Thunderbird
Gold Member
- Jun 16, 2010
- 5,394
- 1,757
- 200
No! Sanger strongly opposed supplying “GRATIS medical and nursing facilities to slum mothers.”Because Sanger was trying to give women the tools they needed, the tools poor and abused women in particular needed, so they and their children could live lives that were more human.Why not show basic humanity and condemn Sanger?
The Pivot of Civilization: The Cruelty of Charity
The Fertility of the Feeble-Minded Neglected Factors of the World Problem The Cruelty of Charity "Fostering the good-for-nothing at the expense of the good is an extreme cruelty. It is a deliberate storing up of miseries for future generations.
www.infoplease.com
Did you know Tom Paine vigorously condemned Washington?You are like the fools who say I must condemn all our Founding Fathers because some of them were slave owners and others made an alliance with slaveowners for the greater good. I stand in the tradition of Thomas Paine, but will even defend from cheap slurs and out-of-context calumny a great and heroic slaveowner and Indian fighter like George Washington, because I understand what he was ... and what he was not.
Why do you run from my question? Does it frighten you?I know you are used to asking stupid “gotcha” questions. I usually just ignore them.
Paine do you deny Sanger favored coercion and eugenics?
Some facts to consider:
Last edited: