- Thread starter
- #241
Mostly Axis aircraft, German with a couple from Japan, and the title is obviously subjective opinion. Still, some interesting photos and worth some consideration, in generic sense.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All copied from the Me-262.At @ 49 minutes viewing time, this may seem a long video, but it is informative and interesting (even if some of the images and film are repeated at times.).
They make a good case for the B-47 being a major source of the "DNA" that shaped modern multi-engine jet design that would follow, not just military, but also commercial. Swept wings, engines in pods slung under the wings, and the tandem pattern main landing gear are some of the major contributions. Also significant procedural and operation systems spun out of experience with the Stratojet.
That Time America Built a Bomber So Advanced It Changed Everything
Sleek, deadly, and decades ahead of its time - the B-47 Stratojet changed aviation forever. It built the foundation for the modern jet age, even as its pilots risked their lives flying one of the most dangerous aircraft ever made.
Home website;
![]()
The video does acknowledge that the swept wing insight came from Nazi German research found when going through the research centers in fallen, occupied Germany.All copied from the Me-262.
The swept wing offered tremendous advantages in performance, so yeah. They had to adapt to them.The video does acknowledge that the swept wing insight came from Nazi German research found when going through the research centers in fallen, occupied Germany.
What was interesting is how competing bomber designs at the time had straight wings and engines embedded in the wings.
It also makes an interesting point how the B-47 design became a template of sorts for future commercial/passenger aircraft.
More interesting is some of the physical flight problems/issues unforeseen and also human systems changes that were presented and solved.
This is an interesting video. Unfortunately, like so many, takes about 30+ minutes to say what could have been done in 2-3 minutes.
Does make a valid point on one subject, which I've noticed over the years in my industrial production work, that often the "mechanics" have better insights and solutions than the "engineers".
How One Mechanic's "Stupid" Wire Trick Made P-38s Outmaneuver Every Zero
...
1,436,227 views Oct 26, 2025 #ww2history #ww2 #wwii
Why one aircraft mechanic installed unauthorized piano wire in P-38 control systems during WW2 — and saved 80 to 100 American pilots' lives. This World War 2 story reveals how a six-inch piece of wire changed aerial combat in the Pacific.
August 17, 1943. Technical Sergeant James McKenna, an aircraft mechanic with the Fifth Air Force at Dobodura airfield, New Guinea, watched another pilot prepare for a mission against Japanese Zeros. The P-38 Lightning was fast and powerful. But it couldn't turn with a Zero. The control cables had slack. A three-eighths inch delay between stick movement and aircraft response. That tiny delay was killing pilots. Every training manual said the cable tension was within specifications. Engineering officers called it acceptable tolerance.
They were all wrong.
What McKenna discovered that August morning wasn't about following regulations. It was about physics and leverage in a way that contradicted everything the Army approved. He bent a six-inch piece of piano wire into a Z-shape and installed it as a cable tensioner without authorization. Lieutenant Hayes flew the modified aircraft that morning and destroyed three Zeros in seven minutes. By September, forty P-38s had the modification spreading mechanic to mechanic across the Pacific. And pilots survived.
This technique spread unofficially through fighter squadrons crew chief to crew chief, improving kill ratios from two-to-one against Americans to nearly even before Lockheed integrated it into the P-38J model. The principles discovered at Dobodura continued to influence aircraft control systems through the Vietnam War.
...
You'll have me chasing down another source that might confirm this tale, but the cable slack and resulting tension fix sounds plausible to me.What made the P-38 turn better was differential throttle on the engines, and the Fowler flaps.
You had to be an accomplished pilot to do it, but this story reeks of cow dung.
No aircraft maker will send an aircraft out with slack control cables.You'll have me chasing down another source that might confirm this tale, but the cable slack and resulting tension fix sounds plausible to me.
If you listen to the first few minutes of the vid, the cable was within spec/tolerances, and had only a small fraction of an inch of play in it. Which the claim is the "Z" shaped piece of wire fixed, make response 'instant' rather than a fraction of second delay ...No aircraft maker will send an aircraft out with slack control cables.
That's a recipe for disaster.
There's no such thing as "instant" response from analog cables. It's a ridiculous claim. Furthermore, fighter pilots are flying their aircraft seconds ahead of where they actually are.If you listen to the first few minutes of the vid, the cable was within spec/tolerances, and had only a small fraction of an inch of play in it. Which the claim is the "Z" shaped piece of wire fixed, make response 'instant' rather than a fraction of second delay ...
The video was claiming another "3/4 second delay" after the pilot's mental/physical delay AND that this was something experienced in some of the aircraft. Controls felt 'mushy' compared to other aircraft flown.There's no such thing as "instant" response from analog cables. It's a ridiculous claim. Furthermore, fighter pilots are flying their aircraft seconds ahead of where they actually are.
No matter the claims made in the video, pilots aren't super human, they still have that 3/4 second delay for their response.
And ALL fighter pilots agree that their vision was far more important than simple reflexes. The ability to spot the enemy at distance was by far the most important part of a dogfight.
Actually, the P-38 was by far the most versatile American fighter of the war. It was a fighter, a dive bomber, could also do level bombing, photo recon, weather flights, etc.A couple of clips/links on one of the better fighters of World War 2, the P-47 Thunderbolt.
P‑47 Thunderbolt - The Heavyweight Fighter that Helped Win WWII
The P‑47 Thunderbolt was one of the largest and most heavily armed fighter aircraft of WWII. Built around the powerful Pratt & Whitney R‑2800 engine, it combined speed, durability, and firepower. Though not as sleek as other fighters, its rugged design allowed it to excel in escort and ground attack missions. By 1944, its impact on the European air war was undeniable.
9 brilliant things about the P-47 Thunderbolt
The P-47 Thunderbolt was the most versatile fighter aircraft of the Second World War.
It was not “best in class” in any category, however, it was very good in just about every category. Fast, long-legged and well-armed, it was also the most survivable fighter of the entire war. In scale and concept, the P-47 was a design outlier, and was different from every other fighter of the war.
It's bullshit. The same group put out a video claiming some crew chief bent the prop of a F4U Corsair and increased the speed by 40mph.The video was claiming another "3/4 second delay" after the pilot's mental/physical delay AND that this was something experienced in some of the aircraft. Controls felt 'mushy' compared to other aircraft flown.
1) Did you actually watch the video ?It's bullshit. The same group put out a video claiming some crew chief bent the prop of a F4U Corsair and increased the speed by 40mph.
That's absurd. First, you don't bend props. If it is one tenth of a degree off the vibration pulls the engine off of the mounts.
Secondly, ALL F4U's came with variable pitch props, so there would have been no benefit from bending the prop blade.
Like I said, their claims are bullshit. I'm a pilot. I have over 6,000 hours on multiple types. I actually am friends with fighter pilots, and test pilots. One of my best friends, who is now sadly passed away, was the director of the Test Pilot School at Edwards. I actually know what I'm talking about.