Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You misuse the term "eunuchs", look it up.
Marriage equality deals with people, hon.
Yes, and marriage is equal already. Gay or straight all may marry if they choose to.
To much common sense for you?
Just like blacks and whites still had "equality" with anti miscegenation laws, right Pop? Your argument is exactly like those opposed to interracial marriage. Blacks could marry blacks and whites could marry whites. They had equality, right Pops?
Males and females coupling is necessary to move society forward.
Males coupling with males?
Sticky sheets and nothing more.
Sorry, you fail again
You misuse the term "eunuchs", look it up.
Marriage equality deals with people, hon.
Yes, and marriage is equal already. Gay or straight all may marry if they choose to.
To much common sense for you?
Just like blacks and whites still had "equality" with anti miscegenation laws, right Pop? Your argument is exactly like those opposed to interracial marriage. Blacks could marry blacks and whites could marry whites. They had equality, right Pops?
Males and females coupling is necessary to move society forward.
Males coupling with males?
Sticky sheets and nothing more.
Sorry, you fail again
Pops, what is the difference between gay couples with children and heterosexual couples with children? What's the difference between gay couples without children and straight couples without children?
Your inability to come up with something is glaring...
You misuse the term "eunuchs", look it up.
Marriage equality deals with people, hon.
Yes, and marriage is equal already. Gay or straight all may marry if they choose to.
To much common sense for you?
Just like blacks and whites still had "equality" with anti miscegenation laws, right Pop? Your argument is exactly like those opposed to interracial marriage. Blacks could marry blacks and whites could marry whites. They had equality, right Pops?
Males and females coupling is necessary to move society forward.
Males coupling with males?
Sticky sheets and nothing more.
Sorry, you fail again
Pops, what is the difference between gay couples with children and heterosexual couples with children? What's the difference between gay couples without children and straight couples without children?
Your inability to come up with something is glaring...
Where the children come from
A same sex coupling has never produced a child.
One coupling can
One coupling cannot
You have a tough time with this, I get that.
I am sorry, did you not read the OP? Its in there. Why are you so obsessed with the sexual nature of things? That is why you are so confused, you are focused on sex, period.So it is a form of Torettes Syndrome. Are you seeing a professional?
What parenting skill requires either a penis or a vagina? How, exactly, are gay couples with children different than straight couples with children? How, exactly, are gay couples without children different than straight couples without children?
And if you gave every idiot a brain, we wouldn't be arguing. So you support an orphaned 9 year old heterosexual boy being adopted by a 60 year old "daddy" homosexual and a 28 year old "twink son" homosexual?If we started a thread for every heterosexual that supported gay marriage this place would be flooded. Just sayin...
And if you gave every idiot a brain, we wouldn't be arguing. So you support an orphaned 9 year old heterosexual boy being adopted by a 60 year old "daddy" homosexual and a 28 year old "twink son" homosexual?If we started a thread for every heterosexual that supported gay marriage this place would be flooded. Just sayin...
When you speak of changing the meaning of a word like marriage, you also change the law to allow anybody to adopt children.
And if you gave every idiot a brain, we wouldn't be arguing. So you support an orphaned 9 year old heterosexual boy being adopted by a 60 year old "daddy" homosexual and a 28 year old "twink son" homosexual?If we started a thread for every heterosexual that supported gay marriage this place would be flooded. Just sayin...
When you speak of changing the meaning of a word like marriage, you also change the law to allow anybody to adopt children.
Let's keeps the insults to a minimum shall we.
I would support any person/couple willing to adopt a child that has meet all the criteria for adoption, whether they be gay, straight, or single. A loving and stable home is far better then being a warden of the state, bouncing from foster home to home.
Now come on guys lets lighten it up. We have to.
That was a minimum?And if you gave every idiot a brain, we wouldn't be arguing. So you support an orphaned 9 year old heterosexual boy being adopted by a 60 year old "daddy" homosexual and a 28 year old "twink son" homosexual?If we started a thread for every heterosexual that supported gay marriage this place would be flooded. Just sayin...
When you speak of changing the meaning of a word like marriage, you also change the law to allow anybody to adopt children.
Let's keeps the insults to a minimum shall we.
I would support any person/couple willing to adopt a child that has meet all the criteria for adoption, whether they be gay, straight, or single. A loving and stable home is far better then being a warden of the state, bouncing from foster home to home.
I am sorry, did you not read the OP? Its in there. Why are you so obsessed with the sexual nature of things? That is why you are so confused, you are focused on sex, period.So it is a form of Torettes Syndrome. Are you seeing a professional?
What parenting skill requires either a penis or a vagina? How, exactly, are gay couples with children different than straight couples with children? How, exactly, are gay couples without children different than straight couples without children?
I have to repeat the OP here, because you did not read it?
"What parenting skill requires either a penis or a vagina? " In the Society of the seawytch, the Eunuch raises the children.
That was a minimum?And if you gave every idiot a brain, we wouldn't be arguing. So you support an orphaned 9 year old heterosexual boy being adopted by a 60 year old "daddy" homosexual and a 28 year old "twink son" homosexual?If we started a thread for every heterosexual that supported gay marriage this place would be flooded. Just sayin...
When you speak of changing the meaning of a word like marriage, you also change the law to allow anybody to adopt children.
Let's keeps the insults to a minimum shall we.
I would support any person/couple willing to adopt a child that has meet all the criteria for adoption, whether they be gay, straight, or single. A loving and stable home is far better then being a warden of the state, bouncing from foster home to home.
What about all the criteria to be parents, not parent. Mother and Father.
If the state is bad, fix the state? Hell why would you not want to fix that problem first?
All these Democrat Presidents and politicians have made getting adopted so hard, and have never every fixed the broken system, so its now better to throw 9 year old heterosexual boys into any homosexual environment of your choosing.
Government literally gets to design families. Seems like the perfect dream, children in the society of the seawytch are raised by Eunuchs.
Children don't need a Mother and a Father, children need parents that care for them and give them loving, stable homes.