Gay Marriage supporters said this would never happen...

[bodecea]

Do you know that there are heterosexual pedophiles right now who are not in prison?

Do you know that they are raping children right now without being punished?

Do you know that heterosexual pedophiles are raping children while consenting grown adults of the same sex can't do something that isn't illegal?

Do you know that gay marriage is NOT illegal? Do you know that? Do you?

You want to stop consenting adults from doing something that is NOT illegal because you fear what some other people are doing?

Do you know that you can go fuck yourself?

Do you?

When they are caught, hetero pedophiles don't get a hero's welcome like gay ones do. There is a vast difference between the two CULTURES as to how children are regarded.

See the difference?

Do you?

Gay pedophiles get a hero's welcome? From whom? I haven't seen anyone rallying around the same sex pedophile problem in the Catholic church, have you?

Nope. But their arguments cannot stand without making stuff up about us, can it?

 

[bodecea]

What is the false proposition? Are you saying that the study by the National Health Institute is incorrect in its finding of a higher propensity of pedophilia among homosexuals. Are you saying I misquoted the first gay rights platform(or that it doesn't exist)?

Are you saying the story in the OP is false. What is the false proposition? There is a strong streak of pedophilia in the homosexual community, historically, the movement opposed age of consent laws until they became politically viable and wanted to be accepted socially. And now, pedophilia is on the road towards becoming a sexual preference much like what happened to homosexuality in the 70s.

You are the only ignorant one here. You don't know anything of history of the homosexual rights movement and don't understand what a logical fallacy is.

Until you understand these things, it is a waste of time to continue talking to you.

There's a strong streak of pedophilia in MEN. 1 in 4 girls are not sexually abused by gays now, are they?

 

[koshergrl]

What is the false proposition? Are you saying that the study by the National Health Institute is incorrect in its finding of a higher propensity of pedophilia among homosexuals. Are you saying I misquoted the first gay rights platform(or that it doesn't exist)?

Are you saying the story in the OP is false. What is the false proposition? There is a strong streak of pedophilia in the homosexual community, historically, the movement opposed age of consent laws until they became politically viable and wanted to be accepted socially. And now, pedophilia is on the road towards becoming a sexual preference much like what happened to homosexuality in the 70s.

You are the only ignorant one here. You don't know anything of history of the homosexual rights movement and don't understand what a logical fallacy is.

Until you understand these things, it is a waste of time to continue talking to you.

Yup. This is the universal understanding of the entire board.

 

[RandallFlagg]

Omg a couple of years ago Bode was posting all sorts of queer *pride* parade images, with nancies in *uniform*...The meme was "troops are marching in gay pride parades" as if it was condoned by the military, and officially endorsed by them.

Yep...it's wonderful!

But "nancies"? Those "nancies" defend our country. Do you?

How about Fag perverts. That work for you?

 

[RandallFlagg]

But "nancies"? Those "nancies" defend our country. Do you?

We thank them for their service, everyone.

And all who are anti-same sex here, please tell us who served.

And all of those of you who are anti-same sex and have not served, shame on you.

I served. In Combat. Wounded. So what? The military of today is NOT the military of our Fathers. Sure, there were fags. No one ever doubted it. However, if they came "out" they were beaten half to death then kicked out.

And that was better than they deserved. Now? Women, Fags and illegal aliens. Welcome to the 21st Century.

 

[bodecea]

Omg a couple of years ago Bode was posting all sorts of queer *pride* parade images, with nancies in *uniform*...The meme was "troops are marching in gay pride parades" as if it was condoned by the military, and officially endorsed by them.

Yep...it's wonderful!

But "nancies"? Those "nancies" defend our country. Do you?

How about Fag perverts. That work for you?

Fag perverts that bravely defend our country. We're tough...your name-calling is nothing.

 

[koshergrl]

Those pukes have never protected anything, except their portion of fried shrimp at the all you can eat Happy Panda buffet.

 

[Derideo_Te]

The point being, they're fags dressing up as military.

Not true military.

Sort of like bode isn't true military.

Anyone who served deserves respect for their service to this nation.

It is unAmerican to be disrespectful of those who wore the uniform of the United States.

 

[Derideo_Te]

What is the false proposition? Are you saying that the study by the National Health Institute is incorrect in its finding of a higher propensity of pedophilia among homosexuals. Are you saying I misquoted the first gay rights platform(or that it doesn't exist)?

Are you saying the story in the OP is false. What is the false proposition? There is a strong streak of pedophilia in the homosexual community, historically, the movement opposed age of consent laws until they became politically viable and wanted to be accepted socially. And now, pedophilia is on the road towards becoming a sexual preference much like what happened to homosexuality in the 70s.

You are the only ignorant one here. You don't know anything of history of the homosexual rights movement and don't understand what a logical fallacy is.

