Gun Show Loophole

I understand your reasoning but once you start targeting one race the world will be screaming it's government authorized genocide.
Of course but it doesn't hurt to remind these stupid uneducated Moon Bats that the gun violence in this country is mostly in the Democrat controlled ghetto areas perpetrated by the Democrat's special interest groups.
 

Here it is Meister
That's not a gun show loophole.

You can do that at your own home or almost any other place. No gun show needed
 
That's not a gun show loophole.

You can do that at your own home or almost any other place. No gun show needed
They call it gun show loophole because the name gun show, house, office, parking lot, restaurant and city street loophole was too cumbersome.
 
Of course but it doesn't hurt to remind these stupid uneducated Moon Bats that the gun violence in this country is mostly in the Democrat controlled ghetto areas perpetrated by the Democrat's special interest groups.
Like Buffalo?
 
Like Buffalo?
Look at my graph. White gun violence is not zero. It is very low like in countries that have stringent gun control laws. Black and Brown gun crime is high.




1653486379865.png
 
Like Buffalo?
Exactly like Buffalo.

where the killer required a background check when he bought the firearm, and a license to purchase both the firearm and the ammo.

and, according to the Manifest he posted online, was far from the right winger you make him out to be.
 
Who cares, make it as hard as possible. Ban them for everyone except law enforcement + have mandatory gun buybacks so folks turn them in.
.

Not happening ... And the Government you want to create the ban ...
Is the same Government that put the first fully automatic assault weapon (and more) in my hands.

It was okay enough for them. for me to carry it all over this planet.

.
 
Whew!!
Good morning, Viet N-A-M!!!

This thread is a veritable Country Buffet of ideas and thoughts to comment on.
Let's start:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Dude you're one more troll comment from ignore. Choose wisely"
Oh boy, now there is a warning to heed. I suppose.
Regardless, I am still saddened that we have posters who are so fearful that they call strangers names and then dare 'em to come take their guns. Whiskey Tango Foxtrot!
Has the American education system failed so miserably that adult discourse cannot proceed without epithets and threats?
Sad.
Bigly.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

  • Only the militia shall be well regulated.
  • the Militia, and the people. 'well regulated' refers only to the militia.
  • Militia===males of sound mind and body between the ages of 16-45. the People. EVERY fucking body.
And, importantly, the regulation would be of those people who are armed --and their arms --- and who CAN or do serve in a militia capacity.
The clear implication is that the people would be the militia. The Bill of Rights says nothing about stratifying the people by age.
Anyone could ---and did ---serve in the militia. Hence, they and their armament need be regulated. If you have an arm you qualify for the militia.
You qualify for this so called 'well regulated'.

that was the standard in those days.
Ah, that is an 'originalist' argument that can be a slippery slope for the gun lobby: "Standard" of the day.
OK, sure. Let's go there.
Like the Brown Bess. The muzzle-loader. The flintolock.
And NOT the Glock21 of today, or the SigSauer 556xi ....and their like.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Another chickenshit cop out evasion by a gun-grabbing pussy ........... Run chicken run."
"EVERY FUCKING THING Joe Biden has done since in office........".
The anger evidenced by some folks on social media hints that perhaps they just may not be suitable for owning any of today's super high lethality firearms.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rittenhouse, while IMO he had no business being there was shown in a court of law to be self defense. Not applicable.
Well, it is applicable in that he illegally acquired that weapon. And should have been held accountable for the crime.
Not to mention, the straw purchaser of the weapon. He should have been punished to the full extent of the statute.
When trading, exchanging, trafficking in guns is done outside the law......when caught, the perpetrators need be punished to the fullest extent. How else to convey society's seriousness-of-purpose over the perceived threat that firearms pose?
--------------------------------------------------------------------


Every place in your post that uses the word "gun"--replace "gun" with "pressure cooker" Does that make sense to you. Anything can and has been lethal when used by a determined murderer
Oh, you bet Concerned. Lots of things have been used to kill people....rocks, knives, rakes, dog leashes, pressure cookers.
But you see, they are all different than a portable, high-capacity, easily concealed, rapid-fire, high lethality tool like a modern pistol or rifle.
And therein lies the concern. Steven Paddock didn't go up to the 33rd floor of the Mandalay hotel with an assortment of pressure-cookers.
If only he would have.
Maybe 59 would not have been killed, and 527 injured?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Universal background checks won’t stop private intrastate gun transactions between residents of the same state from buying and selling guns.
Make private sales regulated too. Even between family members. Trafficking in today's weapons is NOT the same as trading baseball cards. Firearms are a unique tool. And as such should be defined in an altogether different category than say, and automobile, motorcycle, travel-trailer. Guns should come encumbered with them a set of laws and societal expectations that clearly and unambiguously signal to the possessors or would-be possessors that they have an increased responsibility to society.
Major responsibility.
Analogous, perhaps, to the responsibility of owning, say, a case of dynamite. Anything that goes wrong with that dynamite....if it injures or damages anybody or anything....the owner of the case is responsible. It is a "strict liability" tool.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

You see, I don't give a fuck about the GOP. I'm not a partisan hack bullshit motherfucker like you.
Please see above, about the concerns that some people may simply not be suited for possessing today's portable, high-lethality, easily concealed, rapid-fire, high-capacity firearms.
As evidenced by their demeanor exhibited on social media.
Just sayin'.
 

Forum List

Back
Top