Greenland says they don't want to join America

Trump says we need to own Greenland for international security reasons. He's never said what those reasons are. Can anyone here come up with a rational reason that we have to overtake them since we already buy all the resources we ask for, and we already have a military presence there. No indication that any of that is going to change.

We shouldn't. Of all the things I support, this isn't one. Can't wrap my head around Trump wanting to annex Greenland, a la Putin and Crimea. It's stupid and would cause upheaval in the UN and the world order. America would be viewed in the same vein as Russia.

This is unwise. I pray Trump doesn't do something this foolish.
 
  • Funny
Reactions: Z99
We shouldn't. Of all the things I support, this isn't one. Can't wrap my head around Trump wanting to annex Greenland, all Putin and Crimea. It's stupid and would cause upheaval in the UN and the world order. America would be viewed in the same vein as Russia.

This is unwise. I pray Trump doesn't do something this foolish.
Do you have the same thoughts about Canada and Panama?
 
Sure, he wants those things but I think the reason is deeper. He is a megalomaniac with Hitler like dreams of ruling the world. In other words, that fat orange loser is just nuts.
Off course he is just nuts - only a megalomaniac will come up with such "plans" ideas - to get himself onto Mount Rushmore.
Whilst trying to make some billions for himself.
 
Trump says we need to own Greenland for international security reasons. He's never said what those reasons are. Can anyone here come up with a rational reason that we have to overtake them since we already buy all the resources we ask for, and we already have a military presence there. No indication that any of that is going to change.


It is critical for America, Canada and Europes security that if and when Russia or China decide to attack Greenland that they do not do so successfully.

Do you realize how close Canada is to Greenland? How about the straight path to Europe? It is the perfect staging ground for any serious military and it has a large amount of critical minerals which an advanced economy can utilize.

I find it a bit creepy how the world pretends they care about Greenland if America were to absorb it and turn them into citizens but they are ok that an old relic monarchy in Denmark is their ultimate overlord.

Pompous, illogical, low investment Europeans to the rescue again...

The citizens of Greenland can choose for themselves what direction they would like to pursue. THe world doesn't want America to absorb them because it will weaken ALL of Europes old, declining kingdoms since America would be a great benefit to the citizens of Greenland. China and Russia in particular would be heavily against this pursuit as they have their eyes ultimately on that piece of real estate.

They are an independent nation so why not have a referendum after some lobbying by American politician?
 
Last edited:
It is critical for America, Canada and Europes security that if and when Russia or China decide to attack Greenland that they do not do so successfully.

Do you realize how close Canada is to Greenland? How about the straight path to Europe? It is the perfect staging ground for any serious military and it has a large amount of critical minerals which an advanced economy can utilize.

I find it a bit creepy how the world pretends they care about Greenland if America were to absorb it and turn them into citizens but they are ok that an old relic monarchy in Denmark is their ultimate overlord.

Pompous, illogical, low investment Europeans to the rescue again...

The citizens of Greenland can choose for themselves what direction they would like to pursue. THe world doesn't want America to absorb them because it will weaken ALL of Europes old, declining kingdoms since America would be a great benefit to the citizens of Greenland. China and Russia in particular would be heavily against this pursuit as they have their eyes ultimately on that piece of real estate.

They are an independent nation so why not have a referendum after some lobbying by American politician?
We already have a military presence there and in Canada. There would be no problem increasing our forces to any level if those events occurred. They would be glad for the help.
 
Trump says we need to own Greenland for international security reasons. He's never said what those reasons are. Can anyone here come up with a rational reason that we have to overtake them since we already buy all the resources we ask for, and we already have a military presence there. No indication that any of that is going to change.


trump never gives reasons for anything he says he'll do because he knows his maga Sheep will believe anything because they can't think for themselves.
 
It is critical for America, Canada and Europes security that if and when Russia or China decide to attack Greenland that they do not do so successfully.

Nobody is going to attack Greenland.
 
Nobody is going to attack Greenland.
Or Ukraine, or Israel or Poland, or Taiwan.

Nations get attacked, often when we least expect it.

The fact that Russia and China have BOTH been expanding their territories for years while the least impressive among us screamed that "climate change" was going to destroy all of humanity just gets my blood boiling. Credit to the MSS for getting these muppets and their greedy political friends to parrot the "threat" (while China expanded their pollution and coal production) should offend anyone with ample cerebral activity.

Hundreds of thousands of people have died in wars that were potentially avoidable, but hey, why not pretend that Greenland which is defended by Denmark is a unique case.

America should and must put forward their offer to the citizens there and outline why America needs a major presence or more there. The fact that Putin doesn't like the idea should wet the knickers of so many people who despise him,
 
Yes, Canada too. But I'm not so sure about Panama. I think that has more to do with China and less to do with the Panamanians.
China owned some ports at either end of the canal as other people do. They had nothing to do with running the canal. Can you give specific examples of how China was controlling anything, other than their own ports?
 
China owned some ports at either end of the canal as other people do. They had nothing to do with running the canal. Can you give specific examples of how China was controlling anything, other than their own ports?
China is a superpower. That has a chilling effect on others owning the other ports there.
 
Lol. A reasonable discussion is not happening with you.
It wasn't just a flippant remark. Can you name any other world leader who tried to take over so many sovereign countries who are their allies other than Trump and Hitler?
 
Is that the Greenland invasion plan? Tariffs against nations not named Greenland?
You asked if he said he would invade? Why would he? Doesn’t mean he won’t, hence the trade war question. There’s no reason other than his bullying narcissistic character to be lying about Denmark and Greenland the way he is.
 
Trump says we need to own Greenland for international security reasons. He's never said what those reasons are. Can anyone here come up with a rational reason that we have to overtake them since we already buy all the resources we ask for, and we already have a military presence there. No indication that any of that is going to change.

~~~~~~
Really? Was there a public vote by the citizens of Greenland in regards to this decision, or is ithe a political response?
>>>>>>>>>> <<<<<<<<<<
"What has China done or indicated they might do to threaten canal operations?"

Since you're unaware of the situation as most people that follow Neo-Marxist Socialist Democrats blindly, here's some information that may enlighten and surprise you...

xxxxxxxxxx​
xxxxxxxxxx​
xxxxxxxxxx​
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom