When you launch an ill thought out war

[BackAgain]

moldy cock, the OP, has apparently discovered that any waging of “war” can prove to be the source of negative consequences.

 

[Stryder50]

You are in a hole, stop digging.

You are hot air with no intelligence.
No longer worth responding to.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

That is better than Iran having nukes to threaten the world with.

Which there is no evidence they have...or are even close to having.
Smells like a vaguely familiar excuse (2003).
It is liable to end up the same way.

So much for no more wars.

 

[Stryder50]

Blah, blah, blah. You should apply with FAUX "News." You have all the official talking points nailed. You'd get all sorts of Neocon gold stars (6 pointed, of course).

Well komrade I hope al jazzera pays you well to spread Islamist Jihad pravda.
You have all the anti-Jew, anti-USA talking points nailed.

 

[SaxonJackson]

Israel bombs the Islamic Jihad forces, such as Hamas, Hezbollah, etc. which those nations have allowed inside their borders so such can attack Israel.
It's known as self defense, and some times pre-emptive (preventing attack ability)

Are you really this stupid or just another Jew hater that enables Muslim violence against non-Muslims ?

The Goyim is still babbling out the same "official narrative" just like the mainstream "Fake News" has programmed him to do. Nice job. Gold Star (of David) to the winner of "repeat after me" award.

 

[BackAgain]

Bush used the same lie to invade Iraq

That’s retarded of you.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

That’s retarded of you.

Are you asserting that he didn't say this?
Cause..he did.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Before one launches a war, you have to look at the consequences, and decide whether it is worth the effort, and whether you have the logistics to back up that war. Already some unplanned for consequences are showing up. Yes, Iran deserves to be damaged, but what is the price the rest of the world, including us, will pay to do that? Will the result be worth it? And do we even have the logistical supplies to do the job?

The incompetence of the Trump regime.

 

[BackAgain]

Are you asserting that he didn't say this?
Cause..he did.

No. He sure didn’t, you imbecile.

Leftwhiner’s false claim, to remind you, was that Trump used “the same lie.”

One: It may have turned out differently than the concerns over Hussein’s alleged WMDs had predicted. But that alone doesn’t make it a “lie.” Words have actual meaning — except to you shitlibs.

Two: Leftwhiner’s sophistry would entail “W” having said something like, “Because IraN is close to creating nuclear weapons, therefore we must invade IraQ.” Of course the two compared rationales for choosing to take the military option are different.

In short, once again, our shitlibs make not a scintilla of sense.

 

[Independent thinker]

Before one launches a war, you have to look at the consequences, and decide whether it is worth the effort, and whether you have the logistics to back up that war. Already some unplanned for consequences are showing up. Yes, Iran deserves to be damaged, but what is the price the rest of the world, including us, will pay to do that? Will the result be worth it? And do we even have the logistical supplies to do the job?

What war?

 

[westwall]

Link ?
Or did you pull this out of your arse ?

Arse

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Arse

I miss you as a mod. You kept things even

 

[luiza]

I do worry that we are straining our munitions stockpile

If the radical shia dictatorship in iran holds on for many months that will be a problem

And yes, the stranglehold iran can exert via the Straight of Hormuz will hurt the world economy if it lasts too long

The actual estimate is one week even if they start rationing now .
Trumpfy was told repeatedly , but the Pot Noodle President thought that targeting a double handful of top figures who actually wanted martyrdom would solve everything .

Completely Dumb .
His whole bid for everlasting fame has gone up amidst laughter .

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

No. He sure didn’t, you imbecile.

Leftwhiner’s false claim, to remind you, was that Trump used “the same lie.”

One: It may have turned out differently than the concerns over Hussein’s alleged WMDs had predicted. But that alone doesn’t make it a “lie.” Words have actual meaning — except to you shitlibs.

Two: Leftwhiner’s sophistry would entail “W” having said something like, “Because IraN is close to creating nuclear weapons, therefore we must invade IraQ.” Of course the two compared rationales for choosing to take the military option are different.

In short, once again, our shitlibs make not a scintilla of sense.

Of course he did. For Christ sake. Are you dumb?...or just stupid? Seriously, you people are actual caricatures.
Trump literally said the same thing about Iran.

From 2002

 

[luiza]

Reactions:westwall

But not as dumb as someone who is as ill informed and as Cognitively Rigid as you are .

 

[westwall]

Reactions:westwall

But not as dumb as someone who is as ill informed and as Cognitively Rigid as you are .

Nah, that's you and your ilk. Sucks to be you watching your mad mullahs being sent to their virgin goats.

 

[airplanemechanic]

View attachment 1226381

That's a tid bit misleading.

None of those muslim countries supported the US strike until they took missiles up their rectums.

 

[Stryder50]

Which there is no evidence they have...or are even close to having.
Smells like a vaguely familiar excuse (2003).
It is liable to end up the same way.

