Greenland's ice sheet has melted during our current ice age. It could melt again

[EMH]

wilfull stupidity can't be argued with, so now I know your issue. Your head isn't capable of expanding a thought. they call that a parrot.

Who am I parroting?

LOL!!

Your side tried this before...

Search the web and find the site I parrot...

LOL!!!

You are a seriously sick liar...

 

[Crick]

" Based on a sea level definition, we identify eleven interglacials in the last 800,000 years"

LOL!!!

North America melts 5+ million cubic miles of ice, and at the same time Greenland adds 700k+ and Antarctica adds... guestimate.... 500k.

So if they define it by " a sea level definition" they do not prove all melt or all add ice, not even close. In reality, this is another pseudo science load of shit.

Greenland froze while North America thawed.

That proves the "glacials" are complete bullshit, and it proves Co2 is not the cause of climate change.

Sea level shows glaciation because water gets tied up on land as ice and lowers sea level. When it melts, sea level rises.

 

[jc456]

Who am I parroting?

LOL!!

Your side tried this before...

Search the web and find the site I parrot...

LOL!!!

You are a seriously sick liar...

Ever hear one?

 

[EMH]

Sea level shows glaciation because water gets tied up on land as ice and lowers sea level. When it melts, sea level rises.

Very good!!

And WHERE is that ice on land on planet Earth?

What are the three land masses within 600 miles of an Earth pole?

Antarctica 90%
Greenland 7%
Ellesmere 0.3%

97.3% of Earth ice including sea ice on the three land masses closest to the poles.... and LAND MOVES

So how much ice would Earth have if Earth had two polar oceans aka no land near the poles...???

 

[EMH]

Ever hear one?

That is a confession that EMH parrots precisely nothing, nobody, and never has.

Parrots think everyone else is a parrot. Parrots are morons. Parrots cannot answer questions.

This parrot scanned the web, and found nothing...

LOL!!!

 

[jc456]

That is a confession that EMH parrots precisely nothing, nobody, and never has.

Parrots think everyone else is a parrot. Parrots are morons. Parrots cannot answer questions.

This parrot scanned the web, and found nothing...

LOL!!!

Psst, parrots repeat the same line over and over without knowing what it’s saying

 

[EMH]

Psst, parrots repeat the same line over and over without knowing what it’s saying

Psst, you've lied over and over, and you are still lying...

You accused EMH of parroting.

You have failed to find one single source on the web saying what EMH does.

A person of integrity would admit that. You have no integrity, which is why you are a taxpayer funded faux "climate skeptic" here....

 

[jc456]

Psst, you've lied over and over, and you are still lying...

You accused EMH of parroting.

You have failed to find one single source on the web saying what EMH does.

A person of integrity would admit that. You have no integrity, which is why you are a taxpayer funded faux "climate skeptic" here....

EMH can’t explain how ice buildup occurred on Greenland

 

[Crick]

Psst, you've lied over and over, and you are still lying...

You accused EMH of parroting.

You have failed to find one single source on the web saying what EMH does.

A person of integrity would admit that. You have no integrity, which is why you are a taxpayer funded faux "climate skeptic" here....

Why would the government fund climate skeptics anywhere, much less here?

 

[jc456]

Why would the government fund climate skeptics anywhere, much less here?

It’s science?

 

[EMH]

Why would the government fund climate skeptics anywhere, much less here?

Because they are "faux" skeptics, and big liars, and they aren't really interested in busting the Co2 FRAUD, they are interested in preventing it from being busted, which is why Toddster, jc, Ding and others continue lie, endlessly claim something answered over and over wasn't etc.

jc has been shown the evidence and explanation for Greenland a dozen times, and is right there a few posts up lying about it, and has lied about that at least a dozen times, and continues to lie, because he cannot and will not accept the actual explanation, because to do that would mean his unemployment, and likely prosecution.

It is the same Zionist Fascist tactic used to confuse the American people about the JFK assassination. Who are the "suspects?" The mob, the KKK, the Russians... everyone except who actually did it, the Mossad.

 

[Crick]

Because they are "faux" skeptics, and big liars, and they aren't really interested in busting the Co2 FRAUD, they are interested in preventing it from being busted, which is why Toddster, jc, Ding and others continue lie, endlessly claim something answered over and over wasn't etc.

jc has been shown the evidence and explanation for Greenland a dozen times, and is right there a few posts up lying about it, and has lied about that at least a dozen times, and continues to lie, because he cannot and will not accept the actual explanation, because to do that would mean his unemployment, and likely prosecution.

It is the same Zionist Fascist tactic used to confuse the American people about the JFK assassination. Who are the "suspects?" The mob, the KKK, the Russians... everyone except who actually did it, the Mossad.

