinton could have asked her followers to stop this nonsense, and they probably would have listened out of respect for her. (Misplaced respect but thatās a whole different article.) Instead, her silence makes me think that she is hidden away, relishing the chaos. That she has done nothing to attempt to calm the situation underlines the fact that she was not fit to govern. A leader would look out for the best interests of a country they love, rather than watching from afar to apply balm to her wounded ego.
Instead, her Twitter is full of Bible quotes (huh?) and mentions nary a word about the protests. It has not been updated since the day after her failed bid.
Bernie Sanders
Bernie Sanders, the one from whom the Democratic primary was fraudulently stolen, the one who backed up Hillary Clinton anyway, has also been uncharacteristically silent, especially for an aging peace-and-love hippie kind of guy.
He hasnāt once asked the protesters to be peaceful or to give Trump a chance, but he has fueled the fire with his cries for them to remain vigilant. Heās already opposing Trump before the guy even gets inaugurated.
Even in his essay for the NY Times yesterday, entitled āWhere Do Democrats Go From Here?ā he did not gently suggest to his supporters that they turn toward peace. He had the opportunity, the platform, and the love from his followers, and his choice to remain silent tells me that he is just as self-serving as the other politicians, despite his humble, grandfatherly demeanor.
President Obama
Then thereās the President, who met cordially with Trump. His Twitter account is likewise mute on the subject of vandalism, arson, and violence in reaction to the election.
Note to President Obama: I didnāt like it when you were elected either, but I burned neither flags nor effigies. I peacefully dissented throughout your administration but never damaged one single item of property. You screwed the middle class with your horrible health care catastrophe, and yet no one rioted in the streets when you were re-elected to screw us for another four years.
Obamaās only statement of semi-support was on Wednesday, when he said, āāThe peaceful transfer of power is one of the hallmarks of our democracy. Weāre actually all on the same team.ā
His statement about the riots was via his press secretary.
White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest, asked Thursday about the protests, said the president believes the right to free speech should be protected.
He added, āIt is a right that should be exercised without violence. And there are people who are disappointed in the outcome. And the presidentās message in the Rose Garden was itās not surprising that people are disappointed in the outcome, but itās important for us to remember, a day or two after the election, that weāre Democrats and Republicans, but weāre Americans and patriots first.ā
This wonāt end well.
Kellyanne Conway, Trumpās campaign manager, sees it the same way. She has called on Obama and Clinton to address the violence, but thus far, her request seems to have fallen on willfully deaf ears.
Not cool. @POTUS or Hillary should address. āPeople Have to Dieā: Anti-Trump Protester Calls For Violence on CNN https://t.co/NfEqhkrTvu
ā Kellyanne Conway (@KellyannePolls) November 10, 2016
Not accepting the result and keeping up the protests will lead to nowhere except more trouble as the contagion of anger spreads. It is only a matter of time before it really gets out of hand and people start dying.
Source (with video)
The very people who have the power to stop these protests and riots with just a few well-spoken words have been completely silent on the issue.
Hillary Clinton
During her concession speech, Clinton said, āWe must accept this result, and then look to the future. ā¦ Donald Trump is going to be our president. We owe him an open mind and the chance to lead.ā
After that, she has been mum on the entire thing.
Hillary Clinton could have asked her followers to stop this nonsense, and they probably would have listened out of respect for her. (Misplaced respect but thatās a whole different article.) Instead, her silence makes me think that she is hidden away, relishing the chaos. That she has done nothing to attempt to calm the situation underlines the fact that she was not fit to govern. A leader would look out for the best interests of a country they love, rather than watching from afar to apply balm to her wounded ego.
Instead, her Twitter is full of Bible quotes (huh?) and mentions nary a word about the protests. It has not been updated since the day after her failed bid.
Bernie Sanders
Bernie Sanders, the one from whom the Democratic primary was fraudulently stolen, the one who backed up Hillary Clinton anyway, has also been uncharacteristically silent, especially for an aging peace-and-love hippie kind of guy.
He hasnāt once asked the protesters to be peaceful or to give Trump a chance, but he has fueled the fire with his cries for them to remain vigilant. Heās already opposing Trump before the guy even gets inaugurated.
Even in his essay for the NY Times yesterday, entitled āWhere Do Democrats Go From Here?ā he did not gently suggest to his supporters that they turn toward peace. He had the opportunity, the platform, and the love from his followers, and his choice to remain silent tells me that he is just as self-serving as the other politicians, despite his humble, grandfatherly demeanor.
President Obama
Then thereās the President, who met cordially with Trump. His Twitter account is likewise mute on the subject of vandalism, arson, and violence in reaction to the election.
Note to President Obama: I didnāt like it when you were elected either, but I burned neither flags nor effigies. I peacefully dissented throughout your administration but never damaged one single item of property. You screwed the middle class with your horrible health care catastrophe, and yet no one rioted in the streets when you were re-elected to screw us for another four years.
Obamaās only statement of semi-support was on Wednesday, when he said, āāThe peaceful transfer of power is one of the hallmarks of our democracy. Weāre actually all on the same team.ā
His statement about the riots was via his press secretary.
White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest, asked Thursday about the protests, said the president believes the right to free speech should be protected.
He added, āIt is a right that should be exercised without violence. And there are people who are disappointed in the outcome. And the presidentās message in the Rose Garden was itās not surprising that people are disappointed in the outcome, but itās important for us to remember, a day or two after the election, that weāre Democrats and Republicans, but weāre Americans and patriots first.ā
This wonāt end well.
Kellyanne Conway, Trumpās campaign manager, sees it the same way. She has called on Obama and Clinton to address the violence, but thus far, her request seems to have fallen on willfully deaf ears.
Not cool. @POTUS or Hillary should address. āPeople Have to Dieā: Anti-Trump Protester Calls For Violence on CNN https://t.co/NfEqhkrTvu
ā Kellyanne Conway (@KellyannePolls) November 10, 2016
Not accepting the result and keeping up the protests will lead to nowhere except more trouble as the contagion of anger spreads. It is only a matter of time before it really gets out of hand and people start dying.
Source (with video)