Until you understand these things, it is a waste of time to continue talking to you.

 

[Derideo_Te]

But "nancies"? Those "nancies" defend our country. Do you?

We thank them for their service, everyone.

And all who are anti-same sex here, please tell us who served.

And all of those of you who are anti-same sex and have not served, shame on you.

I served. In Combat. Wounded. So what? The military of today is NOT the military of our Fathers. Sure, there were fags. No one ever doubted it. However, if they came "out" they were beaten half to death then kicked out.

And that was better than they deserved. Now? Women, Fags and illegal aliens. Welcome to the 21st Century.

Got to wonder if your miserable excuse for a life was saved by someone who was gay!

That doesn't mean that I am disrespecting your service but the oath you took was to defend the Constitution and that includes EQUALITY for ALL under the law.

Too bad you are incapable of being man enough to live up to the oath that you took.

 

[koshergrl]

The point being, they're fags dressing up as military.

Not true military.

Sort of like bode isn't true military.

Anyone who served deserves respect for their service to this nation.

It is unAmerican to be disrespectful of those who wore the uniform of the United States.

I have no respect for fags who dishonor the uniform by defiling it to make political or sexual hay.

I suspect none of the queers wearing NAVY t-shirts in those images have EVER served in the military, and if they were, they are violating the dress code, in which case, again, I have no respect for them.

 

[RWHeathenGamer]

What is the false proposition? Are you saying that the study by the National Health Institute is incorrect in its finding of a higher propensity of pedophilia among homosexuals. Are you saying I misquoted the first gay rights platform(or that it doesn't exist)?

Are you saying the story in the OP is false. What is the false proposition? There is a strong streak of pedophilia in the homosexual community, historically, the movement opposed age of consent laws until they became politically viable and wanted to be accepted socially. And now, pedophilia is on the road towards becoming a sexual preference much like what happened to homosexuality in the 70s.

You are the only ignorant one here. You don't know anything of history of the homosexual rights movement and don't understand what a logical fallacy is.

Until you understand these things, it is a waste of time to continue talking to you.

LOL @ the lazy faggot who can't go back a couple pages.

But I will link it again, to humor you.

Using phallometric test sensitivities to calculate the proportion of true pedophiles among various groups of sex offenders against children, and taking into consideration previously reported mean numbers of victims per offender group, the ratio of heterosexual to homosexual pedophiles was calculated to be approximately 11:1. This suggests that the resulting proportion of true pedophiles among persons with a homosexual erotic development is greater than that in persons who develop heterosexually.

The proportions of heterosexual and homos... [J Sex Marital Ther. 1992] - PubMed - NCBI

 

[RWHeathenGamer]

What is the false proposition? Are you saying that the study by the National Health Institute is incorrect in its finding of a higher propensity of pedophilia among homosexuals. Are you saying I misquoted the first gay rights platform(or that it doesn't exist)?

Are you saying the story in the OP is false. What is the false proposition? There is a strong streak of pedophilia in the homosexual community, historically, the movement opposed age of consent laws until they became politically viable and wanted to be accepted socially. And now, pedophilia is on the road towards becoming a sexual preference much like what happened to homosexuality in the 70s.

You are the only ignorant one here. You don't know anything of history of the homosexual rights movement and don't understand what a logical fallacy is.

Until you understand these things, it is a waste of time to continue talking to you.

There's a strong streak of pedophilia in MEN. 1 in 4 girls are not sexually abused by gays now, are they?

Your point?

Yes it will be homosexual MEN(if you cant call them that) at the forefront of the age consent movement.

 

[hazlnut]

Go to hell intolerant homophobes.

You are the real sinners.

Not a Christian bone in you bigoted bodies.

 

[Antares]

Go to hell intolerant homophobes.

You are the real sinners.

Not a Christian bone in you bigoted bodies.

Really?

I don't care which hole you like it in kid.

 

[Derideo_Te]

What is the false proposition? Are you saying that the study by the National Health Institute is incorrect in its finding of a higher propensity of pedophilia among homosexuals. Are you saying I misquoted the first gay rights platform(or that it doesn't exist)?

Are you saying the story in the OP is false. What is the false proposition? There is a strong streak of pedophilia in the homosexual community, historically, the movement opposed age of consent laws until they became politically viable and wanted to be accepted socially. And now, pedophilia is on the road towards becoming a sexual preference much like what happened to homosexuality in the 70s.

You are the only ignorant one here. You don't know anything of history of the homosexual rights movement and don't understand what a logical fallacy is.

Until you understand these things, it is a waste of time to continue talking to you.

LOL @ the lazy faggot who can't go back a couple pages.

But I will link it again, to humor you.

