One of my brothers is a retired US Marine who received a medical discharge
and lump sum settlement in the early 90's for epilepsy which was caused by the anthrax vaccine
they made everyone take before sending them to the Persian Gulf .
He can't have children and is on daily meds but he's married and seems happy--still working as a
mechanic in Hawaii.
Now here's my question. How many people know about these anthrax vaccines, are they still administering them and why ? Also since I made the topic GWS, anyone know of people dealing with the depleted uranium issues, the microchip implants or any other similar situations ?
My friend was 1 of the people on the GWS panel Ross Perot took in front of the politicians questioning.
I had my theories on the sickness being radiation from the equipment.
It wasn't till much later that I heard other possibilities like the vaccines given.
They also had chem fallout drills that weren't very successful If I remember correctly.
And also one thing not discussed is the fact that a lot of people were exposed to Sarin and other chemical weapons.
Thanks to Wikileaks and other sources, we now know that both in 1990-1991 a lot were exposed to Iraqi chemical weapons. And most of the symptoms of "GWS" are also the same as exposure to Sarin nerve agents.
Especially as those in other countries that were not given Anthrax (including soldiers from Saudi Arabia and France) also experience Gulf War Syndrome. Therefore, most now look to Sarin and other chemical weapons as the true culprit.
And they couldn't tell us about the Sarin and admit that Bush and others were right about Iraq having Chem weapons, making our mission there justified. We notice this media blackout now, because the veil has been lifted from our eyes on how the narrative and propaganda is shaped by these missinformation campaigns.
We in the military have been aware of this for decades, and the reason why.
One thing about the US, we have long stated that is "Weapons of Mass Destruction" are used against us, we will respond in kind. However, since the 1980's we have destroyed all of our chemical weapons, and our only response now is with a nuke.
And as bad as Saddam was in launching chemical weapons at our troops was, I do agree that responding with nuking them would have been overboard. Therefore, the "plausible deniability" of stating that the chemical detectors were giving "faulty alarms" was accepted. Even though we have even had Congressional reports among those who have witnessed such happening over and over is now a matter of public record.
We know they were used in 1990-1991, and we know they were found all over the country after 2003. I find the denial of some today absolutely mind boggling, especially after both Wikileaks and the nation of Iraq itself have turned over a great many bunkers and locations to the UN.
I actually do accept the denial at the time, as part of simply politics, and not wanting to escalate to the response that many think we should have done. We had to, or else many nations might have doubted our resolve to protect them in the event such an attack was used against them. But the proof that they had and used such weapons is overwhelming, and notice that millions have had Anthrax vaccinations in the last 20 years, yet there have been no outbreaks of "Gulf War Syndrome" in the decades since. We have had a continual presence in that region since 1990, but all the cases happened over a year.
That all by itself screams it was something else. Not the anthrax vaccine, not environmental factors, it was something specific to that one conflict.
And hell, look no farther than the 1995 Shoko Asahara Sarin attack on the Tokyo subway. Where over 1,000 have been placed on disability, with almost the exact same long term conditions that those with "Gulf War Syndrome" are suffering from.
www.usmessageboard.com
