Why is it always conservatives starting threads about a civil war?
why is it leftists out there running amok trying to start one?
They're not trying to start one.
They want a cultural revolution and they're pissed off and offended that so many folks are willing to use force to prevent them from bullying their way into one.
Wanting police reform is not an attempt to start a civil war. That's all in your mind.
Are you going to pretend that that is what all this is about?
(You ain't real big on honesty, are you?)
I figured you were talking about the last wave of riots that started from the Chauvin thing.
There are other protests and riots. America has a long history of them.
But no, they're not trying to start a civil war.
To the extent that they are hoping to achieve their goal without any serious opposition, you're right.
That's why so many of ya'll get so agitated at the idea of a "civil war"; you are upset that people are willing to meet your demands with force.
It's the same dynamic as when a high school bully has to actually fight one of his intended victims, rather than them just submitting. The bully get's all pissed off and a little scared at the defiance.
That's you folks, all day.
What fight? There is no fight. Just you constantly threatening to fight.
There's that complete lack of honesty again.....
When someone warns you to stop doing something before you get shot, they are giving you instructions on how to
avoid violence. You are simply too dishonest to own your own behavior, and instead are insisting that it's all someone else's fault.
I'm not being dishonest. What I said should be perfectly obvious, but apparently it isn't to you.
There clearly is no fight. If we're talking about a school-yard right, then we're not at the part of the fight yet. You've been talking about this fight for a while now.
In this case, the boy in the school yard has been threatening a fight for years. I'll believe a fight when it happens, but I don't see it happening. Just all bluster from a bunch of idiots threatening to fight.


Let me know when you get done trying to reframe the discussion in your lame attempt to avoid reality.
You started the analogy. I went along with it and you can't refute what I said.
Except, no not really.
You still haven't refuted it. So yes, really.
Everytime they have confronted someone who refuses to back down, they either leave the area, get beat down, get run over, or die bleeding from GSWs,
that's the reality.
The "bluster" is all on the part of the protestors and rioters who claim they're going to the suburbs but who never seem to..... not for long, anyway, before they come hauling ass back out of there, with their tails tucked.
Truth is, most all of these protests which turn into riots, are deliberately held in areas where there is very little likelihood of encountering opposition, and that is by design.
Garrett Foster died in the downtown area of Austin, which is the most left wing part of the most left-wing city in the entire state of Texas and he got killed
the second he started shit with someone.
That sound like "bluster" to you?