- Dec 18, 2013
- 137,112
- 28,174
- 2,180
There are no criminal statutes. I already told you.See post 259 which describes the presidential records act and the criminal statue.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
There are no criminal statutes. I already told you.See post 259 which describes the presidential records act and the criminal statue.
Again if we raided a former Presidents house because he kept some records he wasnt supposed to we've turned a corner. I think the records issue was a pretense to raid a former Presidents house many in the establishment hated, and that's a problem.It is a crime and there is punish.
The presidential records, U.S.C. §§ 2201–2209 defines what are presidential records and makes clear that they are government property. It is not a criminal statue but
18 U.S.C. section 641 is and it covers taking and destroying government property and punishment of a fine or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both. Whether it is serious or not depends on what was taken and what was destroyed.
Looks like I’m right, you’re welcomeIt is a crime and there is punish.
The presidential records, U.S.C. §§ 2201–2209 defines what are presidential records and makes clear that they are government property. It is not a criminal statue but
18 U.S.C. section 641 is and it covers taking and destroying government property and punishment of a fine or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both. Whether it is serious or not depends on what was taken and what was destroyed.
No. The DOJ, had no interest in raiding Trump's House until it became clear beyond a reasonable doubt that he had classified documents. Luckily they found them. God knows what Trump planned to do with them. That might be one of the questions for Trump at his trial. He would of course take the 5th even thou he said “If you’re innocent, why are you taking the Fifth Amendment?”Again if we raided a former Presidents house because he kept some records he wasnt supposed to we've turned a corner. I think the records issue was a pretense to raid a former Presidents house many in the establishment hated, and that's a problem.
Reading Fail.Comprehension fail.
The warrant included any documents created during Trump's term that he illegally had at Mar-A-Lago.
Like, say, a Top Secret/SCI war plan against Russia which was created during his term.
All caught up now?
First of all, Trump didn't steal or destroy Presidential records. Second, NARA KNEW where they were. They inspected them in JUNE!! Let's see Obama's 30 million records that he claims is somewhere in the ethernet.It is a crime and there is punish.
The presidential records, U.S.C. §§ 2201–2209 defines what are presidential records and makes clear that they are government property. It is not a criminal statue but
18 U.S.C. section 641 is and it covers taking and destroying government property and punishment of a fine or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both. Whether it is serious or not depends on what was taken and what was destroyed.
What did Hillary plan to do with her 33 million missing classified/secret emails? What did Obama plan to do with his 30 million classified/secret documents? Where is the FBI? DOJ? CIA? WTF!!!I think the most important question is not being asked. What did he plan on doing with the most secret of secret documents in the country? If this were you or I, the answer would be obvious to the FBI and a jury.
There is no evidence that Hillary or Obama has any classified documents and I serious doubt the US has 30 million classified documents. However we know Trump had classified documents. Trump's lawyer signed a receipt for them.What did Hillary plan to do with her 33 million missing classified/secret emails? What did Obama plan to do with his 30 million classified/secret documents? Where is the FBI? DOJ? CIA? WTF!!!
Apparently Trump is more forthcoming than Obama or Hilary.There is no evidence that Hillary or Obama has any classified documents and I serious doubt the US has 30 million classified documents. However we know Trump had classified documents. Trump's lawyer signed a receipt for them.
YES, he did, moron.First of all, Trump didn't steal or destroy Presidential records.
No, they didn't.Second, NARA KNEW where they were. They inspected them in JUNE!!
All you have to do is look for them.Let's see Obama's 30 million records that he claims is somewhere in the ethernet.
Hahaha. You should send to mueller. He missed it
You ignore law sir
1. Yes there is. Comey said as much on live freaking TV.There is no evidence that Hillary or Obama has any classified documents and I serious doubt the US has 30 million classified documents. However we know Trump had classified documents. Trump's lawyer signed a receipt for them.
Total Banana Republican fishing expedition.
The warrant is so specific that in line c., it demands... every Presidential record created during Donald Trump's entire term. Every single one.
So yeah, this is a super-specific warrant.
View attachment 681556
View attachment 681557
He stole US people's documents...Yep, this would all be just a bad joke if it wasn't such a serious escalation by the UNiparty against DT & by proxy, all of his supporters & all those who still want a free America.
They have dragged us into dangerous new territory & it wasn't just by stupidity or incompetence.
There's a deeper plan here that isn't just about preventing DT from running again
He stole US people's documents...
He was given plenty chances to give them back...
This is over 18 months later... You go act like this after getting fired from your job...
Actually any document created in the Trump Administration is considered property of the US People...Comprehension fail.
The warrant included any documents created during Trump's term that he illegally had at Mar-A-Lago.
Like, say, a Top Secret/SCI war plan against Russia which was created during his term.
All caught up now?
It was very clear there was a high volume of documents and the ex-President was given ample opportunity to return them..Again if we raided a former Presidents house because he kept some records he wasnt supposed to we've turned a corner. I think the records issue was a pretense to raid a former Presidents house many in the establishment hated, and that's a problem.