Interesting that you find it wrong and a negative when a politician goes against the interest of a financial contributor. Somehow the Republican mindset has come to agree with the kleptocrats that large financial contributions should equate to automatic support for the special interest of the donor. To not do so makes the politician bad.Her policy proposals consist of giving out free shit and promising to punish the very people who have enriched her over the years. I.e. she completely lacks credibility.What I find interesting about this thread is that it is progressing pretty much as I thought it would.
A LOT of material was presented in the OP and very little of it is actually being debated.
Instead, a great many Righties are frothing at the mouth and are showing a complete lack of ability to focus on anything. Lots of growling, flaming, trolling, and very little attention to actual content.
Oh, and before you frothers accuse me of partisanship, I will remind that I invested a HUGE amount of time on the Rand Paul announcement speech OP:
Rand Paul s platform within his speech 15 points worth debating US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum
And in case you all have forgotten, Rand Paul is a Republican.
To recapitulate, Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton told her public at her first public rally that there are four fights that she wants to fight for the American people as the 45th president, should she be elected. She went through a long list of policy proposals. There is plenty of material to sift through, analyse and then criticize, if you want to, and the vast majority of it is quoted in the OP. Calling her names or just saying that she sucks only serves to make Righties look like utter fools. And your behaviour proves what Lefties often say about Conservatives not being able to think, that all they do is to froth at the mouth.
I give Righties the good advice to learn to actually debate like real adults. Really, the slime you spread all over USMB - just because you are perpetually butthurt - has gone from shameful for you to embarrassing for all of us. Truly, truly, truly.
-Stat
Only a fake poseur like you could possibly take anything she says seriously. Hell, she admitted to Obama her support for Iraq was based on political polling. But so is every other position she takes. And she will abandon them in a heartbeat if the polls tell her otherwise.
Interesting that you think she would actually go against the financial interests of her financial contributors. She has a history of lying, what would make you believe she is telling the truth at this point and time?