Gun Control Is NOT The Answer!

[woodwork201]

So... no. It doesn't.
Thus, not all restrictions are infringements.

Shooting is not keeping or bearing. Completely different topic.

 

[woodwork201]

Congress does not have the authority to enact infringements, as all the powers of Congress are modified by the 2nd Amendment.

Then if they do not have the right to infringe the law banning felons from owning guns is unconstitutional and due process cannot protect the government in supporting the application of the law.

 

[bodecea]

The butchers answer to every shooting is to take guns away from the people who didn't do it.

We know who the REAL butchers are.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Shooting is not keeping or bearing. Completely different topic.

The "use" of a firearm, under the protection of the 2nd, commonly, if not most often, involves shooting said firearm
Thus, referring to the restriction in question, not all restrictions are infringements.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Then if they do not have the right to infringe the law banning felons from owning guns is unconstitutional...

Rights may be removed thru due process.
The state cannot infringe on a right someone does not have.

 

[woodwork201]

The "use" of a firearm, under the protection of the 2nd, commonly, if not most often, involves shooting said firearm
Thus, referring to the restriction in question, not all restrictions are infringements.

Have you never read the 2nd Amendment? Where in the Amendment is the word, "use"? Gawd, you are one stupid fucking idiot. You're why we will soon be without our guns. When the people who pretend to defend the right to keep and bear arms are, in actuality, defending the Government's ever increasing infringements, the battle is already lost.

 

[woodwork201]

Rights may be removed thru due process.
The state cannot infringe on a right someone does not have.

I've provided you with the original intent, even from modern analysis, of due process and it is not what you are claiming. Nowhere does it say the government can strip any right with due process. They can exercise the powers given in the Constitution only when providing due process. If they didn't already have the authority then due process doesn't give it to them.

Once again, you prove that you have already surrendered any liberty that you have and you're just arguing, begging, that the government doesn't take all your rights, with you having already agreed with them that they have the power to take them.