Using phallometric test sensitivities to calculate the proportion of true pedophiles among various groups of sex offenders against children, and taking into consideration previously reported mean numbers of victims per offender group, the ratio of heterosexual to homosexual pedophiles was calculated to be approximately 11:1. This suggests that the resulting proportion of true pedophiles among persons with a homosexual erotic development is greater than that in persons who develop heterosexually.

The proportions of heterosexual and homos... [J Sex Marital Ther. 1992] - PubMed - NCBI

Obviously you are incapable of comprehending what you are reading. In essence the study is alleging that 9% of the pedophile population is gay as opposed to 4% of population nationally being gay. However the study by NBER indicates that the national figure for the LBGT population is grossly underestimated because of the negative image that still exists.

The Size of the LGBT Population and the Magnitude of Anti-Gay Sentiment are Substantially Underestimated

The Size of the LGBT Population and the Magnitude of Anti-Gay Sentiment are Substantially Underestimated
Katherine B. Coffman, Lucas C. Coffman, Keith M. Marzilli Ericson
NBER Working Paper No. 19508
Issued in October 2013
NBER Program(s): HC LS PE POL
Measuring sexual orientation, behavior, and related opinions is difficult because responses are biased towards socially acceptable answers. We test whether measurements are biased even when responses are private and anonymous and use our results to identify sexuality-related norms and how they vary. We run an experiment on 2,516 U.S. participants. Participants were randomly assigned to either a “best practices method” that was computer-based and provides privacy and anonymity, or to a “veiled elicitation method” that further conceals individual responses. Answers in the veiled method preclude inference about any particular individual, but can be used to accurately estimate statistics about the population. Comparing the two methods shows sexuality-related questions receive biased responses even under current best practices, and, for many questions, the bias is substantial. The veiled method increased self-reports of non-heterosexual identity by 65% (p<0.05) and same-sex sexual experiences by 59% (p<0.01). The veiled method also increased the rates of anti-gay sentiment. Respondents were 67% more likely to express disapproval of an openly gay manager at work (p<0.01) and 71% more likely to say it is okay to discriminate against lesbian, gay, or bisexual individuals (p<0.01). The results show non-heterosexuality and anti-gay sentiment are substantially underestimated in existing surveys, and the privacy afforded by current best practices is not always sufficient to eliminate bias. Finally, our results identify two social norms: it is perceived as socially undesirable both to be open about being gay, and to be unaccepting of gay individuals.

The reality is that if the LBGT population were accurately measured then the percentage of pedophiles would reflect the percentages of heteros and LBGT members of society.

But since these FACTS are not what you want to see you will refuse to accept them. And that is a prediction that I make fully expecting that someone with your homophobia will have the usual kneejerk reaction to something that refutes your bigoted beliefs.

 

[hazlnut]

Hey, dopey Boss, please show us a thread in which a gay marriage supporter said that some fringe group in GB would NEVER teach a controversial class in which a conservative GB rag would blow it way out of proportion as an anti-gay rant. That will never happen.


Specifically: Which gay marriage support said a crackpot in GB would never teach a wacko class. -- because that's all this story is about. A fucking class with some wacky ideas.


Fucking homophobic bait thread is all this shit is.

 

[Antares]

Hey, dopey Boss, please show us a thread in which a gay marriage supporter said that some fringe group in GB would NEVER teach a controversial class in which a conservative GB rag would blow it way out of proportion as an anti-gay rant. That will never happen.


Specifically: Which gay marriage support said a crackpot in GB would never teach a wacko class. -- because that's all this story is about. A fucking class with some wacky ideas.


Fucking homophobic bait thread is all this shit is.

...and ye here you are "swallowing" said bait balls and all.

 

[RandallFlagg]

We thank them for their service, everyone.

And all who are anti-same sex here, please tell us who served.

And all of those of you who are anti-same sex and have not served, shame on you.

I served. In Combat. Wounded. So what? The military of today is NOT the military of our Fathers. Sure, there were fags. No one ever doubted it. However, if they came "out" they were beaten half to death then kicked out.

And that was better than they deserved. Now? Women, Fags and illegal aliens. Welcome to the 21st Century.

Got to wonder if your miserable excuse for a life was saved by someone who was gay!

That doesn't mean that I am disrespecting your service but the oath you took was to defend the Constitution and that includes EQUALITY for ALL under the law.

Too bad you are incapable of being man enough to live up to the oath that you took.

Fuck you. You disrespect service every time you open your Nazi mouth. The only "defense" you have is for the perverts of the world. Again - fuck you.

 

[RWHeathenGamer]

Proof? What proof do you have, even if it is under reported as your study claims, that those not reporting and are homosexual don't have the same rate of pedophilia as those who report their sexual identity and are homosexual. Couldn't it even be higher, that would make more sense to me. Pedophilia certainly isn't as socially acceptable as homosexuality and someone remaining private about their sexual preferences or lie.

You are making an absurd claim with no verifiable data.

The data you present doesn't support your conclusion.