DukeU
Diamond Member
Yes, that's you. You even think "gawd did it!" explains stuff.
And with all your self proclaimed knowledge of Science, you ( the smart guy ) can no more prove how the universe was created than I can.
Be strong.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Yes, that's you. You even think "gawd did it!" explains stuff.
That's right. I.E., not at all.And with all your self proclaimed knowledge of Science, you ( the smart guy ) can no more prove how the universe was created than I can.
Thanks, I will.But you go ahead and do you.
I mean that. It harms nobody for you to believe in mythology. When you will run into problems is when you try to make others play with your toys.Thanks, I will.
I mean that. It harms nobody for you to believe in mythology. When you will run into problems is when you try to make others play with your toys.
If you want to emptily last word....Thanks again.
Be strong.
Atheism isn't possible. How did spacetime start? You don't know. Thus, your atheist scientists stole singulairty from the creationists. You and the thieving atheists lost already.
I know and proved it with KCA. You keep conveniently ignoring the evidence because of your atheism. The hard evidence of creation science becomes religion to you. If one's religion isn't true, then what good is it? That's why science backs up the Bible. Oh what's the point? You believe in things with no evidence and that which science doesn't back up.That's right
And you don't know either.
So you and many other religions attributed it to DIFFERENT gods.
So you don't know anything either, and you have NO extra-biblical/extra-babble evidence.
`
You proved it was god.. AND Haysoos no less!!!I know and proved it with KCA. You keep conveniently ignoring the evidence because of your atheism. The hard evidence of creation science becomes religion to you. If one's religion isn't true, then what good is it? That's why science backs up the Bible. Oh what's the point? You believe in things with no evidence and that which science doesn't back up.
I should get a comparable prize from the USMB S&T Forum. The proof is in the pudding. It also destroyed the atheist belief in an eternal universe. Now, you've had to change to another lie of evolution just to keep the atheist religion alive, but evolution was destroyed by Louis Pasteur and I with his swan neck experiment. No abiogenesis, no evolution It's why evolution has nothing observable..You proved it was god.. AND Haysoos no less!!!
Hasn't anyone at least suggested you for the Nobel Prize?
How about you get an extra year in the Insane retreat with free cookies and extra restraints!
`
I'm now adjusting that last tongue-in-cheek Nobel Pwize idea for your last "pwooof" to what I was seriously talking about, your insanity/delusions.I should get a comparable prize from the USMB S&T Forum. The proof is in the pudding. It also destroyed the atheist belief in an eternal universe. Now, you've had to change to another lie of evolution just to keep the atheist religion alive, but evolution was destroyed by Louis Pasteur and I with his swan neck experiment. No abiogenesis, no evolution It's why evolution has nothing observable..
Instead, what I get is pleasure in whipping you and the atheists here into submission and frustration.
You know I'm 100% positive and I positively destroyed evolution with the swan neck experiment. Of course, you can continue to practice atheism as a religion haha.I'm now adjusting that last tongue-in-cheek Nobel Pwize idea for your last "pwooof" to what I was seriously talking about, your insanity/delusions.
Now you claim you've disproved evolution too!!
And yet no one is listening.
Must be just the 'atheist' crowd on USMB.
Yeah, that's it Gomer!
You ******* Freak.
`
Yes, you've repealed Biology and replaced it with scripture Gomer!You know I'm 100% positive and I positively destroyed evolution with the swan neck experiment. Of course, you can continue to practice atheism as a religion haha.
Whatever happened to Duke?Thanks again.
Be strong.
Whatever happened to Duke?
You knew he was vanishing after all those -0- content answers.,
You don't disprove gods at all. You also can't disprove unicorns.You don't disprove God by arguing that the only way to prove he exists is "God of the gaps."
I believe in God because he is a real presence in my life.
Been there, done that.This is probably THEE #1 rationale for those arguing for a god on msg boards.
"Well then, did all this stuff just appear?".. "how did ___ if not god?"
And we can see several Fallacious OPs currently employing this boner.
If we can't explain it/explain it Yet, it must be 'god.'
The same Bogus/Failed 'logic' used for creating Fire, Lightning, Sun, Fertility, and Ten thousand other 'gods.'
1. God of the gaps - RationalWiki
God of the gaps(or a divine fallacy) is logical fallacy that occurs when Goddidit (or a variant) is invoked to explain some natural phenomena that science cannot (at the time of the argument). This concept is similar to what systems theorists refer to as an "explanatory principle." "God of the gaps" is a bad argument not only on logical grounds, but on empirical grounds: there is a long history of "gaps" being filled and the gap for God thus getting smaller and smaller, suggesting "we don't know Yet" as an alternative that works Better in practice; naturalistic explanations for still-mysterious phenomena are always possible, especially in the future where more information may be uncovered.[1]The God of the Gaps is a didit Fallacy and an ad hoc Fallacy, as well as an Argument from Incredulity or an Argument from Ignorance, and is thus an informal fallacy...
2. Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/God_of...pe_of_argument
The term God-of-the-gaps fallacy can refer to a position that assumes an act of God as the explanation for an unknown phenomenon, which is a variant of an argument from ignorance fallacy.[13][14] Such an argument is sometimes reduced to the following form:*There is a gap in understanding of some aspect of the natural world.*Therefore the cause must be supernatural.One example of such an argument, which uses God as an explanation of one of the current gaps in biological science, is as follows: "Because current science can't figure out exactly how life started, it must be God who caused life to start." Critics of intelligent design creationism, for example, have accused proponents of using this basic type of argument.[15]God-of-the-gaps arguments have been Discouraged by some theologians who assert that such arguments tend to relegate God to the Leftovers of science: as scientific knowledge Increases, the dominion of God Decreases...[4][5][16][17]
There is NO proof, or even evidence for god/s, just fallacious god-of-the-gaps inferences.
`
joke? Again........applied science is real science, anything based upon mental projections is nothing but "philosophy"
"Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools." -- Romans 1:22
Why can no one explain the origins of the universe as based upon the natural laws of physics? Why can no one reproduce life from non-living matter? Apply science to these questions and answer them based upon that application and come back tell us how smart you are.