I'm glad we've finally settled that. I think engaging you in conversation is probably detrimental to your mental health and it certainly doesn't do anyone else any good.

 

[EMH]

I'm glad we've finally settled that. I think engaging you in conversation is probably detrimental to your mental health and it certainly doesn't do anyone else any good.

There are still some basic climate questions you and the rest of the taxpayer funded Co2 FRAUD won't answer...

WHY?

 

[jc456]

There are still some basic climate questions you and the rest of the taxpayer funded Co2 FRAUD won't answer...

WHY?

you still haven't answered why there's miles of ice on Greenland?

 

[EMH]

you still haven't answered why there's miles of ice on Greenland?

Really, just how many times will this have to be posted before you stop lying about it....

Apparently we really need a "debate" over the term ICE AGE because y'all are all wrong...

What is an ICE AGE? Most apparently still believe it is a terrifying horror movie event where Earth all at once freezes up. The data has never supported such a scenario. Since 2010, there has been a massive effort to re-write Earth climate history into a series of rapid "glaciations" and ice...

www.usmessageboard.com

So what causes an ICE AGE?


Land moving near the poles. When land gets to within - roughly- 600 miles of a pole, as Greenland just did, the annual snowfall ceases to fully melt in the summer, and then it starts to stack. Stack for a million or 2 years = Greenland. Stack for 40+ million years = Antarctica. Ice ages like North American Ice Age end when the land moves outside of the 600 miles to a pole barrier.

Greenland and Antarctica are ice ages. Earth Climate Change is 99% about where land is. If Earth had two polar oceans, it would have no ice (much warmer). If Earth had two polar continents, two "Antarcticas" it would have roughly twice the ice, oceans would be lower, there would be a thinner atmosphere with less humidity, and it would be colder...




Your turn, sick taxpayer funded treasonous liar...

 

[jc456]

Really, just how many times will this have to be posted before you stop lying about it....

Apparently we really need a "debate" over the term ICE AGE because y'all are all wrong...

What is an ICE AGE? Most apparently still believe it is a terrifying horror movie event where Earth all at once freezes up. The data has never supported such a scenario. Since 2010, there has been a massive effort to re-write Earth climate history into a series of rapid "glaciations" and ice...

www.usmessageboard.com

So what causes an ICE AGE?


Land moving near the poles. When land gets to within - roughly- 600 miles of a pole, as Greenland just did, the annual snowfall ceases to fully melt in the summer, and then it starts to stack. Stack for a million or 2 years = Greenland. Stack for 40+ million years = Antarctica. Ice ages like North American Ice Age end when the land moves outside of the 600 miles to a pole barrier.

Greenland and Antarctica are ice ages. Earth Climate Change is 99% about where land is. If Earth had two polar oceans, it would have no ice (much warmer). If Earth had two polar continents, two "Antarcticas" it would have roughly twice the ice, oceans would be lower, there would be a thinner atmosphere with less humidity, and it would be colder...




Your turn, sick taxpayer funded treasonous liar...

Again, that doesn’t answer my question

 

[EMH]

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Not a rational entity

 

[Crick]

I thought only manmade, specifically American CO2, was responsible for warming

You thought wrong.

Are you now saying there are other variables to consider???

There have always been other variables to consider, but CO2 is the most significant.

You look out at your front yard and you notice that it's getting brown and dry. You also note that there are some weeds starting to creep over from the neighbors. While pulling a few you notice that weeds aren't the only thing coming over as you find several chinch bugs.

So, should you hold off on watering the lawn till you've pulled the weeds and treated it for chinch bugs? Would that be the SMART thing to do?

 

[EMH]

CO2 is the most significant

never mind highly correlated satellite and balloon data showing NO WARMING in the atmosphere despite rising Co2...

99% of Earth climate change is the position and movement of land near the poles...

 

[CrusaderFrank]

You thought wrong.

There have always been other variables to consider, but CO2 is the most significant.

You look out at your front yard and you notice that it's getting brown and dry. You also note that there are some weeds starting to creep over from the neighbors. While pulling a few you notice that weeds aren't the only thing coming over as you find several chinch bugs.

So, should you hold off on watering the lawn till you've pulled the weeds and treated it for chinch bugs? Would that be the SMART thing to do?

So you’re telling us that the imaginary observed “warming” since 1850, is fully explained by the one and only variable CO2, specifically American CO2.

All other factors: the Sun, the atmosphere, cosmic rays, ocean currents, water vapor, magnetic fields, etc. have experienced no change whatsoever

Is that what you’re saying? That these variables that previously changes in climate were negated by climate driving American CO2 starting in 1850?