So much for no more wars.

We haven't done "boots on the ground" in Iran and even if/when we do, unless we have a map with the "X" marks the spot to look, we might never know for sure.

Iraq experience provides some examples to go by.

First was the signs of truck and air cargo traffic out of Iraq and into Syria which many in Intel that was Saddam removing evidence and/or components of WMDs. Whether biological, chemical, or nuclear was never clear at the time and to date it appears uncertain where those shipments went to and what they were. Alternatively some claim the shipment was the other way around, the transport was of weapons out of Syria into Iraq to bolster Saddam's military armament.

https://gulfnews.com/uae/syrian-company-was-iraqs-top-weapons-source-1.374407

Second is the discover at Iraq airbases of combat jet aircraft buried under sand on edges of the bases. Most were not properly sealed prior to burial so likely would have been difficult to restore to flying condition.

https://www.warhistoryonline.com/aircraft/mig-25-desert.html

https://www.thetimes.com/world/us-world/article/iraqi-planes-found-buried-in-desert-2lmpn6wf2sg

Third is discovery of Iraq battle tanks buried in the sand. I got this account from my oldest son who was in Iraq with 1st Cav Div from April 2004 to April 2005 on occupation duty in Sadr City - Baghdad. Seems a humvee patrol outside the city in some unplanted farmland had a vehicle bump a large rock with it's bottom skidplate. This being a flood plan for centuries, finding large rocks is very rare. Some digging revealed a tank turret, then the full main battle tank. Further investigations found close to twenty MBTs buried in that location.

My point in this is that there might be other stuff buried in Iraq that hasn't yet been found or revealed~told to us.

Also, that we haven't begun to explore Iran which is significantly larger that Iraq, so I'd hesitate to claim there is nothing to be found, when searching hasn't even begun.

BTW, one actual WMD we did find in Iraq was an environmental one. Saddam had blocked water flow to the Southern coastal marshes, drying out a large area of coastal wetlands and wildlife habitat. Also seriously reduced the food resources of the 'Marsh Arabs' who lived there and had a few thousands years culture of that lifestyle. Curiously this gets little mention or traction, especially from the environmentalist advocates.

 

[luiza]

We haven't done "boots on the ground" in Iran and even if/when we do, unless we have a map with the "X" marks the spot to look, we might never know for sure.

Iraq experience provides some examples to go by.

First was the signs of truck and air cargo traffic out of Iraq and into Syria which many in Intel that was Saddam removing evidence and/or components of WMDs. Whether biological, chemical, or nuclear was never clear at the time and to date it appears uncertain where those shipments went to and what they were. Alternatively some claim the shipment was the other way around, the transport was of weapons out of Syria into Iraq to bolster Saddam's military armament.

https://gulfnews.com/uae/syrian-company-was-iraqs-top-weapons-source-1.374407

Second is the discover at Iraq airbases of combat jet aircraft buried under sand on edges of the bases. Most were not properly sealed prior to burial so likely would have been difficult to restore to flying condition.

https://www.warhistoryonline.com/aircraft/mig-25-desert.html

https://www.thetimes.com/world/us-world/article/iraqi-planes-found-buried-in-desert-2lmpn6wf2sg

Third is discovery of Iraq battle tanks buried in the sand. I got this account from my oldest son who was in Iraq with 1st Cav Div from April 2004 to April 2005 on occupation duty in Sadr City - Baghdad. Seems a humvee patrol outside the city in some unplanted farmland had a vehicle bump a large rock with it's bottom skidplate. This being a flood plan for centuries, finding large rocks is very rare. Some digging revealed a tank turret, then the full main battle tank. Further investigations found close to twenty MBTs buried in that location.

My point in this is that there might be other stuff buried in Iraq that hasn't yet been found or revealed~told to us.

Also, that we haven't begun to explore Iran which is significantly larger that Iraq, so I'd hesitate to claim there is nothing to be found, when searching hasn't even begun.

BTW, one actual WMD we did find in Iraq was an environmental one. Saddam had blocked water flow to the Southern coastal marshes, drying out a large area of coastal wetlands and wildlife habitat. Also seriously reduced the food resources of the 'Marsh Arabs' who lived there and had a few thousands years culture of that lifestyle. Curiously this gets little mention or traction, especially from the environmentalist advocates.

We have to put up with old Fuddy Duddy chaps like Trogs and Pestall
Other old farts also available .
Not the brightest flowers in the garden and they live in the past with their old attitudes and stereotypes .


This will wake them up from their stupor

 

[Stryder50]

We have to put up with old Fuddy Duddy chaps like Trogs and Pestall
Other old farts also available .
Not the brightest flowers in the garden and they live in the past with their old attitudes and stereotypes .


This will wake them up from their stupor

Another loonie channeling Baghdad Bob.