What part of "They wouldn't allow the certified observers to observe the process" didn't you understand?They wouldn't allow the certified observers to observe the process, moron.ROFL! Sorry, turd, but the idea that citizens should not be allowed to videotape their government at work couldn't be more Stalinesque. You look at citizens as "interlopers." People wanting to make sure the votes are tabulated honestly and accurately are "interlopers."Why should video not be allowed?The Right Scoop? LOL. Where do you find these alt-right gems?
I find it highly suspect that anyone with video would be allowed close enough to film a recount with this much scrutiny.
Both parties have observers there. They are hired by the town/city/state and vetted and certified to be in the room months
in advance.
Because that video ends up on alt-right internet sites with no context and no explanation other than to verify the site's bias.
My guess is that the state is filming it. These operations are very tight. No room for screwing around. Any user error is immediately
checked, screened, re-checked, and verified.
You're a totalitarian bootlicking scumbag.
Tough shit. That's why states have election laws and certify their observers months in advance. Both parties sign off on them. This is so White Mike and Shelley Alt-Right can't gather propaganda for their YouTube podcast based on heresay, speculation, and conspiracy theories.
You, like the rest of Trump supporters, are a lemming.
The state has their own certified observers from both parties.
Aggrieved outsiders with their own agenda and narrative are not welcome...moron.
Correction. The state's certified observers are there. The observers that the Trump campaign sued to get in...are being kept back.